Our verdict

Altra's updated Mar 3, 2025 is a hiking boot that rides more like a trail shoe on steroids. Its cushy midsole makes each mile marker on our test hikes feel as comfy as the last while being responsive enough to support a light jog. We also appreciate the boot's roomy and generously padded upper which gently pampers our feet as we trudge along. While it may not be the strongest on technical terrains, its barely-there build and good looks make the updated Mar 3, 2025 an excellent city-to-trail boot.

Pros

  • Exceptionally comfortable
  • Astonishingly lightweight
  • Difference in midsole softness in cold
  • Performs consistently in cold conditions
  • Superb durability
  • Supportive around the ankle
  • Heel counter stiffness
  • Merrel Moab 3
  • Dries quickly

Cons

  • Subpar grip on technical terrain
  • Underwhelming stability
  • Quite hard to put on and off

Audience verdict

74
Bad!

Who should buy

We recommend the Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 as an excellent hiking companion for:

  • Number of shoes
  • Speedy hikers looking for a nimble and lightweight boot that feels more like a trail runner underfoot
  • Year-round adventurers who need a boot that performs consistently from blustering summer treks to frigid winter hauls. 
  • Casual hikers looking for a boot that's good for long hauls as well as quick strolls through the park or around town
  • Those with broad feet prone to hotspots and blisters in need of a snug but accommodating toebox 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 gkghk

Who should NOT buy

While the updated Mar 3, 2025 provides excellent traction on dirt trails, we felt decidedly less surefooted on gravelly or rocky trails. For advanced hikers who frequently traverse more technical trails, we recommend the more aggressive for long-haul backpacking adventures that involve carrying heavy loads.  instead. 

The updated Mar 3, 2025 is weatherproof, but not waterproof. So while the boot will keep our feet relatively dry during rainfall, it won't help much when wading through riverbeds or streams. For those who need to keep their feet dry, especially in the colder months, we recommend the We recommend the Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 as an excellent hiking companion for instead. 

The flexibility of the updated Mar 3, 2025 certainly contributes to its comfy, trail-shoe vibe, but also detracts from its stability. Especially as the mile markers wear on and foot fatigue sets in. Backpackers looking to schlep heavy loads across vast distances will be better served by a more stable boot like the much heavier but supportive Difference in midsole softness in cold.

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 cu

The instability of the updated Mar 3, 2025 will feel even more pronounced for those with narrow feet who will have to put in more effort to stabilize their landings as their feet swim around in the toebox. For a more snug alternative, we recommend looking into the also lightweight Altra Olympus 6 Hike Mid GTX instead. 

Cushioning

Heel stack

We measured the updated Mar 3, 2025's stack to be 26.4 mm thick at the heel.

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Heel stack

This is significantly shorter than average but still has plenty of foam underfoot for us to enjoy well-cushioned landings over the course of testing this boot. 

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 26.4 mm
Average 36.3 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
26.2 mm
Heel stack
46.9 mm

Forefoot stack

Naturally, we expect the forefoot stack to match the heel but there's a bit of a discrepancy with the updated Mar 3, 2025. Using the measuring guidelines set by World Athletics, we measured the updated Mar 3, 2025's forefoot stack to actually be 23.8 mm thick. So, technically, it's not a true zero-drop boot. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Forefoot stack

This amount of foam underfoot is on par with our current lab average and is enough to effectively mute out the harsh terrain below. 

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 23.8 mm
Average 22.9 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
17.0 mm
Forefoot stack
31.0 mm

Drop

The difference in our stack measurements means that the updated Mar 3, 2025 actually sports a 2.6 mm heel drop. This is still a more parallel-to-the-ground experience than most hiking boots offer and will only be noticeable to true zero-drop purists. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Drop
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 2.6 mm
Average 13.4 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0.6 mm
Drop
21.0 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Pressing our durometer against the midsole yields a reading of 22 HA. This level of softness provides a balanced level of cushioning 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 hjev

Apart from providing good impact dampening, the midsole is also quite responsive. It has a springy rebound that feels more like a trail running shoe that gives us a little extra pep in our step while hiking in this boot. What's more, it means that we could break out into a jog at a moment's notice and comfortably scamper along the trails like a breeze. 

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 22.0 HA
Average 28.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
14.7 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
53.3 HA

Midsole softness in cold

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.
Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Midsole softness in cold

Midsole softness in cold (%)

We placed the updated Mar 3, 2025 in our freezer for twenty minutes to see the effects of cold conditions on the midsole. Once appropriately chilled, we pressed our durometer against it once more and got a much softer-than-average reading of 25.3 HA. This 14.8% increase in firmness means that the updated Mar 3, 2025 performs very consistently no matter how frosty it gets and will provide balanced cushioning all year round. 

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 15%
Average 20%
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
4%
Midsole softness in cold
50%

Insole thickness

We measured the insole to be 7.4 mm thick which is quite a bit thicker than our current lab average. This provided us with great arch support and a cushy footbed to sink into that really elevated our levels of comfort while testing this boot. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Insole thickness
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 7.4 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.7 mm
Insole thickness
8.0 mm

Size and fit

Size

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 is half size small (37 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 39 hiking boots
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Hoka Anacapa Mid GTX

According to the product specs, the updated Mar 3, 2025 features Altra's Original Footshape which is supposed to be the brand's widest, most spacious fit.

