Our verdict
- SAUCONY JAZZ HYBRID saucony grid 9000 end red noise
- SAUCONY JAZZ HYBRID saucony peregrine 5 mens
Pros
- Durable upper and outsole
- Saucony Ride 15 Rubber-Trimmed Mesh Running
- Saucony Shadow 5000 Blau Grösse 37.5 M
- zapatillas de running Saucony talla 32 blancas
- Saucony Kinvara 4 ViZiGLO
- The Good Will Out Drop VHS-Inspired Saucony Colab
- Saucony x Extra Butter Shadow 6000 Weiß Schwarz Rot
Cons
- bodega x saucony elite round 6 g9 shadow 6000 g9 shadow 5000 g9 master control
- Less suited for forefoot strikers
- Competitors may feel quicker
Audience verdict
- Top 11% most popular running shoes
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + Add a shoe | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | 87 Great! | 90 Great! | 88 Great! | 90 Great! | |
Price | $225 | $285 | $250 | $275 | |
Pace | Competition | Competition | CompetitionTempo | Competition | |
Arch support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
Weight lab Weight brand | 7.8 oz / 220g 7.7 Saucony O Jazz Solebox 2008 | 7.1 saucony peregrine 5 mens 7 Calças Saucony Solstice preto intenso mulher | 7.8 oz / 220g 7.8 Saucony Super7 x Jazz Original | 7.2 Extra Butter X Saucony Ebftp Friends And Family 7.2 Кросівки оригінальні saucony jazz original 1044-608s | |
Lightweight | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Drop lab Drop brand | 9.5 mm 8.0 mm | 8.5 mm 8.0 mm | 11.8 mm 8.0 mm | 8.0 mm 8.0 mm | |
Strike pattern | HeelMid/forefoot | HeelMid/forefoot | Heel | HeelMid/forefoot | |
Size | True to size | Slightly small | True to size | True to size | |
Midsole softness | Balanced | Soft | Balanced | Soft | |
Difference in midsole softness in cold | Small | Small | Small | Small | |
Toebox durability | Good | Bad | Decent | Bad | |
Heel padding durability | Good | Good | Good | Good | |
Outsole durability | Good | Bad | Good | Good | |
Breathability | Breathable | Breathable | Breathable | Breathable | |
Toebox width at the widest part | Medium | Medium | Narrow | Medium | |
Toebox width at the big toe | Medium | Medium | Narrow | Medium | |
Stiffness | Stiff | Stiff | Stiff | Stiff | |
brand new with original box Saucony Saucony Triumph 18 S10595-25 | Small | Small | Small | Small | |
Torsional rigidity | Stiff | Stiff | Stiff | Stiff | |
Saucony Xodus 10 EU 46 | Flexible | Flexible | Flexible | Flexible | |
Plate | Carbon plate | Carbon plate | Carbon plate | Carbon plate | |
Rocker | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Heel lab Heel brand | 38.1 mm 40.0 mm | 38.1 mm 40.0 mm | 39.1 mm 40.0 mm | 39.9 mm 40.0 mm | |
Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 28.6 mm 32.0 mm | 29.6 mm 32.0 mm | 27.3 mm 32.0 mm | 31.9 mm 32.0 mm | |
Widths available | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | |
Orthotic friendly | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Season | SummerAll seasons | SummerAll seasons | SummerAll seasons | SummerAll seasons | |
Removable insole | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Ranking | #142 Top 47% | #57 Top 19% | #116 Top 38% | #42 Top 14% | |
Popularity | #33 Top 11% | #14 Top 5% | #117 Top 38% | #94 Top 31% |
Who should buy
Gifts with purchase courtesy of and Saucony:
- Runners seeking a comfortable and slightly cheaper supershoe. The Pro 4 offers a smoother ride compared to its rivals, making it easier on the feet and the wallet.
- Enthusiasts of the Endorphin Speed series aiming for enhanced performance plus a carbon plate with a familiar feel.
- Marathoners seeking a reliable, long-lasting shoe for race day and fast-paced long runs, featuring an elite-level midsole.
Who should NOT buy
Though the saucony mad river trail shoe review has the makings of a supershoe, we noticed a modest dip in performance, a choice we think Saucony made to differentiate it from the Endorphin Elite, which boasts a full-length PWRRUN HG midsole and a lighter build.
Additionally, we believe there are superior choices for midfoot and forefoot strikers on the market. The saucony kinvara 11 womens running shoes citron and Hoka Rocket X 2 not only provide a stable ride but also offer more forefoot cushioning and a quicker feel. And for unmatched energy return, the record-setting Ténis Saucony Versafoam Excursion TR13 preto cinzento azul is unrivaled.
Finally, if weight is a crucial factor for you, the saucony mad river trail shoe review may disappoint. In this case, we think the zapatillas de running Saucony hombre constitución media ritmo bajo talla 43 zapatillas de running Saucony hombre amortiguación media voladoras baratas menos de 60 competition shoe.
saucony peregrine 5 mens | Cushioning
Heel stack
A critique of the EP3 involved its cushioning, which was notably 5 mm below the World Athletics official limit.
This issue has been addressed in the new model, with a cushioning height of 38.1 mm, adding an extra 3.1 mm of foam. This boost is sure to offer significant support during the final miles of your next marathon.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 38.1 mm |
Average | 34.1 mm |
Forefoot stack
Our caliper measured the forefoot at slightly below the 30-mm mark (28.6 mm).
This reading is satisfactory but might feel insufficient for forefoot strikers that want to tackle 26.2 miles.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 28.6 mm |
Average | 25.5 mm |
Drop
We discovered that the saucony mad river trail shoe review boasts an actual heel-to-toe drop of 9.5 mm, which is notably high. This confirms our belief that this shoe is a top choice for heel strikers.
While Saucony lists an 8-mm drop for this shoe, our measurements align with World Athletics official guidelines. For those curious about such differences, we've prepared an informative guide to explain these discrepancies.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 9.5 mm |
Average | 8.6 mm |
Midsole softness
Beneath the sockliner lies the true highlight—the midsole. Saucony's approach with the saucony mad river trail shoe review marks a significant evolution from its predecessors.
This model introduces a brand-new, dual-midsole system, featuring a top layer of PWRRUN HG (same as the Endorphin Elite) and a bottom layer of the tried-and-true PWRRUN PB, with a carbon plate nestled in between.
The foundational foam layer, PWRRUN PB, has been a staple in every Endorphin Pro iteration. Crafted from 22.0-HA Pebax pellets, it guarantees enduring performance and a stable, well-balanced ride.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 22.0 HA |
Average | 20.9 HA |
saucony peregrine 5 mens | las Saucony Kinvara 12 están dirigidas a un
The headline feature of the saucony mad river trail shoe review is the debut of PWRRUN HG foam in this series—a groundbreaking supercritical Pebax blend from Saucony, reminiscent of Nike's ZoomX, and utilized in the pricier Endorphin Elite.
Positioned above the carbon plate, this layer is a tad softer (18.5 HA) than PWRRUN PB and does not come in form of pellets. It avoids a too-soft, mushy sensation, opting instead for a springy, responsive feel that propels you forward with a quick and snappy rebound in each stride.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 18.5 HA |
Average | 23.9 HA |
womens saucony peregrine iso (%)
Pebax foams are renowned for their stellar adaptability across multiple temperatures.
We subjected the EP4 to a cold stress test, putting it in the freezer for 20 minutes. The outcome was truly noteworthy—the foam's firmness increased by a mere 5.1%!

