Our verdict

Often perceived as a doppelganger of the Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld, the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is a remarkable shoe on its own. Standing at the origins of the entire Jordan brand, this sneaker is a walking history that's associated with Michael Jordan's glorious Chicago Bulls era. Well-made and highly durable, we confidently rocked this sneaker on the city streets for hours. With its timeless profile, head-turning details, and rich background, a pair of AJ 1 Low has long become our wardrobe staple.

Air Jordan 3 Retro Gs Cool Grey Pros

  • Legendary silhouette
  • Adds +1000 points to style
  • The Air Jordan 13 Lakers Celebrates MJs First Ring
  • Following the other Air Jordan 16 Retro models we shared
  • A Zoom Air unit adds a touch of bounce
  • Very secure foothold
  • Excellent value for money
  • True to size

Air Jordan 3 Retro Gs Cool Grey Cons

  • Air Jordan 4 Retro Military Black UK 10.5
  • Air Jordan 1 Low WMNS Football Grey Aluminum
  • Where To Buy The Air Jordan 1 Royal

Audience verdict

91
Great!
  • Top 29% most popular sneakers

Who should buy

Apart from sneaker fans who enjoy the perennial appeal of the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs, we can highly recommend this iconic shoe to people who:

  • want a well-built leather sneaker that's going to last
  • love "Bred" color blocking (a nod to the Chicago Bulls official colors)

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs review

Who should NOT buy

One reason why you may not vibe with this Air Jordan is its lack of cushioning and comfort for all-day wear. You will find the Nike Air Max 90 and the Air Jordan x Nike Air Max Jordan Brand will have a Shoes lineup of.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs lab test

Cushioning

Heel stack

Did you know that before signing a contract with Nike back in the '80s, Michael Jordan actually preferred Adidas shoes? He found them more grounded compared to Nike.

Perhaps this explains why the Air Jordan 1 has such a low profile? The Couture shoe was designed to meet Jordan's needs at the time.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs low stack

Looking at our caliper measurement, the shoe's heel stack is as low as 22.9 mm which is significantly lower than average!

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Heel stack

Oh, gosh, it's nearly as low as the Adidas Samba (19.3 mm) and the Gazelle (23.3 mm)!

Test results
Air 1 Low 22.9 mm
Average 30.2 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
16.9 mm
Heel stack
50.5 mm

Forefoot stack

The midsole gets even thinner in the forefoot, showing a mere 11.8 mm on our caliper.

Indeed, the AJ1 Low feels extremely low to the ground. We find it hard to believe that the 6'6" tall Michael Jordan considered this to be enough cushioning for professional play.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Forefoot stack
Test results
Air 1 Low 11.8 mm
Average 19.1 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
9.7 mm
Forefoot stack
29.5 mm

Air Jordan 3 Retro Gs Cool Grey | Drop

Looking at the shoe's half-cut midsole, we see a rather gradual 11.1 mm drop.

The heel is moderately elevated above the toes offering a touch of support for the Achilles without pushing the toes forward.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Drop
Test results
Air 1 Low 11.1 mm
Average 11.1 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
3.5 mm
Drop
17.2 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

As you can probably tell by now, cushioning is very minimal in this Air Jordan sneaker. What's more, it is not very soft either.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Midsole softness

Pressing our Shore A durometer against the foam returned a reading of 27.8 HA. It indicates a moderately soft material that offers just a touch of shock absorption.

Coupled with a firm cup sole and an even firmer rubber outsole, it makes the AJ1 Low feel less than cushy on foot.

It seems like the Air capsule under the heel is the shoe's primary source of comfort and impact protection.

Test results
Air 1 Low 27.8 HA
Average 29.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 75 sneakers
Number of shoes
15.0 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
46.4 HA

Insole thickness

A lightly padded insole helps to soften the blow underfoot. We measured its thickness at 4.1 mm which is slightly thinner than average.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Insole thickness
Test results
Air 1 Low 4.1 mm
Average 5.1 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
3.1 mm
Insole thickness
11.5 mm

Size and fit

Size

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is true to size (755 votes).

jordan 11 retro closing ceremony?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 110 sneakers
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

If you have medium-width feet, the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is going to treat you to an expected D medium fit. Our tests showed that this sneaker offers sufficient wiggle room in the toebox.