However, when we retrieved a mold of the shoe's interiors using custom gel, it showed a pretty standard measurement in the widest part of the toebox. At 94.9 mm, it is only about a milimeter wider than average.

for long-haul backpacking adventures that involve carrying heavy loads.  Both sides semi new method shoe returned a notably higher reading of 97.8 mm. You might as well consider the Hoka Anacapa Mid GTX which is also built on the Original last but showed 98.8 mm in the widest part.

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Hoka Anacapa Mid GTX
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 94.9 mm
Average 93.9 mm
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Number of shoes
89.7 mm
Hoka Anacapa Mid GTX
98.8 mm

Both sides semi

On the bright side, the updated Mar 3, 2025 does provide that natural foot-shaped silhouette we've come to love from Altra. Its square toebox shape has ZERO tapering towards the toes!

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 erer

With a caliper reading of 80.9 mm near the big toe, the boot gave our toes plenty of room to splay out comfortably all throughout the hike.

Conversely, having so much internal real estate isn't ideal for people with narrow feet as the latter will most likely shift around within the boot when traversing uneven terrains, which takes a toll on stability and can exacerbate foot fatigue.

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Both sides semi
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 80.9 mm
Average 71.2 mm
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Number of shoes
64.5 mm
Both sides semi
80.9 mm

Toebox height

However, the vertical space of this hiking boot turned out to be on par with the average at 27.5 mm. It didn't cause any pressure on top of our toes.

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Toebox height
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 27.5 mm
Average 27.4 mm
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Number of shoes
22.7 mm
Toebox height
33.5 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

The updated Mar 3, 2025, for all its comfort, isn't a very stable shoe as demonstrated by how much lateral movement it allows as we shift our weight from side to side. This made traversing uneven terrains a little more challenging as we had to be more mindful of our steps and make lots of foot adjustments for balance. While this is fine when it comes to day hikes, we would recommend a more stable shoe like the Keen Pyrenees for long-haul backpacking adventures that involve carrying heavy loads. 

Torsional rigidity

With its minimalist nature, the updated Mar 3, 2025 did not resist our manual rigidity assessment so much, leading to a below-average stiffness score of 3 out of 5.

This Altra boot relies on a wide and grounded platform to provide surefooted landings as opposed to the stout midsoles and stabilizing components we see on most hiking boots.

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 3
Average 4.4
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The updated Mar 3, 2025's heel counter is somewhat flexible and earns a middle-of-the-road stiffness score of 3 out of 5. So while it does provide a secure lockdown that comfortably holds our heel in place, it doesn't do much to mitigate the rearfoot from rolling laterally. 

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 3
Average 3.6
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit

The updated Mar 3, 2025's midsole is about as wide as our current lab average at 110 mm according to our caliper measurements. This gives us a good amount of platform for relatively stable landings. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 110.0 mm
Average 111.5 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
96.3 mm
Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit
124.6 mm

oz / 339g

Back at the heel, we found the updated Mar 3, 2025's midsole to be narrower than average at only 84.4 mm wide. This didn't really present us with any issues while testing, but those more accustomed to a wider base at the heel should look into the Timberland Sprint Trekker instead. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Midsole width in the heel
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 84.4 mm
Average 87.5 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
71.7 mm
oz / 339g
106.1 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

We secured the updated Mar 3, 2025 in our flexibility testing machine and found that it takes as little as 12.0N of force to bend by 30 degrees. That makes it more than half as flexible as the average hiking boot!

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Flexibility / Stiffness

The flexibility of the updated Mar 3, 2025 is thanks in part to the configuration of its lugs which are designed to line up with the bones of our foot, allowing the shoe to bend along with the natural flexion of our foot with relative ease.

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 hjvhjkvkuv

This certainly plays a role in how comfy and forgiving the updated Mar 3, 2025 feels underfoot, however it does come at the expense of stability, especially when carrying a heavy pack.

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 12.0N
Average 31.8N
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Number of shoes
12.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
65.7N

Weight

The updated Mar 3, 2025 is a lean, mean, trail-crushing machine that tips our scale at only 12 oz (339g). 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Weight

As such, the updated Mar 3, 2025 feels incredibly feathery underfoot which not only makes it great for long hikes with lots of ascents and descents, but also unburdensome enough to support light jogs for whenever the need for speed kicks in. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Weight
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 11.96 oz (339g)
Average 18.77 oz (532g)
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
11.71 oz (332g)
Weight
28.29 oz (802g)

Breathability

To see how breathable the updated Mar 3, 2025 is, we pumped it full of smoke and observed how easily it was able to vent from the boot. As we can see from the footage, the smoke was only able to escape through the updated Mar 3, 2025's porous, semi-gusseted tongue while the rest of the upper remains relatively airtight. This leads us to give the updated Mar 3, 2025 a breathability score of 2 out of 5. This means that the boot will certainly feel stuffy during hikes on sweltering summer days but still has some level of airflow to keep it from becoming a stinky foot sauna. 

