Our verdict

The Columbia Newton Ridge Plus II WP is a budget-friendly boot which is most suitable for casual wear and occasional hikes on moderate terrain. Very light and cosy on foot, you won't find any hardcore durability or support here. But it's a nice town-to-trail oprion with appealing outdoor vibes.

Pros

  • Hoka Trail Code GTX
  • Lightweight construction
  • Affordable price point
  • Toebox width - big toe new method
  • Stable and grounded base
  • Flexible forefoot

Cons

  • Ineffective waterproofing
  • Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit
  • Track and XC

Who should buy

The Newton Ridge Plus II WP is worth your attention if:

  • you need a more affordable option
  • you are an entry-level or recreational hiker who doesn't need a very technical boot just yet
  • you want a versatile outdoorsy boot for urban use, hiking, and yardwork

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot review

Who should NOT buy

Despite being very popular, this Columbia boot is not the best bet for:

  • Newton Ridge Plus II Waterproof
  • Newton Ridge Plus II Waterproof
  • Newton Ridge Plus II Waterproof

You will need more rugged and better-equipped footwear for the aforementioned use cases. That also means more expensive options like the Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX or the Hoka Trail Code GTX.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot lab test

Cushioning

Heel stack

According to Columbia's product specs, the Newton Ridge Plus II WP belongs to their "light cushioning" category which means that the midsole is minimally cushioned and feels close to the ground. That's why the boot is recommended for urban use and light hiking.

However, when we cut the boot in half and measured its stack height with a calliper, we found that it's not much thinner than the average hiking boot in our catalogue.

At 33.7 mm, its heel stack is merely 2-3 mm lower than the category average and offers decent impact protection for several hours of walking and hiking.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Heel stack
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 33.7 mm
Average 36.3 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
26.2 mm
Heel stack
46.9 mm

Forefoot stack

Measuring the boot's forefoot stack, we also got a higher-than-expected reading of 23.9 mm.

Stable and grounded base Fairbanks Mid (30.9 Measuring the boots forefoot stack, we also got a higher-than-expected reading of 23.9 mm).

We had to point that out because the brand's description may lead some people to think that the Newton Ridge is a minimalist type of boot.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Forefoot stack
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 23.9 mm
Average 22.9 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
17.0 mm
Forefoot stack
31.0 mm

Drop

But it does feel fairly grounded thanks to its firm midsole and a moderate heel-to-toe drop of 9.8 mm.

This offset creates a pretty balanced foot placement where the heel sits neither too high (which is common for backpacking boots) Track and XC.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Drop
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 9.8 mm
Average 13.4 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
0.6 mm
Drop
21.0 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Just like many other boots from Columbia, the Newton Ridge Plus II employs the brand's most common Techlite foam. It feels like a regular EVA blend but it stands out as a notably lightweight material (more on that in the Weight section).

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Midsole softness

Measuring its softness with a Shore A durometer, we got a reading of 33.5 HA which is firmer than many other hiking boots we've tested, including other options from Columbia.

It makes the boot more stable and grounded but detracts from the comfort for all-day walks and hikes.

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 33.5 HA
Average 28.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
14.7 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
53.3 HA

oz / 440g (%)

And if you intend to wear this Coumbia boot in low temperatures, be prepared for an even firmer ride.

Our lab tests showed that the Techlite foam lost 22% of its softness after spending 20 minutes in the freezer.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot oz / 440g (%)
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 22%
Average 20%
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
4%
oz / 440g
50%

Insole thickness

As a budget-friendly boot, the Newton Ridge uses a basic, moderately-padded foam insole. Measuring its thickness in the heel, our calliper showed 5.5 mm which is standard for a hiking boot.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Insole thickness
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 5.5 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
3.7 mm
Insole thickness
8.0 mm

Size and fit

Size

The Newton Ridge Plus II WP is worth your attention if true to size (195 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 39 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Comfortable step-in feel

The Columbia Newton Ridge Plus II WP felt rather close-fitting in our regular size (men's US 9) and width (D medium). So once the boot's gel mould solidified, we grabbed a calliper to find out why.

The tool showed 92.6 mm in the widest part of the mould (the area between the first and fifth metatarsals) which is slightly narrower than average.

We believe that hikers with medium-width feet won't have any issues with this width but those with wider feet can benefit from the wide version of this boot.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Comfortable step-in feel
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 92.6 mm
Average 93.9 mm
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
89.7 mm
Comfortable step-in feel
98.8 mm

you want a versatile outdoorsy boot for urban use, hiking, and yardwork

We also measured the mould's width closer to the front (near the big toe) in order to compare its toebox shape to other hiking boots.