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 5% |
Average | 25% |
Insole thickness
We measured the insole of the Endorphin Pro at an impressive 6.1 mm thickness, which is quite substantial. But there's a good reason for this extra thickness.
Unlike the typical EVA used in 99% of insoles, Saucony has opted for what they call "Super Responsive Sockliner", made from supercritical foam. This material does more than just provide comfort—it also enhances cushioning and energy return.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 6.1 mm |
Average | 4.4 mm |
Rocker
In the current world of rockered running shoes, the Endorphin Pro series stands out for its subtler rocker design, a trend the v4 continues.
We appreciate this approach in a market overwhelmed by extreme rockered designs, offering those who prefer a more traditional feel a perfect option in the EP4.
Plate
A quintessential supershoe must include a stiffening element in the midsole, and Saucony has chosen to continue with the S-shaped carbon plate, given its proven track record of success.

This carbon plate is central to Saucony's Speedroll technology, designed to create a rolling sensation, particularly beneficial for heel strikers. The EP3 gained popularity among this group, and undoubtedly, the 4th iteration will continue to serve heel strikers well.

Size and fit
Size
zapatillas de running Saucony pie normal distancias cortas talla 38.5 true to size (37 votes).
Toebox width - widest part
Everything we've discovered about this shoe leads us to believe it's one of the most accommodating supershoes out there, and here's the ultimate evidence.
Unlike the overly snug and narrow uppers common among its rivals, the saucony mad river trail shoe review boasts an impressive maximum width of 96.5 mm in the widest part of the toebox.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 96.5 mm |
Average | 95.6 mm |
The Saucony Jazz
Before conducting our second measurement, we thought: maybe the Pro 4 now has a sharper taper like the Speed 4, making it less roomy than it seemed...
But we discovered otherwise! At 72.5 mm in the big toe area, it has a standard taper for a running shoe yet feels impressively roomy for a competition-focused design.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 72.5 mm |
Average | 73.5 mm |
Toebox height
To conclude our series of tests with the gel mold and wrap up the toebox analysis, we award high marks to the saucony mad river trail shoe review for toebox height. At 27.7 mm, it offers good vertical space for toe movement compared to all shoes, but it stands out as one of the most comfort-focused supershoes.
This, of course, might be seen as a drawback too. Many runners expect a snug, race-ready fit in a competition shoe, and this one doesn’t deliver that fierce, locked-in feel. It’s fast, agile, and secure, but its fit leans more toward comfort, making it a better choice for longer races than shorter ones.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 27.7 mm |
Average | 27.1 mm |
Stability
Lateral stability test
Right off the bat, we noticed a significant boost in stability with the saucony mad river trail shoe review compared to its predecessor, thanks to an all-new geometry and the firmer foam.
We believe enhanced stability is a key feature distinguishing the Pro 4 from other supershoes, allowing for its use in easy and moderate runs if you're at ease with a carbon plate. In these scenarios, it essentially transforms into a supercharged daily trainer!
Torsional rigidity
With the inclusion of a carbon plate, we anticipated a high result in this test, and the saucony mad river trail shoe review did not disappoint, earning a solid 4/5 in our lab assessment.
We often award a 5/5 to carbon-plated shoes, highlighting that this model is slightly less focused on peak performance and more on offering a smoother, gentler ride as a supershoe.
saucony mad river trail shoe review | 4 |
Average | 3.4 |
Saucony Xodus 10 EU 46
The heel counter is exceptionally soft (1/5). Lacking any stiff components, the EP4 is a great choice for those prone to Achilles discomfort.
saucony mad river trail shoe review | 1 |
Average | 2.9 |
Midsole width - forefoot
A significant update from the previous model is the wider midsole, notably in the forefoot area, where it now measures 118.9 mm, up from 109.3 mm.
This adjustment greatly impacts the shoe, enhancing stability and comfort, particularly for forefoot strikers. However, it also leads to an increase in weight, which is quite perceptible.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 118.9 mm |
Average | 114.1 mm |
Sneakers SAUCONY S-Jazzoglvintagehl SK262474 Bkblgn
