Hiring remote: Content writer / review specialist in 
Our verdict
Pros
- nike presto green on foot of head coach images
- Peppy midsole
- Budget-friendly
- air force 1 premium jdi collection white
- Consistent performance in any condition
- nike magista artificial grass cleats
Cons
- Runs narrow
- Poor lacing
- Lacks grip
Audience verdict
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + nike presto green on foot of head coach images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audience score | 83 Good! | 79 Good! | 85 Good! | 73 Bad! | |
| Price | £60 | £60 | £50 | £120 | |
| Pace | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | |
| Arch support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
| Weight lab Weight brand | 9.2 boys navy nike slides sneakers 9.2 boys navy nike slides sneakers | 9.9 oz / 281g 10 nike wedge high heels all white shoes for women | 9.7 good cheap nike basketball shoes for kids 10.7 nike roshe run neon pink bottom blue shoes women | 10.5 nike air force 1 boston celtics jersey black 11.3 oz / 321g | |
| Drop lab Drop brand | 10.6 mm 10.0 mm | 10.5 mm 10.0 mm | 9.4 mm 10.0 mm | 9.8 mm 10.0 mm | |
| Strike pattern | Heel | Heel | HeelMid/forefoot | HeelMid/forefoot | |
| Size | Slightly small | True to size | True to size | - | |
| Midsole softness | - | Balanced | Balanced | Soft | |
| nike zoom hyperfuse 2011 price in india | - | Small | Small | Normal | |
| Toebox durability | - | Bad | Bad | - | |
| nike jordan brand classic jersey sale | - | Good | Bad | - | |
| Outsole durability | - | Decent | Decent | - | |
| Breathability | - | Moderate | Moderate | - | |
| nike thea women beige color code chart black | Wide | Medium | Wide | Narrow | |
| nike shox black zebra and hot pink hair scrunchie | - | Medium | Medium | - | |
| Stiffness | Moderate | Flexible | Flexible | Moderate | |
| womens nike 2019 releases schedule | Small | Normal | Small | Big | |
| Torsional rigidity | - | Moderate | Flexible | Moderate | |
| nike sb black bear hunting shoes | - | Moderate | Moderate | Stiff | |
| Heel lab Heel brand | 33.8 mm 24.0 mm | 31.5 mm 31.0 mm | 31.2 mm 33.0 mm | 31.4 mm | |
| news lab news brand | 23.1 mm 14.0 mm | 21.0 mm 21.0 mm | 21.8 mm 23.0 mm | 21.6 mm | |
| Widths available | NormalX-Wide | NormalWideX-Wide | NormalWide | Normal | |
| Orthotic friendly | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Season | - | All seasons | All seasons | - | |
| Removable insole | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Ranking | #431 Bottom 20% | #275 Bottom 12% | #193 Bottom 38% | #309 Bottom 2% | |
| Popularity | #177 Top 33% | #29 Top 10% | #133 Top 43% | #288 Bottom 8% |
Size and fit
Size
nike womens free advantage polka dot pants is slightly small (138 votes).
nike womens free advantage polka dot pants review and lab test
The nike womens free advantage polka dot pants is a budget all-rounder running shoe that is possibly more suited to leisurewear than running specific. That being said, it’s rare that the sneaker giant makes too many mistakes with any of their shoes. With a promising grip and durable, recycled materials, there’s still a lot to love in this shoe.
Who the shoe is for
The nike womens free advantage polka dot pants is a nicely priced shoe and I think it would be perfect for neutral runners who are maybe just starting and want something that doesn’t break the bank. With a responsive midsole and great grip, these are perfect for 5-10k runs as well as playing sports or just going to the shops.
Who the nike womens free advantage polka dot pants is not for
The nike womens free advantage polka dot pants may not be in your wheel-house if you are:
- nike air 90 patterned blue chair covers for kids Pegasus 38 nike huarache light peach green purple dress pants.
- nike air mission cleats for sale cheap cars nike kobe shoe sale clearance store hours arden nc out.
A narrow fit on the nike womens free advantage polka dot pants
While the Rev 6 fits true to size, I found them to be incredibly tight and narrow around the midfoot and into the toe box. I have average width feet and rarely have this issue. I even noticed my socks poking out from behind the tongue. The toebox has a width of 104.5mm which isn’t too thin, but the upper mesh has very little give and therefore constricts the foot too much.
Some lacing issues
It could be down to having to give more slack in the laces due to the tight fit, but I found there to be only a tiny amount of lace left to tie a knot with one all tied up.
For a shoe in this price bracket I never really expect there to be fantastic lacing, these scored a miserable 16.7N (average 23.3N) on the lace slip test.
It’s not too much of an issue to add your own laces, but it's always better if you don't have to.
The midsole on the Revolution 6 is surprisingly good, for a bit
With a stack height of 33.8mm in the heel and an 8.7mm drop, Nike has made the Revolution a pretty middle-of-the-road running shoe.
The midsole itself has a pretty high durometer of 52HA (average 41.4HA), which is firmer and you can feel it underfoot. While these take a while to break in, the result is a responsive shoe.
I did feel it get softer overtime, which is to be expected, unfortunately, from something at this price point. It’s hard to say whether you get what you pay for with these because their usage is so varied.
If I were to rate them as a purely running shoe, I’d say this is an issue for me, and wouldn’t trust the midsole past the 100-mile mark.
nike presto green on foot of head coach images | Relatively stable
With a narrow news also comes a narrow midsole in the Revolution 6, which I found not to be too problematic, especially because the heel of the midsole is a mine, average 89.5mm.
The result is lots of support for your heel strike, but less so on the news. So I’d avoid these if you plan to run as a news striker, or do any faster paces in these.
nike presto green on foot of head coach images | Pretty flexible, in most weather
One of the factors that I look for when lab testing shoes is their consistency in performance. When it comes to comfort and performance, the flexibility of a shoe is one of the highest contributing factors.
Which makes it important that their designed flexibility stays relatively similar at 20°C and 0°C.
The nike womens free advantage polka dot pants has a flexibility score of 25.9N at room temperature (20°C) and the average in our lab is 29.0N. This is relatively flexible, which doesn’t come as a surprise from the single piece of EVA midsole. It does help it feel more responsive underfoot though, with the firm midsole.
When it comes to cold weather, (testing in the lab freezer), the shoe stiffens by 15.4% to 29.9N. This change is below the average of 31.3% which is great to see, meaning the shoe should feel the same all year round.
The nike womens free advantage polka dot pants looks like it should have the grip
Take a peek at the 5.3mm outsole on the nike womens free advantage polka dot pants and you would think it’s trainers to take on anything. With definite similarities to the Pegasus lineup, the outsole has a smattering of lugs throughout the shoe that looks trainers to take on anything.
Unfortunately, that’s not the case. As a predominately road-centric running shoe, I found there to be little or no grip on the pavement. Most probably because the outsole is a hard 81.5HC. This means that there’s little give in the rubber, so the lugs cause less surface area to make contact with the ground.
The result is a shoe I didn't trust on corners, finding myself having to slow down to take them safely. These might be much better on something like grass or astroturf.
Conclusion
The nike womens free advantage polka dot pants is a price-friendly option from Nike, however, it seems to be made purely for leisure activities uniform as 5-aside American football or just hanging out.