Aside from personal experience, we created a gel replica of the shoe's interiors to measure its dimensions as accurately as possible.

In the widest part of the mold, our digital caliper recorded an above-average reading of 94.9 mm which is a good amount of space for a medium-width foot.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Toebox width - widest part
Test results
Air 1 Low 94.9 mm
Average 92.3 mm
Compared to 74 sneakers
Number of shoes
85.4 mm
Toebox width - widest part
96.8 mm

Toebox width - big toe

The shoe's mold shows some noticeabe tapering but luckily, it doesn't get too pointy. Measuring its width near the big toe returned just a standard reading of 68.5 mm.

Its taper angle is more pronounced because the shoe is wider in the metatarsal area to begin with.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Toebox width - big toe
Test results
Air 1 Low 68.5 mm
Average 68.8 mm
Compared to 74 sneakers
Number of shoes
63.9 mm
Toebox width - big toe
74.1 mm

Toebox height

We also found that the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs's toebox does not put pressure on the toes from the top. Our caiper measured its toebox height at an above-average 29.8 mm.

This is good news because toe pinching wouldn't be fun with the shoe's thick and nonforgiving leather upper.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Toebox height
Test results
Air 1 Low 29.8 mm
Average 27.7 mm
Compared to 74 sneakers
Number of shoes
20.7 mm
Toebox height
35.0 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Considering how firm, structured, and low-to-the-ground it is, you can expect a pretty solid footing from the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs.

The stitched cup sole design also makes the sneaker more supportive. Our feet felt cradled by it inside the shoe.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs cupsole

Torsional rigidity

Even if you have flat feet and overpronation (excessive rolling of the foot/ankle inwards), the AJ1 Low won't let you buckle so easily.

As you can see from our manual test above, the shoe has a lot of torsional rigidity to it. On a stiffness scale from 1 to 5, we gave it a high score of 4.

Test results
Air 1 Low 4
Average 3.6
Compared to 92 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

This Jordan sneaker also features an immensely stiff heel counter. It created a real death grip around our heels eliminating every chance of heel slippage or sliding inside the shoe.

This is the highest level of heel hold that you can get in a sneaker. Thus, we rated the shoe's heel counter stiffness with the highest score of 5.

P.S. Let us remind you once again that wearing taller socks and snapping on a band-aid may be necessary to prevent the shoe's rough heel collar from digging into your Achilles.

Test results
Air 1 Low 5
Average 3.2
Compared to 92 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

sneaker offerings from Jordan

Examining the platform of the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs, we found a pretty basic shape that's neither too narrow nor chunky.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Midsole width in the forefoot

Our caliper shows that it has standard dimensions for a lifestyle sneaker. In the widest part of the forefoot, we measured 110.2 mm. Just about the same as the average.

Test results
Air 1 Low 110.2 mm
Average 108.5 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
95.1 mm
sneaker offerings from Jordan
121.0 mm

Midsole width - heel

The same goes for the shoe's heel. Measuring the widest area here, our caliper returned 82.5 mm.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Midsole width in the heel

Carhartt Jordan 23.

Test results
Air 1 Low 82.5 mm
Average 83.6 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
67.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
103.1 mm

Jordan 11 IE Low Light Orewood

Considering how stiff the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs felt straight from the box, we were surprised that it was only moderately stiffer than average.

According to our shoe flexing tester, this Jordan silhouette requires a force of 16.2N to bend by 30 degrees. This is about 15% more than it took our lab-tested sneakers on average but we honestly thoughht it would be even more.

Air Jordan 3 Retro Gs Cool Grey.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Jordan 11 IE Low Light Orewood
Test results
Air 1 Low 16.2N
Average 14.0N
Compared to 33 sneakers
Number of shoes
4.6N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
27.6N

Weight

The Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is not a lightweight sneaker but it doesn't feel particularly heavy either.

In a men's US size 9, it showed 14.5 oz (411g) on our scale. Only half an ounce heavier than average.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Weight

To provide some context, the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is slightly lighter than the Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld (14.8 oz/420g) and notably lighter than the Here is a first look at the A Ma Maniére x Air Jordan 4 Violet Ore via j_owens96 (16.4 oz/465g).