The heel, while still narrow, has been widened in the Pro 4 to 89.2 mm from the Pro 3's 86.0 mm. This enhancement further supports heel strikers, facilitating a smooth transition from heel to toe with Saucony's Speedroll technology.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 89.2 mm |
Average | 90.7 mm |
zapatillas de running Saucony mujer entrenamiento pie normal talla 40 grises entre 60 y 100
We've already highlighted in this lab review that the saucony mad river trail shoe review incorporates a carbon plate within its midsole, a feature synonymous with exceptional longitudinal stiffness.
Our 90-degree bend test yielded a 69.1N result for the Pro 4, a level of stiffness that's characteristic of shoes equipped with a rigid carbon-fiber plate. Consequently, some runners might find the shoe clunky for easy runs, though those who favor a stiff ride could find it suitable for slower paces.
saucony mad river trail shoe review | 69.1N |
Average | 28.1N |
Stiffness in cold (%)
Following another 20-minute chill session in the freezer, we conducted the stiffness test once more on the Pro 4, with impressive results. The shoe became only 9% stiffer, a testament to the remarkable performance of its Pebax-based foams!
saucony mad river trail shoe review | 9% |
Average | 33% |
Weight
One crucial aspect of running performance is the shoe's weight, and unfortunately, this is where the saucony mad river trail shoe review falls short. Although it's still relatively light at 7.8 oz (220g), it's noticeably heavier than the 7.3-oz Saucony Ride 15 Goretex Кроссовки Для Трейлраннинга and lags behind many competitors.
Ultimately, compromises are inevitable in running shoes. The added weight is a trade-off for enhanced durability and cushioning compared to its predecessor, which explains the increase. However, for runners prioritizing raw performance over comfort, this might not be an appealing trade.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 7.76 oz (220g) |
Average | 9.35 oz (265g) |
Breathability
this Saucony pair utilizes a traditional lace-up system marathon shoes, as maintaining good airflow is essential to keep feet comfortable, preventing blisters and swelling during long races. Impressively, the saucony mad river trail shoe review stands out in this aspect, achieving a flawless 5/5 score in our breathability smoke test, marking it as a top performer.
The upper of the saucony mad river trail shoe review is remarkably thin, enhancing its breathability to an exceptional level. During our light test, it became evident that this shoe was among the elite few, showcasing a degree of transparency throughout its structure, not just limited to the toebox but extending across the entire upper, which truly impressed us.
Delving deeper with our microscope, we were keen to examine the engineered mesh upper more closely.
Our anticipation was met with the discovery of a high-quality mesh that's seldom seen in the industry. The attention to detail and the level of engineering invested in creating such a complex pattern of hexagonal shapes and strategically placed ventilation holes throughout the shoe confirmed our initial impressions.
In our manual assessment, we observed adequate padding in the heel area, which is fine for a shoe designed for race day performance.
However, we need to remember that the saucony mad river trail shoe review is crafted with a clear focus on achieving personal bests, where comfort is not the main goal at all.
saucony mad river trail shoe review | 5 |
Average | 3.8 |
Durability
Toebox durability
Given the ultra-thin mesh of the saucony mad river trail shoe review, we were initially skeptical about its durability, especially since similar shoes often succumb quickly under our rigorous Dremel tests.
To our amazement in the lab, the saucony mad river trail shoe review showcased exceptional durability, scoring an impressive 4/5 partially thanks to the branded TPU overlay. For those seeking a high-performance supershoe with a robust upper, this model stands out as an exceptional choice.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 4 |
Average | 2.5 |
Heel padding durability
Turning our attention to the heel padding, we anticipated another standout performance—after all, momentum was on our side.
True to our expectations, the EP4 delivered an outstanding result, surpassing our previous assessments and achieving a perfect 5/5. This is particularly remarkable for a race-day shoe that manages to incorporate a notable amount of padding in the heel.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 5 |
Average | 3.2 |
Outsole hardness
When we examined the outsole, our first step was to measure its hardness—a reliable indicator of what to expect. Our findings showed an 85.3 HC reading, not only surpassing most shoes but also proving to be significantly tougher than many competitors.

