Our verdict

The Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole is the Swiss brand's second attempt at crafting a shoe that can devour miles on the trails. We were impressed by its build quality, the incredibly breathable upper, and the comfortable experience it delivers, not only in running but also in hiking and walking. However, at $180, we expected more cushioning, less weight, and better energy return from the shoe. In our experience, while the Cloudultra 2 has some standout features, it seems On still has some room for improvement.

Pros

  • Exceptionally breathable
  • Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole
  • Handy lace tab
  • Can handle faster paces if needed
  • oz / 265g
  • Consistently stable ride
  • Made with high-quality materials
  • Smooth transitions

Cons

  • A bit heavy for its use
  • Not ideal for winter conditions
  • Price might be steep for some

Audience verdict

89
Great!

Who should buy

We think the Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole is a great choice for:

  • Loyal On enthusiasts seeking a versatile shoe capable of tackling multiple distances and various paces across all terrains.
  • Runners in search of a stable running experience who prefer not to opt for a wide platform and are comfortable with firm cushioning.
  • oz / 280g.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole

Who should NOT buy

If you're aiming for peak performance in your next ultra, the Cloudultra 2 might not be the best fit. Its Helion foam doesn't quite match up to the market's leading options, and our assessment is that other high-priced shoes like the Nike Ultrafly and the Saucony Endorphin Edge outperform it, especially with their superfoams and carbon plates.

Moreover, based on our analysis, the Cloudultra 2 might feel too heavy for many runners. Competing brands offer similar or more cushioning in much lighter packages, such as the oz / 295g.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

We approached the weight issue critically because this shoe can't really use the maximalist approach as an excuse. With only 30.2 mm of stack height, it's actually lower than the average shoe.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole heel stack

While this might seem too low by today's standards, it works fine if you're running on soft surfaces like dirt roads or loose gravel paths. However, for really long runs on asphalt or tarmac, we don't think they're the best choice, and something like the We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests oz / 296g.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Heel stack
Test results
Cloudultra 2 30.2 mm
Average 32.1 mm
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
19.6 mm
Heel stack
42.4 mm

Forefoot stack

In the forefoot, we also encountered a lower-than-average stack, measuring just 20.0 mm.

Our thoughts mirror what we mentioned about the heel—while it's great for soft surfaces, it falls short on harder ones, especially if you're a midfoot or forefoot striker.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Forefoot stack
Test results
Cloudultra 2 20.0 mm
Average 24.5 mm
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
13.4 mm
Forefoot stack
33.9 mm

Drop

Stiffness in cold.

This design seems more suited for heel strikers, a notion further reinforced by the low stack in the forefoot.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Drop
Test results
Cloudultra 2 10.2 mm
Average 7.6 mm
Compared to 132 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
17.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Now, let's circle back to the midsole. The Cloudultra 2 features On’s Helion foam, a league of EVA and Olefin Block Copolymers. It's integrated into the Cloudtec cushioning, paired with the classic TPU Speedboard for enhanced energy return and stability.

Despite the collapsible Cloud system, the ride leans towards the firmer side (30.3 HA). So, if you're a fan of plush, marshmallow-like midsoles, this one might not be for you. However, as mentioned earlier, this shoe shines on soft surfaces where the firmer midsole really seems to make sense for us.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Midsole softness
Test results
Cloudultra 2 30.3 HA
Average 22.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 109 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
9.1 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
39.0 HA

Midsole softness in cold soft to firm

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

After storing the shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes next to our ice creams, we conducted another durometer test. The foam, measuring at 30.5 HA, seemed almost unchanged to us, even during our subsequent testing.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Midsole softness in cold soft to firm
Test results
Cloudultra 2 33.4 HA
Average 28.1 HA
Compared to 109 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
11.8 HA
Midsole softness in cold soft to firm (soft to firm)
48.4 HA

Midsole softness in cold soft to firm (%)

That's just a minor 10.3% difference, making it absolutely imperceptible to anyone, regardless of how chilly it gets outside. It appears to us that blending EVA, which typically underperforms in cold temperatures, with OBC was a brilliant move.

