New Balance Logo M Torba | Our verdict

A symbol of ingenuity, we found that the New Balance 574 has undergone countless spin-offs that can make a sneaker collection on their own. The classic provided us with excellent support and comfort for day-long use. Not to mention its adaptable style that can go with almost any of our outfits. We are convinced, NB 574 is another street-savvy NB kick that will remain classic and in style for years to come.

New Balance Logo M Torba Pros

  • New Balance small logo sweatshirt in grey
  • Budget-friendly
  • Suitable for all-day wear
  • Real suede
  • Highly durable
  • Stable and supportive
  • Great for wide feet
  • Easy to style
  • Numerous colour options

New Balance Logo M Torba Cons

  • Lacks breathability
  • Stiff and firm platform
  • Grey Silver on The Sole Womens app and always be aware of New Balance drop dates

Who should buy

In our opinion, it's hard to go wrong with the New Balance 574 if you are after the following:

  • new balance made 1978 main
  • new balance 327 todd snyder farmers market pineapple
  • a highly versatile kick that's available in numerous colour combinations

New Balance 574 review

Who should NOT buy

The NB 574 comes with a thick wedge EVA midsole that feels rigid and inflexible. Thus, this kick might feel unforgiving for those who prefer soft and flexible trainers. As an alternative, you may want to consider the 997H New Balance Logo M Torba 2002R.

The 574 may also be a disappointment if you are looking for a summer kick. We recommend going for a more breathable option like the PUMA RS-X.

New Balance 574 lab test

Cushioning

Heel stack

Aside from platform trainers, the New Balance 574 makes for one of the tallest stacks in our catalogue.

New Balance 574 Heel stack

Using a calliper, we measured the classic's heel height at an impressive 38.2 mm. This is taller than other popular kicks like the Reebok Classic Leather (35.7 mm) or the Adidas Superstar (26.8 mm).

Test results
574 38.2 mm
Average 30.2 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
16.9 mm
Heel stack
50.5 mm

Forefoot stack

In the forefoot, the 574 also proved to be taller than average. We measured the stack height here at 25.2 mm.

The funny thing is that this NB classic is thicker in the forefoot than some trainers are in the heel (like the Adidas Samba Trainers NEW BALANCE CM997HTC Black).

New Balance 574 Forefoot stack
Test results
574 25.2 mm
Average 19.2 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
9.7 mm
Forefoot stack
29.5 mm

Drop

Given the stack difference, we get a 13.0 mm drop in the 574. That's neither good nor bad as it is totally up to the wearer's preference. Some people like to feel their heels elevated while others prefer a more grounded, parallel-to-the-ground experience.

New Balance 574 Drop
New Balance 574

The NB 574 is going to feel slightly elevated in the heel but pretty balanced for most people.

Adidas Samba Drop
Adidas Samba
Test results
574 13.0 mm
Average 11.1 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
3.5 mm
Drop
17.2 mm

New Balance Logo M Torba | Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The 574 sneaker is a perfect example of a thick sole that tendr not equate to a cushioned sole.

We've got bad news for the fans of plush trainers - this New Balance offering feels quite firm underfoot.

Using a durometer, we measured the primary foam of the 574 at 44.0 HA.

New Balance 574 Midsole softness

This is among the firmest we've seen in our lab so far. For comparison, the PUMA RS-X new balance 327 orange blue grey release date info!

Test results
574 44.0 HA
Average 29.1 HA
waterproof walking classics from New Balance.
Compared to 76 trainers
Number of classics
15.0 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
46.4 HA

New Balance Core 500ml

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

You probably noticed that the midsole of the 574 consists of two layers of foam. Thus, we also measured the softness of the top layer (the one closer to the foot).

This foam turned out to be slightly softer than the lower layer. At 29.5 HA, it is actually 49% softer! AlHoops still firm, this top foam at least helps to make landings more pleasurable.

New Balance 574 New Balance Core 500ml
Test results
574 29.5 HA
Average 34.2 HA
waterproof walking classics from New Balance.

Insole thickness

Completing the classic's cushioning ensemble is a fairly padded insole. Being 4.7 mm thick, it is within the normal range for trainers.

New Balance 574 Insole thickness
Test results
574 4.7 mm
Average 5.1 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
3.1 mm
Insole thickness
11.5 mm

Size and fit

Size

Sneakers NEW BALANCE BB480LIB Bleumarin true to size (262 votes).

T-shirt New Balance Printed Impact Run vermelho preto?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 110 trainers
Number of classics
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

New Balance Impact Run Ss Tee T-Shirt

A classic NB sneaker with a classic NB fit, the 574 offers a super comfortabe and accommodating experience as well as alternative widths to treat all foot shapes.

Having made a replica of the classic's interiors, we were able to measure its dimensions precisely and compare them to other lifestyle trainers.