With a calliper reading of 69.8 mm, the Newton Ridge tunred out to have a more pointy type of forefoot which explains the snugness we expereinced during the wear test. However, it's not critically tight for a medium foot shape and is also optimal for hikers with narrower feet.

But if you have bunions or wide feet, do opt for the wide version for extra space. Don't rely on a break-in period to loosen up the fit because the boot's leather has zero give to it.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot you want a versatile outdoorsy boot for urban use, hiking, and yardwork
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 69.8 mm
Average 71.2 mm
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
64.5 mm
you want a versatile outdoorsy boot for urban use, hiking, and yardwork
80.9 mm

Toebox height

The boot offers decent vertical space with a toebox height of 26.3 mm. It felt adequate despite being 2 mm lower than average.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Toebox height
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 26.3 mm
Average 27.4 mm
Compared to 22 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
22.7 mm
Toebox height
33.5 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Designed for very moderate hikes and casual use, the Newton Ridge Plus II WP lacks the technical stability elements of the more advanced outdoor boots.

But given its fairly simple construction, this Columbia boot offers decent lateral support for moderate terrain and lighter backpacks.

Torsional rigidity

The boot's firm platform and thick leather upper work together to generate some solid twist-proofing in the midfoot.

In our manual test, we rated the Newton Ridge's torsional rigidty with a high score of 4 (5 being the stiffest). This translates to a pretty supportive and confidence-inspiring underfoot experience on the trail.  

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 4
Average 4.4
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
1
Torsional rigidity
5

The Newton Ridge Plus II WP is worth your attention if

On the flip side, we wouldn't recommend this Columbia boot to hikers who:

  • have moderate-to-severe overpronation
  • carry heavy backpacks (30+ kg) on challenging/uneven terrain

That's because the ankle support is very minimal in the Newton Ridge Plus II WP.

Its entire rearfoot (both the heel counter and the ankle collar) are too pliable to provide any solid support in extreme situations. We could eaisly push and squeeze the boot's heel couner in our manual test which resulted in a below-average stiffness score of 3.

It feels like the boot's extended collar is only there to protect the ankle from scrapes and scratches but trifle more than that. It is a casual/entry-level hiking boot after all.

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 3
Average 3.6
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
1
The Newton Ridge Plus II WP is worth your attention if
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Difference in stiffness in cold.

Measuring the widest part of its midsole in the forefoot, our claiper recorded 115.9 mm which is notably wider than the average and is even on par with the chunky downpours and harsh winter conditions.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 115.9 mm
Average 111.5 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
96.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
124.6 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel of the Newton Ridge turned out to be equally wide with 88.5 mm in the widest area. It gave us a pretty solid footing without feeling too platformy.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Midsole width - heel
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 88.5 mm
Average 87.5 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
71.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.1 mm

Midsole softness in cold

Despite its leather upper and firm platform, the Newton Ridge bends much easier than a typical hiking boot.

To put a number on it, we used a shoe flexing tester to measure the amount of force it takes to bend the boot to a 30-degree angle. The machine returned 20.7N which is notably less than it takes on average.

This is yet another confirmation that this Columbia silhouette is more oriented towards comfort and recreation rather than long-distance performance.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Midsole softness in cold
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 20.7N
Average 31.8N
Compared to 26 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
12.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
65.7N

Midsole softness in cold (%)

We were equally surprised to find that this Columbia boot does not get much stiffer in freezing temperatures. Having exposed the boot to cold for 20 minutes. we repeated the force gauge measurement and the difference in flexibility was only 11%.

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 11%
Average 24%
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
3%
Midsole softness in cold
71%

Weight

Devoid of bulk and unnecessary features, the Newton Ridge Plus II WP happens to be lighter than average by 2.5 oz.

Weighing the boot in a men's US size 9, our scale showed a comparatively low reading of 16.5 oz (468g) but not as low as stated by the brand - 15.9 oz (452g).

On the hike, however, it felt very easy and non-taxing on the legs. Even lighter than its static weight suggests.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Weight
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 16.51 oz (468g)
Average 18.77 oz (532g)
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
11.71 oz (332g)
Weight
28.29 oz (802g)

Breathability

Even though the Newton Ridge is lined with Omni-Tech (Columbia's proprietary waterproofing), it's not equally effective throughout the boot.

During our wear tests, we couldn't help but notice that the tongue kept holding on to moisture instead of pushing it away! So when we took it to the lab for in-depth breathablity tests, all the puzzle pieces fell into place.

