Our verdict
- Top pick in best Reebok running shoes
Pros
- Comfortable all day
- A fun, peppy ride
- Supportive underfoot
- Affordable
- Welcomes wide feet
- Grippy on roads & light trails
- reebok shaqnosis yellow black minions fx3343 size
Cons
- Laces are short
- Poor outsole durability
- Not for hot days
Reebok sole fury x adidas boost black white men running shoes 100%legit fw0166 | Audience verdict
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + Add a shoe | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | 80 Good! | 79 Good! | 85 Good! | 87 Great! | |
Price | $65 | $70 | $65 | $75 | |
Pace | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | |
Arch support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
Weight lab Weight brand | 8.7 Reebok Ers 2000 White Blue Reserve Retro Trainers Mens Sneake 10.2 Reebok sole fury x adidas boost black white men running shoes 100%legit fw0166 | 9.9 Reebok Club C 85 Cloud White Alabaster Pure Grey 3 10 Reebok Az II GX5323 | 9.7 Reebok Insta Pump Fury GoldNavyWhite 10.7 Reebok Royal Classic Jogger 2 TD | 11.2 oz / 318g 10.1 oz / 285g | |
Lightweight | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | |
Drop lab Drop brand | 13.4 mm | 10.5 mm 10.0 mm | 9.4 mm 10.0 mm | 12.9 mm 8.0 mm | |
Strike pattern | Heel | Heel | HeelMid/forefoot | Heel | |
Size | True to size | True to size | True to size | True to size | |
Midsole softness | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | |
Difference in midsole softness in cold | Big | Small | Small | Normal | |
Toebox durability | - | Bad | Bad | Bad | |
Yellowbrick x Reebok Classic Leather Legacy Duality | - | Good | Bad | Bad | |
Outsole durability | - | Decent | Decent | Decent | |
Breathability | Warm | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Reebok Question Mid Georgetown from | Medium | Medium | Wide | Medium | |
Toebox width at the big toe | - | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Stiffness | Moderate | Flexible | Flexible | Flexible | |
Allen Iversons iconic Reebok Answer V is back | Big | Normal | Small | Big | |
Torsional rigidity | Flexible | Moderate | Flexible | Moderate | |
Heel counter stiffness | Flexible | Moderate | Moderate | Flexible | |
Heel lab Heel brand | 32.7 mm | 31.5 mm 31.0 mm | 31.2 mm 33.0 mm | 31.9 mm 34.0 mm | |
Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 19.3 mm | 21.0 mm 21.0 mm | 21.8 mm 23.0 mm | 19.0 mm 26.0 mm | |
Widths available | Normal | NormalWideX-Wide | NormalWide | NormalWide | |
Orthotic friendly | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Season | All seasons | All seasons | All seasons | All seasons | |
Removable insole | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Ranking | #271 Bottom 14% | #275 Bottom 12% | #193 Bottom 38% | #136 Top 44% | |
Popularity | #305 Bottom 3% | #29 Top 10% | #133 Top 43% | #264 Bottom 16% |
Size and fit
Size
x Reebok Beatnik Fossil is true to size (11 votes).
Who should buy the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil
The third iteration of the Reebok Lite is a much-needed addition to your running shoe rotation if you want a:
- Reebok Club C Grow Womens
- Reebok Classics Råhvide og lilla sneakers i nylon
- Reebok x Kendrick Lamar Ventilator
Who should NOT buy it
If you don't want to run short on laces, we suggest the New Counteract Fresh Foam Roav V2 as a better purchase than the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil.
brand new with original box Reebok Royal Prime FY1580 Zig Dynamica 4 scored 3/5 on our breathability test, while the Lite 3 scored 2/5. Small improvement but worth mentioning!
Upscale comfort on a budget
Because of the shoe's low-end price, we kept our expectations really low. But we must say that the shoe was a great surprise! We were able to wear it comfortably all day long and the comfort persisted!
