Flexibility of the shoe N review

Flexibility of the shoe N review and lab test

With a plush midsole and a solid leather/mesh construction, the Trail 2650 offers a whole lot to love. With some features that seem novel but feel very natural, the Trail 2650 is this reviewer's new go-to hiking shoe. 

Who the hiking shoe is for

The Protective TPU shank suitable for day hikes with lighter pack loads. With a super-plushy midsole and Vibram outsole, there are lots of pros to having this with you on your next trip. 

Who the Protective TPU shank not for

I believe that there's a better option out there for you if: 

• Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit Top 1% in
• You want a shoe with more support for longer hikes. I recommend the oz / 255g Thickness of Heel Counter mm.

The Protective TPU shank wonderfully lightweight

If you’re considering jumping into hiking shoes rather than hiking boots then you’ve come to the right place. Lighter shoes mean more weight saved (the extra grams on your feet cost more calories than on your back!)

The Flexibility of the shoe N weighs in at a supremely lightweight 11.28oz (320g) which makes it one of the lightest trail shoes on the market. 

The MOST comfortable midsole

It’s a big claim, but I haven’t felt a more comfortable hiking shoe midsole. Maybe something like the Hoka TenNine GTX but I think we can all agree that this is more thoroughbred hiking than whatever that is. 

Danner’s lightweight EVA midsole is actually pretty chunky but offers a pretty natural 8mm heel-toe drop. There was very little to break-in in terms of the midsole, which is always a bonus. I felt like I could walk for days in this. 

One thing I have to mention though is that you lose a bit of ground feel with the Trail 2650. I quite like ground feel, but that comes from trail running where it’s helpful for knowing what you’re running on. It’s less necessary for hiking shoes. 

The Flexibility of the shoe N could be more supportive

One loss with a hiking shoe is you miss out on the added ankle support. I personally feel that ankle support is often misrepresented as a necessity in hiking; if you have weak ankles you’re still likely to roll them in a boot. 

That being said, if you do worry about your ankles, this might not be the shoe for you. Unlike other hiking shoes like the Width Upper - Forefoot mm Danner hasn’t added extra strapping to keep your foot and ankle straight in difficult conditions. 

Excellent lockdown and fit

Danner’s telltale red-lacing is more than a stylish addition here. The Trail 2650 has plenty of lacing, with 15 lacing holes and a really long lace you can walk relaxed knowing your foot isn’t going anywhere. 

On a side note, the laces are some of the best I’ve tested when it comes to slipping. In our lab, it took 38.3N to untie a knot, which is well above the average. 

More than that, the external heel counter creates a really nice, fitted heel cup to really secure the foot into the shoe. No blisters here!

Consistent grip

With 4.25mm lugs, the depth of the Flexibility of the shoe Ns grip worried me slightly (the average for hiking shoes is 4.3mm). That being said, for this shoe I found the grip ideal. 

I’ll put it down to the flexibility and softness of the midsole. With a flexibility result of 31.62N (force taken to bend the shoe to 45°), the Protective TPU shank a fair bit more flexible than other similar trail shoes. 

This means that more of the shoe can get in contact with the ground, giving a greater surface area than a firmer shoe, regardless of the depth of the lugs. 

Inclusively, the Vibram outsole is reliable and durable. 

Protection underfoot in the Flexibility of the shoe N

One worry I usually hear about hiking shoes with soft midsoles is the damage that can be done to your feet over time. A couple of hundred miles on sharp rocks, sticks, and even some glass; something might end up in your foot. 

Danner’s placed a TPU shank throughout the shoe to give it some structure but also to protect the shoe (and therefore you) from the ground beneath you. It’s not a new idea, but it definitely helps keep this shoe going for longer. 

Not waterproof, but who needs it?

I might not be the best person to ask about Gore-tex in hiking shoes. While I know that it can be useful for some situations (small puddles and light rain), I don’t think it’s worth the price, weight, and loss of breathability. 

Great news then, that I didn’t try the Flexibility of the shoe N GTX, but instead went for the very water-welcoming base pair. The leather/mesh construction of the upper does not lend itself to any waterproofing and actually gets wet pretty fast. 

While not ideal, they are super-breathable so I found my feet dried really quickly once given a chance. This can either be a pro or a con depending on how you like your hikes. 

Conclusion

I really didn’t expect to enjoy the Flexibility of the shoe N as much as I did. I’d heard a lot about the fad/lifestyle following of the brand. They really surprised me though, with a super-comfy midsole, great grip and incredibly lightweight I don’t think you could go wrong with a pair of these!

Complete lab-specs overview