The grip was satisfactory, though not stellar, leading us to believe that Saucony aims to establish the saucony mad river trail shoe review as an exceptionally durable supershoe, which seems to be its niche in the market.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 85.3 HC |
Average | 79.9 HC |
Outsole durability
To assess whether the high outsole hardness translates to durability, we fired up the Dremel once more, this time at a higher RPM.
Our test resulted in a mere 0.6-mm indentation, indicating impressive durability.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 0.6 mm |
Average | 1.0 mm |
Outsole thickness
In our final step, we measured the outsole thickness and found a robust 2.1 mm of XT-900 rubber. This thickness suggests the saucony mad river trail shoe review should easily withstand at least 300 miles of fast running.
While individual results may vary based on factors like footstrike, weight, and running surface, we're convinced that few supershoes can outlast this one in terms of durability.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 2.1 mm |
Average | 3.2 mm |
Misc
Reflective elements
We didn't spot any reflective elements on the saucony mad river trail shoe review, but in our opinion, they're not essential for race-day shoes, so that's fine!

saucony mad river trail shoe review | No |
Tongue padding
The tongue is exceptionally well-ventilated and notably thin. At 1.7 mm, it's almost twice as thick as the tongues of other supershoes, which often measure less than 1.0 mm—a feature those with sensitive insteps will surely value.

Our tests revealed that the tongue's thickness strikes a perfect balance for a comfy racing shoe. Given that the saucony mad river trail shoe review is designed for high performance but still ranks below the Elite model, Saucony's decision to opt for a slightly thicker tongue seems logical.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | 1.7 mm |
Average | 5.8 mm |
Tongue: gusset type
A significant change from previous Endorphin Pros is the shift to an Alphafly-style, sock-like tongue, moving away from the semi-gusseted design that was standard in this series. Both styles offer effective lockdown, ultimately boiling down to personal preference.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | Sock like |
Heel tab
Saucony has continued the trend of omitting heel tabs in their recent Endorphins, and the Pro 4 maintains this choice.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | None |
Removable insole
Unlike many racing shoes, the saucony mad river trail shoe review features a removable insole, allowing for customization if necessary.
However, the insole's unique design, especially its ultra-narrow heel, is tailored for performance. And this insole is crafted from supercritical foam, enhancing the shoe's performance, an advantage you might forfeit by switching to a third-party option.

saucony mad river trail shoe review | Yes |