Test results
Air 1 Low 14.50 oz (411g)
Average 13.79 oz (391g)
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
8.50 oz (241g)
Weight
20.49 oz (581g)

Breathability

With its entire upper made of leather, it's pretty clear why the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is not our top pick for summer.

Multiple perforations on the shoe's toebox don't seem to help the airflow that much. Pumping smoke into the shoe, we found that it primarily escaped through the gaps in the tongue area and not so much through the apertures over the toes.

In addition, the shoe's inner lining is so dense that it doesn't even let the light shine through the holes in our transparency test.

Rating the shoe's breathability on a 1-5 scale, we can't give it any higher than 2.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs ventilation holes

It would be wise to save the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs for colder weather and grab an airy mesh sneaker like the Nike Zoom Vomero 5 for summertime.

Test results
Air 1 Low 2
Average 3
Compared to 92 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Leather/Suede quality

Over the years, the Air Jordan 1 received a fair share of hate regarding its leather quality.

Having checked and tested the sneaker ourselves, we can confirm that TECHNICALLY it does use real leather. But it is not the same high-quality leather that we saw on New Balance's Made in USA shoes for example.

And that's fair enough considering that the Jordan 1 Low's moderate MSRP of $125.

We set out to test each panel on the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs's upper using a butane torch and a leather scratch awl.

The heel overlay, the toebox, and the eyestay layer all behaved well under the fire. The material did not melt or catch fire.

The shiny effect indicates that the leather is covered in a plastic finish that helps to prevent scratches and gives the shoe a classier look.

But we have some reservations about the shoe's midfoot panel and the Swoosh. These parts melted away much more easily than the rest. Looks like Nike is cutting corners in the low-wear areas like these.

Another nuisance to watch out for is creasing. The shoe's soft leather is prone to developing wrinkles pretty fast.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Leather/Suede quality creasing

Overall, we think that the leather quality of the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is reasonable for the price. If you set the expectations right from the beginning, you won't be disappointed with the sneaker.

Test results
Air 1 Low Real leather

Toebox durability

We rely on a Dremel to estimate the potential shelf life of every sneaker's upper. The tool is topped with a sandpaper tip which helps us to mimic the wear-and-tear of prolonged shoe wear.

Applying the tool to the shoe's toebox panel for 12 seconds at consistent pressure (3.2N) and speed (5K RPM), we were pleasantly surprised with the result.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Toebox durability test

The tool brushed off the topmost layer of the leather without affecting its overall integrity.

It is an excellent level of wear resistance that's reflected in the shoe's high toebox durability score of 4 out of 5.

Test results
Air 1 Low 4
Average 3.7
Compared to 92 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

OG Womens Air Jordan 13 1998 via.

The seemingly delicate textile took all the abuse from our Dremel without showing significant signs of wear.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Heel padding durability

seen with the Jordan Spizike.

P.S. Please note that the shoe's heel lining is quite rough to the touch. Even though it's great for wear resistance, it can be pretty hard on the skin. We advise wearing taller socks and stocking up on band-aids for the first few weeks of wearing the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs.

Test results
Air 1 Low 4
Average 3.2
Compared to 92 sneakers
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

Brand New Boys Air Jordan 1 High Gs Black Crimson Tint.

Its sturdiness is reflected in a particularly high reading of 89.5 HC on our Shore C durometer. It is one of the hardest sneaker outsoles in our lab and hardness often correlates with durability.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Outsole hardness
Test results
Air 1 Low 89.5 HC
Average 85.7 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 92 sneakers
Number of shoes
76.1 HC
Outsole hardness
94.0 HC

Outsole durability

Just as we expected, the shoe's rubber stood up to our Dremel test with flying colors!

Even though the tool's speed was set to the unforgiving 10K RPM and the exposure lasted for 22 seconds, the damage ended up even shallower than a millimeter! Our tread gauge showed as little as 0.8 mm!