Test results
Cloudultra 2 10%
Average 26%
Compared to 109 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
5%
Midsole softness in cold soft to firm
68%

Insole thickness

We observed that the insole is a bit thinner than what we typically see, coming in at a measurement of 3.6 mm.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Insole thickness
Test results
Cloudultra 2 3.6 mm
Average 4.7 mm
Compared to 132 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
2.1 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Size and fit

Size

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole is true to size (12 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 110 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width at the big toe

When we first tested the shoe both in the lab and on the trails, the toebox felt average to us. However, our job is to measure things, so we noted that the widest part of the upper measures 97.3 mm.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole oz / 280g
Test results
Cloudultra 2 97.3 mm
Average 98.9 mm
Compared to 122 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
92.0 mm
Toebox width at the big toe
104.9 mm

Consistently stable ride

Next, we shifted our calipers to the big toe area for another measurement.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole toes

Here, we discovered the shoe maintains a wider profile than average at 79.5 mm, not tapering much. This wide design confirms our thoughts—it should offer unparalleled comfort for at least 90% of runners even during ultra distances, except for those with exceptionally narrow or wide feet.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Cloudultra 2 79.5 mm
Average 79.3 mm
Compared to 84 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
70.5 mm
Consistently stable ride
90.1 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

With its low stack height and a relatively firm midsole, coupled with supportive features like a rigid heel cup just above the foam in the heel that envelops the entire shoe, we couldn't help but enjoy a remarkably stable ride.

Can this shoe work for those needing support? It really depends on the extent of your pronation or supination. However, for most runners, we think so.

Torsional rigidity

Many trail running shoes tend to favor a rigid design, and we anticipated the same from the Cloudultra with its firm midsole and TPU Speedboard plate.

Surprisingly, we discovered the exact opposite—a flexibility rating of 2 out of 5. The shoe is impressively flexible from a torsional perspective, making it a fantastic choice for those who get sore feet from rigid shoes with stiff components.

This flexibility also enhances the shoe's performance during turns, as being too rigid can hinder agility.

Test results
Cloudultra 2 2
Average 3.6
Compared to 127 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

outperform it, especially with their

We also rated the Cloudultra 2 low in the heel counter stiffness test, scoring it just 2 out of 5. This is excellent news for those who prefer shoes without stiff heel counters.

Test results
Cloudultra 2 2
Average 3.1
Compared to 125 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
1
outperform it, especially with their
5

Hoka Speedgoat 5

The forefoot measures 110.9 mm, which is pretty average. On typically makes narrow shoes, so we're pleased with this measurement. It's ideal for running straight and also works well for taking sharp corners.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Cloudultra 2 110.9 mm
Average 112.4 mm
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
102.1 mm
Hoka Speedgoat 5
124.3 mm

Number of shoes

However, the heel is quite narrow at 85.8 mm, which could pose a stability issue for heel strikers needing more support. If a wide heel is a must-have for you, you might want to consider the We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests. It offers a much larger platform and is also geared for ultra distances.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Cloudultra 2 85.8 mm
Average 89.7 mm
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
77.2 mm
Number of shoes
106.0 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

We were impressed with the flexibility in our previous torsional test, but what about its longitudinal flexibility?

In our 90-degree bend test, the Cloudultra 2 required only 17.6N to reach the desired point. That's exceptionally low, positioning this shoe as an excellent choice for hiking or walking. It's perfect for those seeking a versatile, do-it-all shoe—you can even take it to the gym!

Test results
Cloudultra 2 17.6N
Average 27.2N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
10.5N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
54.5N

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole is

A bit heavy for its use.

Test results
Cloudultra 2 22.4N
Average 36.1N
Compared to 130 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
11.9N
Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole is
77.5N

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole is (%)

That's a 27.3% increase in stiffness, which might be slightly noticeable but isn't a cause for concern, especially considering the shoe's multi-purpose design.

Test results
Cloudultra 2 27%
Average 33%
Compared to 130 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
3%
Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole is
90%

Weight

In terms of weight, the Cloudultra 2 hit 10.4 oz (296g) on our lab scale, which, frankly, seems a bit excessive for the amount of midsole it offers.

Even though weight might not be a major concern for some ultrarunners, shedding an ounce would have been a much-welcomed improvement for v3.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Weight
Test results
Cloudultra 2 10.44 oz (296g)
Average 10.23 oz (290g)
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
7.51 oz (213g)
Weight
12.66 oz (359g)

Breathability

One of the biggest mistakes a shoe designed for ultramarathons can make is lacking breathability—after all, our feet really need airflow during those looong hours of running.

That's why we were thrilled with the outstanding breathability (5/5) the Cloudultra 2 offers. Sure, some might lean towards a denser upper in a trail shoe, but it's crucial for us to remember this shoe is made not just for trail running, but also for ultra distances.