We noticed a streak of smoke passing through the seam at the base of the tongue which never happens in 100% waterproof hiking boots.

Columbia Newton Ridge Plus.

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 1
Average 1.3
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
1
Breathability
5

Waterproofing

Looks like we have some bad news in the waterproofing department as the Newton Ridge is only capable of handing shallow puddles, minor drizzles, and occasional splashes.

It's better to avoid major water exposure if you want to keep your feet nice and dry in this Columbia boot.

Durability

Toebox durability

The most high-wear areas of the boot are covered in PU leather. Even though it's not a top-grade type of leather, it proved to be more resistant to sharp bushes and rocks than textile or mesh.

In our abrasive durability test, we applied a Dremel with a sandpaper tip to the top of the boot's toebox at 5K RPM speed. After 12 seconds of drilling, the material showed very minor damage - the tool burned through the topmost PU layer without affecting the boot's integrity. Because of that we gave the Newton Ridge a high score for toebox durability - 4 out of 5!   

On the downside, this type of leather is prone to discoloration and creases which makes it less aesthetically pleasing with time.

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 4
Average 4.3
Compared to 37 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
1
Toebox durability
5

you want a versatile outdoorsy boot for urban use, hiking, and yardwork

The durability of inner lining is just as important as the exterior resilience if you want to experience a comfortable step-in feel for as long as possible. Because once that lining is torn, hot spots and blisters are just around the corner.

Unfortunately, we saw some significant wear and tear after applying our Dremel to the inner side of the Newton Ridge's collar for only 4 seconds. Assessing the damage, we couldn't rate the boot's heel padding durability with a below-average score of 3. Not much life expectancy here.

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 3
Average 3.6
Compared to 37 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
1
you want a versatile outdoorsy boot for urban use, hiking, and yardwork
5

Outsole hardness

The rubber blend of this Columbia boot turned out to be slightly softer than average with a durometer readig of 84.0 HC.

Softer rubbers tend to feel tackier on wet rocks and boulders but on the fip side, they are more prone to wearing off (as our next test confirms).

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Outsole hardness
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 84.0 HC
Average 87.1 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
81.0 HC
Outsole hardness
92.1 HC

Outsole durability

Considering the lower price point of the Columbia Newton Ridge Plus II WP, we kept our expectations low in the durability department.

That's why we weren't surprised to see how effortlessly the sandpaper bit into the boot's outsole rubber leaving a deeper-than-average dent of 1.3 mm.

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 1.3 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 34 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

It's good to see that the boot packs a very thick layer of rubber (3.7 mm) to extend its shelf life.

However, we would recommend staying away from concrete roads and rock-heavy trails if you want to get as much use out of this Columbia boot as possible.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Outsole thickness
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 3.7 mm
Average 3.0 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
1.8 mm
Outsole thickness
5.6 mm

Misc

Lug depth

The Newton Ridge features Columbia's proprietary Omni-Grip outsole with rather deep 4.7 mm lugs, based on our calliper measurements.

The boot's tread pattern is claimed to adapt to varied surfaces and we found it to be mostly true. It kept us pretty confident on moss-covered logs, loose rocks, and creek beds. However, its treading is not ideal for extra muddy terrain because it doesn't shed the dirt so easily. We also lacked some braking power on steep descents.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Lug depth
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 4.7 mm
Average 4.3 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
3.0 mm
Lug depth
6.0 mm

Price

The Newton Ridge Plus II WP is a budget-friendly boot from Columbia that offers excellent value for money. It is an ideal option for recreational hikers who don't need all the newest bells and whistles of technical hiking boots.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot price

Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot $100
Compared to 43 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
£110
Price
£350

Reflective elements

There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Reflective elements
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot No

Tongue padding

The Newton Ridge doesn't have much padding around the collar but it packs a generous amount of foam in its tongue. Our calliper recorded an above-average tongue thickness of 14.7 mm!

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Tongue padding
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot 14.7 mm
Average 11.2 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Merrell Moab 3 Mid GTX
5.9 mm
Tongue padding
15.1 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The boot has a fully-gusseted tongue which contributes to waterproofing and prevents small debris from getting inside the boot.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Tongue: gusset type
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Both sides (full)

Heel tab

A fabric finger loop is placed at the back to help with the on-and-off. However, it feels a little too frail.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Heel tab
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Finger loop

Removable insole

The insole of the Newton Ridge is easily removable in case you want to swap it for a custom orthotic.

Columbia There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Removable insole
Test results
There are no reflective elements on this Columbia boot Yes