In the widest part, between the big toe and the pinkie, our calliper returned a standard reading of 90.9 mm. And while that's just an average width, the difference lies in the tip of the classic's toebox.

New Balance 574 New Balance Impact Run Ss Tee T-Shirt
Test results
574 90.9 mm
Average 92.3 mm
Compared to 75 trainers
Number of classics
85.4 mm
New Balance Impact Run Ss Tee T-Shirt
96.8 mm

Toebox width - big toe

The 574 offers plenty of wiggle room with its rounded (almost square) toebox shape. At 74.1 mm near the big toe, it is so wide that it exceed the average by more than 5 mm!

New Balance 574 Toebox width - big toe
Test results
574 74.1 mm
Average 68.8 mm
Compared to 75 trainers
Number of classics
63.9 mm
Toebox width - big toe
74.1 mm

Toebox height

On the downside, some people may find the classic's vertical space restricting. That's because its toebox height is only 25.4 mm.

New Balance 574 Toebox height
Test results
574 25.4 mm
Average 27.8 mm
Compared to 75 trainers
Number of classics
20.7 mm
Toebox height
35.0 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

New Balance was founded by an arch support specialist for a good reason. Stability or support is never an issue in trainers from this brand.

As you can see in the video, our heel remains firmly planted on the ground as we attempt to shift the foot side-to-side. Let's have a look at the factors contributing to this in the sections below.

Torsional rigidity

First and foremost, there is a lot of stiffness in the classic's platform. Twisting it sideways in our manual test, we could feel a great deal of resistance from the firm sole.

This led us to give this NB classic a solid 4 out of 5 for torsional rigidity.

Stiffer classics like this have a much smaller chance of letting your ankle roll over to the side. An extreme opposite case would be the women s new balance suede 574 sport classic lifestyle classics.

Test results
574 4
Average 3.6
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of classics
1
Torsional rigidity
5

In esclusiva per ASOS New Balance Brassière blu navy

The NB 574 takes really good care of your ankles. With double overlays and a plastic ENCAP at the bottom of the heel, we felt very securely held at the rearfoot.

Between 1 and 5, we rated the 574's heel counter stiffness as 3. It is not the stiffest but structured enough for sure.

Test results
574 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of classics
1
In esclusiva per ASOS New Balance Brassière blu navy
5

Midsole width - forefoot

A stable platform wouldn't be complete without a nice and wide base. And the 574 scores high here too!

At the widest part of the forefoot, our calliper measured 114.3 mm, which is a whole centimetre wider than other classic trainers like the Reebok Classic Leather (103.3 mm).

New Balance 574 Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
574 114.3 mm
Average 108.5 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
95.1 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
121.0 mm

Chinese New Year New Balance XC-72

This NB classic also proves to be fairly wide in the heel. We got 80.2 mm in the widest part of the sole, which is also on the wide side of the sneaker spectrum.

New Balance 574 Midsole width in the heel
Test results
574 80.2 mm
Average 83.6 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
67.7 mm
Chinese New Year New Balance XC-72
103.1 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

The Sneakers NEW BALANCE BB480LIB Bleumarin not the kind of sneaker that bends to your will so easily. The classic feels notably stiffer than minimalist trainers like the Adidas Gazelle.

To figure out exactly how much stiffer the 574 is, we used a classic flexing tester to measure the amount of force it takes to bend the classic by 30 degrees. With an above-average reading of 15.6N, this NB turned out to be a bit more rigid than a typical casual sneaker, but not by much. It still offered a fairly comfortable ride for longer walks.

New Balance 574 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
574 15.6N
Average 13.8N
Compared to 34 trainers
Number of classics
4.6N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
27.6N

Weight

From the look of it, it is only reasonable to think that the Sneakers NEW BALANCE BB480LIB Bleumarin a chunky boy. And yet, and yet...

The sneaker surprises us once again, this time on a scale. We measured the classic in a men's US size 9 and found that it weighs 13.9 oz (393g) which is within the average of low-top trainers.

new balance x 90 navy msx.

New Balance 574 Weight
Test results
574 13.86 oz (393g)
Average 13.76 oz (390g)
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
8.50 oz (241g)
Weight
20.49 oz (581g)

Breathability

New Balance Hoops Essential Свитер.

Trying out the 574 in warm temperatures, we couldn't wait to get it off, to be honest. Back in the lab, our experience was confirmed in a breathability test where we pumped smoke through the classic's upper to see how much of it passed through.

As you can see from the video, ZERO smoke is passing through the classic's seemingly mesh toebox. Only a little is able to escape through the gaps between the tongue and the classic quarters.

For that reason, we ended up giving the 574 a lower breathability score of 3 out of 5.

Oh, and never mind the "mesh" panels. These boys are so densely woven that they don't even let the light shine through!

Lookig at the toebox through our microscope...

New Balance 574 microscope

... there are no see-through perforations in sight.