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Outsole durability

Test results
Air 1 Low 0.8 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 92 sneakers
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

According to our caliper, the outsole of this Jordan sneaker is also quite thick (4.8 mm) which contributes to its longevity.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Outsole thickness

There is no need to hold your breath when wearing the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs. It is a tough kick that can handle concrete, asphalt, and even some casual hooping outdoors!

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs durability

Test results
Air 1 Low 4.8 mm
Average 5.3 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
2.9 mm
Outsole thickness
8.6 mm

Misc

Grip / Traction

In your day-to-day life, you probably don't need a super Shoes grip on a lifestyle sneaker. But if you do get into a slippery situation, the AJ 1 Low has got your back!

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs outsole

AIR JORDAN 6 RETRO HARE 2020.

Reflective elements

The Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs comes without reflective elements.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Reflective elements
Test results
Air 1 Low No

Air Jordan 3 Retro Gs Cool Grey | Tongue padding

The shoe treated the tops of our feet to a very well-padded tongue. Showing 15.9 mm on our caliper, it muted the lace pressure entirely.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Tongue padding
Test results
Air 1 Low 15.9 mm
Average 9.3 mm
Compared to 93 sneakers
Number of shoes
0.7 mm
Tongue padding
23.0 mm

is the newest member of Jordan Brand as the Michael Jordan s legacy continues beyond the hardwood

The tongue of the AJ1 Low doesn't have any attachments to the upper on the sides but it's not an issue. We didn't experience much tongue-shifting in this sneaker.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs is the newest member of Jordan Brand as the Michael Jordan s legacy continues beyond the hardwood
Test results
Air 1 Low None

Heel tab

There are no pull tabs on finger loops on this sneaker. The AJ 1 Low is too cool for that!

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Heel tab
Test results
Air 1 Low None

Removable insole

If you wish to enhance the in-shoe experience, you have the option to replace the stock insole with your custom orthotic.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs Removable insole
Test results
Air 1 Low Yes

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs vs. Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld

Unless you are an experienced sneakerhead, it is very easy to mix the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs with the Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld. The resemblance is striking!

Both designed by Peter Moore, Air jordan 1 high og pollen gradeschool.

air jordan 1 low vs nike dunk low 21512368 main

Nevertheless, there are a few notable features that set the two sneakers apart:

  • Air Jordan 1 Court Purple Keychainhe Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld does not have that technology. The Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs, on the other hand, carries that iconic Air-Sole tech that provides better cushioning than the traditional sole.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs vs Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld comparison

  • On the Dunk, the Swoosh intersects the heel counter and heel tab. Meanwhile, the AJ Lows display various stitching panels on the heel with the Swoosh tail above the heel counter.
  • The Air Jordan Low 1 flaunts the iconic Wing logo on its heel counter, while the Dunk Low also has the common Nike branding embroidered on its heel tab.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs vs Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld heel

  • The toebox shape of the Dunk Low is broader and taller, while the AJ 1 Low has a narrower, tapered profile. That's why we can't recommend the AJs to wide feet.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs vs Koop de Jordan Zion 1 ZNA bij top sneaker retailers over de hele wereld toebox shape

The origins of the Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs

The very first Air Jordan 1 sneaker saw light in 1985.

It was designed by Peter Moore, Tinker Hatfield, and Bruce Kilgore as a performance basketball shoe that catered to Michael Jordan when he played for the Chicago Bulls.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs style

The name "Air Jordan" was suggested by Michael's agent David Falk. It reflected the athlete's graceful soar during his legendary dunk shots.

The idea of flying through the air also lies behind the shoe's famous Wings Logo.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs wings logo

But the story of the Air Jordan 1 began with a scandal ignited by the now famous "Banned" colorway of the shoe.

According to NBA rules at the time, the shoe colors of all team players were supposed to match. However, Michael's pair of AJ 1s only had 23% of white as opposed to the 51% worn by the rest of his teammates. Nike had to pay a fine of $5,000 each time Michael played in his "BRED" pair.

Air Jordan 1 DMP Celtics vs history

It is a popular opinion, however, that Nike violated the rules on purpose to boost the crowd's interest in the newly released Jordan shoe.

Offered as a casual sneaker for the general public, the Air Jordan 1 earned the company over $150 million in sales from over 50,000 sold pairs.