This Reebok shoe really feels like a pair of slippers with its plush, pillow-like interiors and cushioning.
Based on our durometer measurements, this Reebok shoe proves to be rather soft. At 22.5 HA, it is 6% softer than the average.

But if you plan on running in the shoe in cold weather, keep in mind that the foam tends to get date in low temperatures. We tested this by keeping the shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes and then measuring the softness again. The cushioning got 42.2% date.
Not so breezy in the Lite 3
While this Reebok shoe keeps the interiors somewhat aerated, it is definitely not the shoe to reach for on a hot summer day.
With the help of a smoke-pumping machine, we assessed the amount of smoke passing through the shoe's upper. On a 1-5 scale where 5 is the most breathable, we rated this Reebok shoe as only 2. In the video below it is compared to the least breathable shoe in our roster (1 out of 5).
x Reebok Beatnik Fossil (left), Adidas Runfalcon (right)
And in the transparency test below, you can see where the shoe's ventilation pores are concentrated.
A home for the feet
In addition to its soft cushioning, the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil also does an exceptional job absorbing the shock during impact. This creates a very pleasing environment for the foot.
For a budget shoe, the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil has a pretty generous amount of heel cushioning. We measured the shoe's heel stack at 32.7 mm, which is right at the average of our lab-tested road running shoes. The forefoot stack, on the other hand, is 19.3 mm, only 5 mm thinner than the average.

The heel-to-toe drop measurement is not provided by the brand. But we measured it to be 13.4 mm. It is on the taller side but falls within the norm for Reebok Nano XI Pride 2021.
A higher drop is also more optimal for walking as it means that your heels receive more protection on each landing.
The x Reebok Beatnik Fossil has a good deal of support
And hey, it's a neutral running shoe. We didn't even expect any arch support from such a low-priced shoe!
Thanks to the shoe's supportive nature, we were able to run and walk in this Reebok shoe for hours without experiencing fatigue or pain.
One of the major contributing factors to stability is the shoe's wide base, especially in the forefoot. We measured it at 117.7 mm which is 5 mm wider than the average.
Usually, there is a correlation between the shoe's torsional rigidity and stability (the stiffer it is, the more stable the shoe feels). But the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil manages to stay flexible without compromising support. We gave it 2 out of 5 in our subjective flexibility assessment.
An everyday trainer isn't always dull
The x Reebok Beatnik Fossil even has a little bit of bounce to it which makes it an enjoyable ride.
The shoe also has a good flex in the forefoot which helps the ride feel more fluid. As our force gauge test shows, the Lite 3 is 25% more flexible than running shoes on average.
Almost weightless
This road running shoe is very light which definitely affects the overall comfort. Putting the Lite 3 on a scale in a men's US size 9, we got 8.8 oz (250g). This is 0.7 oz (20g) lighter than average!
A win for wide feet
The toebox of this Reebok shoe turned out to be pleasantly roomy. Measuring it with a caliper, we got 99.3 mm in the widest part of the forefoot. This is about the same as the average of road running shoes.
What helps to create more toe space in the Lite 3 is the not-so-pointy toebox.
Putting it on is quick and easy
You can just slide your foot in the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil and you're good to go. And taking it off is a cinch. It doesn't have a lot of fuss. On top of this, the laces stay tied.
But if you want to lace-lock the shoe, it might be difficult or impossible even because the laces are rather short.
club that goes beyond road running
Trying the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil on both roads and light trails, we experienced no slips on either! The shoe's club is solid and inspires a lot of confidence.
Durability is a miss
The outsole may be clubpy, but it fails when it comes to strength. That's where the budget-friendly price tag really starts to show.
Measuring the firmness of the outsole rubber at the bottom, we can see that it's 6% softer than the average. Usually, shoes with softer outsoles tend to last less and we can see why the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil is prone to abrasion.
Skimping on price but not on looks
With its not-too-chunky design, variety of colors, and overall neat aesthetic; we believe that the x Reebok Beatnik Fossil is an eye candy.