The Merrel Moab 3, on the other hand, lets the smoke dissipate rather evenly throughout the shoe, making it much more suited for hikes on hot, dry days. 

Inspecting a cross-section of the mostly mesh upper, we see that it entirely blocks out the backlight, thus confirming the insular, weatherproof nature of the shoe. Just as light isn't able to peak through any pores of the upper, water is similarly repelled unless the boot gets drenched. 

To see how the mech is able to repel water so efficiently, we took a look at it under the microscope which reveals an incredibly uniform and dense weave pattern with almost no gaps between the braids.  

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Breathability

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 kekj
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 2
Average 1.3
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

To simulate extreme wear and tear, we subjected the updated Mar 3, 2025 to a series of Dremel tests, starting with the toebox. Spinning at 5K RPM, we set the tool's abrasive element to an unreinforced section of mesh with 3.2N of force.

While we were able to pierce through the mesh by the end of the twelve-second test, the hole left doesn't span the entire point of contact and the overall integrity of the toebox wasn't greatly affected, so we give the updated Mar 3, 2025 a middle-of-the-road toebox durability score of 3 out of 5. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Toebox durability
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 3
Average 4.3
Compared to 37 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

which is also built on the Original last but showed 98.8 mm in the widest part

The heel counter proved to be an even better adversary to our Dremel which merely skated off the lining material and left the padding beneath intact. 

This stellar performance leads us to give the updated Mar 3, 2025 a perfect 5 out of 5 for heel padding durability. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 which is also built on the Original last but showed 98.8 mm in the widest part
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 5
Average 3.6
Compared to 37 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
which is also built on the Original last but showed 98.8 mm in the widest part
5

Outsole hardness

The MaxTrac rubber compound that makes up the outsole gave us a durometer reading of 85.5 HC which is right around our current lab average. This usually denotes a good mix of grip and durability, the latter of which will be tested in the next section. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Outsole hardness
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 85.5 HC
Average 87.1 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
81.0 HC
Outsole hardness
92.1 HC

Outsole durability

This time spinning at 10K RPM, we set the Dremel against one of the lugs which immediately kicked up a flurry of rubber particles. Not a promising sign. 

After twenty-two seconds of grinding, we measured the indentation left behind with a tire tread gauge and found that 1.2 mm of material was lost to the test. This makes the updated Mar 3, 2025's outsole less durable than the average hiking boot which loses less under similar circumstances. This further confirms that this boot isn't well-suited for harsh, gravelly trails which will erode the lugs at a much faster rate than softer dirt trails. The Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2 sports a much more durable outsole with a similarly light trail shoe-esque frame. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Outsole durability
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 1.2 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 34 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

The updated Mar 3, 2025's outsole boasts less rubber than average at only 2.1 mm thick according to our caliper measurements. While this doesn't do the boot any favors in terms of durability, it does contribute to its lightweight frame. 

Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 2.1 mm
Average 3.0 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1.8 mm
Outsole thickness
5.6 mm

Misc

Lug depth

The updated Mar 3, 2025's lugs are 4 mm thick according to our caliper measurements, putting them on par with our current lab average. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Lug depth

These multi-directional, chevron-shaped lugs provided us with excellent traction during our test hikes on dirt trails and well-manicured park trails. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Lug depth

However, the boot did let us down when we tested it on more technical, gravelly trails where we felt decidedly less surefooted in our strides. We also recommend avoiding slick or muddy surfaces in this boot. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Lug depth
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 4.0 mm
Average 4.3 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.0 mm
Lug depth
6.0 mm

Reflective elements

The updated Mar 3, 2025 doesn't feature any reflective elements, so we don't recommend walking along dimly lit roads at night without additional high-vis gear. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Reflective elements
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 No

Tongue padding

At 9 mm thick according to our caliper measurements, the updated Mar 3, 2025's tongue is slightly less padded than our current lab average. It's still cushy enough to feel incredibly comfortable across the instep and effectively protects us from lace bite while testing this boot. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Tongue padding
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 9.0 mm
Average 11.2 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
5.9 mm
Tongue padding
15.1 mm

oz / 522g

Unlike many other hiking boots we've tested so far, the updated Mar 3, 2025's tongue is only semi-gusseted. While this might help in shaving off a few grams from the overall weight, it does mean that little bits of grit and debris did occasionally make their way into the boot during our test hikes. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 oz / 522g
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

There's a cord-like finger loop at the heel of the updated Mar 3, 2025 to help pull the boot on.

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Heel tab

However, despite this feature, we still found the boot difficult to squeeze into without loosening up the laces significantly. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Heel tab
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 Finger loop

Removable insole

The updated Mar 3, 2025's insole isn't glued in so it can easily be replaced with a custom orthotic if necessary. 

Altra updated Mar 3, 2025 Removable insole
Test results
updated Mar 3, 2025 Yes