Our light test further showcased the superb airflow of this upper. What's more, this isn't limited to the toebox—the impressive ventilation extends to the midfoot, which is a huge advantage for enduring dozens of miles without blisters and hotspots.

Now, let's zoom in under the microscope to get a closer look at this engineered mesh upper.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole microscope

It's crafted from a multi-layered, square mesh that cleverly mixes different yarns, achieving a perfect balance of structure and ventilation.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole microscope

Inside, there's an additional layer that boosts comfort and durability, yet it's thoroughly perforated to maintain airflow. It's evident that On prioritized an airy upper, despite the potential trade-offs like durability.

Test results
Cloudultra 2 5
Average 3.2
Compared to 110 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Now, you might think that with such massive ventilation, durability would take a hit, right?

But to our surprise, when we ran the Dremel test (3.2N @ 5K RPM) in the lab, it scored 2 out of 5. While this is below average and might let down some trail runners, we actually see it as a positive outcome for a mesh this breathable.

The multi-layer construction guarantees that even if the upper's top layer suffers damage, there will still be underlying layers maintaining the shoe's structure and shape.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Toebox durability
Test results
Cloudultra 2 2
Average 3.1
Compared to 90 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding area scored a solid 3 out of 5 in the same Dremel test—a really good result that promises long-lasting durability in this part of the shoe.

So, you can feel confident knowing it's highly unlikely to wear out a hole, regardless of the socks you choose.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Heel padding durability
Test results
Cloudultra 2 3
Average 2.8
Compared to 88 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

Now, let's take a look at the outsole, starting with its hardness.

In our Shore C durometer test, we clocked it at 82.4 HC. This is slightly softer than most shoes, but it's still quite hard and should offer good durability.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Outsole hardness
Test results
Cloudultra 2 82.4 HC
Average 85.7 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
75.5 HC
Outsole hardness
96.1 HC

Outsole durability

On is known for their premium pricing, so naturally, we expect top-notch features. While there have been times we've felt let down, this isn't one of them. The Missiongrip outsole demonstrated a performance that's nothing short of miraculous in our tests.

After putting it through the Dremel test, we observed a mere 0.1 mm of rubber wear, which is truly breathtaking.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Outsole durability
Test results
Cloudultra 2 0.1 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 83 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Finally, we measured the thickness and it came in at 1.7 mm. Given the incredible durability of this outsole, that thickness now seems almost excessive.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Outsole thickness
Test results
Cloudultra 2 1.7 mm
Average 2.3 mm
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
5.5 mm

Misc

Lug depth

The almost-indestructible Missiongrip outsole of the Cloudultra 2 features lugs that measure just 2.5 mm, which is fitting for a shoe designed for ultra distances on non-technical terrain.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole lugs

In fact, the outsole resembles that of a road running shoe more than a trail shoe, with some exposed foam and On's typical central channel. The lugs are perfect squares, making them great for flat terrain but not as effective for uphill and downhill running.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Lug depth
Test results
Cloudultra 2 2.5 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
1.5 mm
Lug depth
5.8 mm

Reflective elements

The shoe comes with bright reflective On logos, making sure you're visible at night. Lovely!

Test results
Cloudultra 2 Yes

Tongue padding

On opted to slim down the Cloudultra by skimping on tongue padding, resulting in a really thin 2.7 mm thickness.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole laces
For those who like using it, the tongue includes a convenient lace tab that also works great for getting a proper fit before every run.

This could be a problem for those who often face instep issues, like lace bite.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Tongue padding
Test results
Cloudultra 2 2.7 mm
Average 6.4 mm
Compared to 133 trail running shoes
trail running shoes
1.3 mm
Tongue padding
12.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue boasts a sock-like design, seamlessly integrated into the shoe—perfect for those seeking a snug, unified fit.

It's also fantastic for trail running, especially amidst small rocks and debris, as it keeps them from getting inside the shoe.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Cloudultra 2 Sock like

Heel tab

At the back, there's a handy finger-loop heel tab that makes it easier to slide your feet into the shoe.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Heel tab
Test results
Cloudultra 2 Finger loop

Removable insole

The insole of the Cloudultra 2 can be easily taken out as it's not glued to the midsole. This means if you need extra arch support, you can use your custom orthotics with these shoes.

Long-lasting Missiongrip outsole Removable insole
Test results
Cloudultra 2 Yes