New Balance 574 microscope mesh

Test results
574 3
Average 3
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of classics
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Leather/Suede quality

When we take a closer look at the quality of materials on the NB 574, it actually becomes easier to forgive the lack of breathability. For a £90 classic, we were impressed!

Equipped with a butane torch and a leather scratch awl, we tested the genuineness of materials in various parts of the upper. Our main point of interest was of course the suede. And it turned out to be real! Unlike the synthetic heel panel and the "N" logo, the suede didn't catch fire and stood up to the awl too.

Test results
574 Real suede

Toebox durability

The 574 did its wearers a huge favour by adding a very wide suede overlay on the toebox. It tendr a fantastic job of protecting the mesh layer underneath.

We can easily prove it in our durability test that involves a Dremel. Holding the tool against the suede at a consistent speed (10K RPM) and force (3.2N), we only got a small dimple!

Such amazing wear resistance earned the 574 a high score for toebox durability. On a 1-5 scale, where 5 is the most durable, we gave it a 4.

New Balance 574 Toebox durability result

Test results
574 4
Average 3.7
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of classics
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Inside, the 574 is lined with a plush and comfy fabric lining. That one should be easy to tear, right? Right?

Well, apparently, our Dremel struggled with that! After 4 seconds of drilling the fabric, the damage was really minor compared to what we usually see in trainers.

On a 1-5 scale, we rated the heel padding durability with a high score of 4.

New Balance 574 Heel padding durability test

Great news for those of us who often develop holes in this part of a classic!

Test results
574 4
Average 3.2
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of classics
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

A rugged, massive outsole is 574's signature. But is it just as sturdy as it looks? Hell, yeah!

To begin with, we measured the hardness of that rubber at 83.1 HC. This is not much harder than the average of trainers but it's a good start.

New Balance 574 Outsole hardness
Test results
574 83.1 HC
Average 85.7 HC
waterproof walking classics from New Balance.
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of classics
76.1 HC
Outsole hardness
94.0 HC

Outsole durability

The classic's outsole revealed its true nature in our demanding Dremel test. And it's a BEAST!

Drilling through the rubber for a good 22 seconds at a high speed of 10K RPM, it just couldn't be bothered!

According to our tread gauge, the depth of the dent is a mere 0.5 mm! For reference, most trainers end up with 1 to 1.5 mm of damage (like the Adidas Gazelle below).

New Balance 574 Outsole durability test
New Balance 574
Adidas Gazelle Outsole durability
Adidas Gazelle
Test results
574 0.5 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 93 trainers
Number of classics
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

But New Balance didn't stop there. The brand decided that a few millimetres of rubber was not convincing enough and packed as much as 8.2 mm into the 574!

This is one of the thickest rubber outsoles we've ever seen on a sneaker! It is also pretty aggressively lugged and is ready to outlast many other trainers on the market. Especially, in its price range!

New Balance 574 Outsole thickness
Test results
574 8.2 mm
Average 5.3 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
2.9 mm
Outsole thickness
8.6 mm

Misc

Grip / Traction

As long as you don't try to conquer ice and slush in the NB 574, it should provide just enough grip for most occasions.

New Balance 574 Lug depth

Its lugs may seem aggressive but they are definitely not deep or sharp enough for slippery conditions.

Reflective elements

No shining in the dark.

New Balance 574 Reflective elements
Test results
574 No

Tongue padding

Measuring the tongue padding, our calliper returned 4.6 mm.

New Balance 574 Tongue padding

Even Hoops it is about the same as average, we felt a little bit of lace pressure through it, especially when cinched tightly.

New Balance 574 flex

Test results
574 4.6 mm
Average 9.3 mm
Compared to 94 trainers
Number of classics
0.7 mm
Tongue padding
23.0 mm

Sprint Faster with the New Balance Vazee Verge

The tongue tendrn't have any gussets (attachments) on the sides. Unfortunately, this resulted in slight shifting of the tongue sideways in our case.

New Balance 574 Sprint Faster with the New Balance Vazee Verge
Test results
574 None

Heel tab

No heel tab at the back but we didn't find it a necessity in the 574.

New Balance 574 Heel tab
Test results
574 None

Removable insole

Because New Balance started out as an insole company, they know how to make these inserts right. We enjoyed the 574's stock insole but if you need your own orthotic, it can be swapped easily.

New Balance 574 Removable insole
Test results
574 Yes

Style

In 1988, New Balance released the 574 as an advanced running classic with a notable design. This iteration was a hybrid that blended the best details of New Balance's well-known running kicks, namely the New Balance 575 and 576 models.

new balance hoops graphics.

New Balance 574 laces

Ever since then, the 574 has undoubtedly become one of the brand's most iconic pairs in sneaker history. And even Hoops it can be lost in the shadow of much more hyped releases like NB 550, the 9060, and the 2002R, New Balance Løpesko Fresh Foam More V3.

Especially for its unbelievably affordable price tag!