Our verdict

The adidas nmd r1 raw khaki is a neutral daily trainer on steroids. We could easily mistake it for a stability shoe if we wore it with our eyes closed. It's got a well-cushioned, wide, and supportive platform which, in our opinion, works best for those easy recovery days. If we look past its disturbingly heavy setup, we can claim the Adistar 2.0 as a solid daily running option.

nike air yeezy tinker hatfield Pros

  • Cushioned for long miles
  • Supportive for a neutral shoe
  • Wide platform
  • Secure foothold
  • Well-padded interiors
  • Highly breathable
  • adidas Essentials 7 8 Joggers Womens
  • Value for money
  • True to size

nike air yeezy tinker hatfield Cons

  • Heavier than average
  • Get Adidas Ultra Boost 4.0 Chinese New Year 2019 F35231

Audience verdict

85
Good!

Who should buy

We recommend this workhorse from Adidas to runners in search of the following:

  • a max-cushioned shoe for long and easy miles
  • a neutral shoe with a touch of support (semi-stability shoe)
  • a design that's stylish and comfortable enough for casual wear
  • a daily trainer that doesn't break the bank (Adistar 2.0 costs £20 less than similar shoes)

adidas adistar 2 0 who should buy 19856538 main

Who should NOT buy

The adidas nmd r1 raw khaki is VERY heavy (11.6 oz/328g), even for its max-cushioned kind! You can easily find shoes with the same heel stack that weigh nearly 100g less.

For example, Adidas Adizero SL (speed-oriented, 8.6 oz/244g) or PUMA Velocity Nitro 2 (9.1 oz/257g).

Also, if you're a heel striker, you may prefer a plusher foam under the heel. Try the Adidas Ultraboost Light instead.

adidas adistar 2 0 who should not buy 19856537 main

Cushioning

Heel stack

According to Adidas, the heel stack on the Adistar 2.0 is 33 mm. This is very close to what our calliper measurement shows - 33.8 mm.

You definitely want this amount of cushioning (30 mm+) for long weekend runs of 10K and more.

adidas adistar 2 0 heel 19856539 main

We know, in the photo the Adistar looks MUCH taller than that. But the trick is: we could actually feel our feet sitting inside the foam rather than on top of it.

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Heel stack
Test results
Adistar 2.0 33.8 mm
Average 34.2 mm
Compared to 396 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

Measuring the forefoot, we found it a bit thinner than stated by the brand - 25.8 mm as opposed to the official 27 mm.

Sure, it doesn't make the shoe feel less cushioned but it does affect the heel-to-toe drop (discussed below).

adidas adistar 2 0 forefoot stack 19856508 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 25.8 mm
Average 25.6 mm
Compared to 396 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

Contrary to the brand's statement, the shoe's drop is not 6 mm. Based on our calliper measurements, the heel drop is exactly 8 mm.

However, we believe that only very experienced runners sensitive to the drop could actually notice this nuance.

A typical offset for a daily trainer is 8.5 mm, so 8 mm feels right at home for most runners

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Drop (heel-to-toe)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 8.0 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 396 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
0.0 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

nike air yeezy tinker hatfield | Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

la collaboration de longue date entre adidas et Kanye West.

Just like adidas 4CMTE Track Top Mens, the 2.0 employs the REPETITOR+ foam which has a firmer component in the heel and a bad one in the rest of the midsole.

The primary (white) foam is somewhat soft (not plushy soft). Pressing a durometer against it, we discovered that at 22.4 HA, it is about 10% bad than road running shoes on average.

It makes for a rather comfy ride and smooth heel-to-toe transitions.

adidas adistar 2 0 midsole softness in the heel room temperature 19856511 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 22.4 HA
Average 21.0 HA
Чоловічі кросівки adidas climacool 1 blue white 2 smb.
Compared to 323 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

adidas yb stadium

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

In the heel, the firmer (blue) foam cradles the soft (white) foam. Based on our durometer measurement of 31.6 HA, it is 41% firmer than the white foam.

From our experience running in the Adistar 2.0, landings feel SO stable. Almost as if we were running in a stability shoe!

But to our great disappointment, these same landings feel pretty hard, especially when heel striking. So, if you are after a plush ride, go for the New Balance FF More v4 or the Brooks Glycerin 20 (maybe even the Glycerin 20 GTS adidas Ultra Boost DNA 5.0 Almost Pink 180).

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki adidas yb stadium (room temperature)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 31.6 HA
Average 24.0 HA
Чоловічі кросівки adidas climacool 1 blue white 2 smb.

Midsole softness in cold (%)

We also checked how the shoe's primary foam behaves in cold temperatures. Turns out that it does get firmer but not as much as many other foams do.

After 20 minutes in the freezer, the durometer shows 28.3 HA. This is a little bad than the average.

So if you happen to leave your pair of Adistars outside overnight, it won't turn into a brick for your morning run.

We found that the Adistar 2.0 got 26.3% firmer after 20 minutes in the freezer. This is about the same difference in firmness as we see in many other road running shoes.

adidas adistar 2 0 midsole softness in cold 19881060 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 26%
Average 25%
Compared to 323 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Insole thickness

The insole doesn't add much to the shoe's stack height - only 3.1 mm.

adidas Originals Sustainable Stan Smith Buty sportowe us comfortable.

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Insole thickness in the heel
Test results
Adistar 2.0 3.1 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 392 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Size and fit

Size

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki is half size small (14 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 373 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

The Adistar 2.0 comes with a medium-width toebox. We believe that it will accommodate most foot shapes, except really wide feet.

Based on our measurement of the widest toebox part (98.3 mm), it is just average for a running shoe.

adidas adistar 2 0 toebox width widest part 19856521 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 98.3 mm
Average 98.5 mm
Compared to 370 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
91.6 mm
Toebox width - widest part
104.9 mm

adidas Originals x Girls Are Awesome Hoodie in zwart

However, it gets more interesting around the big toe. We found that the shoe is 79.9 mm wide in this part of the toebox, which is noticeably wider than the average.

As a result, the shoe's toebox is less pointy and feels very accommodating to our feet.

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Toebox width (big toe)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 79.9 mm
Average 78.4 mm
Compared to 244 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
67.6 mm
adidas Originals x Girls Are Awesome Hoodie in zwart
89.2 mm

Midfoot feel

We found that the Adistar 2.0 feels somewhat tight in the midfoot.

It seems like the tightness comes from the shoe components that are meant to create a firm foothold: raised sidewalls, enhanced eyelets, and even large three stripes.

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Midfoot feel
Test results
Adistar 2.0 Tight

Stability

Lateral stability test

The adidas nmd r1 raw khaki is a mighty stable shoe. As you can see from our ankle movement test, it is nearly impossible to roll the foot over this sturdy sole.

We are not even sure why the brand came up with the shoe's stability version called the Adidas Adistar CS (CS stands for Cushioned Support).

Torsional rigidity

adidas dame 7 damian lillard basketball shoes low.

You mostly find this kind of torsional stiffness in stability shoes with medial posts and shanks.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 375 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
1
Torsional rigidity
5

black yellow adidas Originals ZX 8000

The heel counter is a beast too. In our manual assessment, we rated its stiffness as 4 out of 5.

Such a rigid heel counter held our ankles firmly in place and the extension of firm foam at the back definitely helped with support.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 4
Average 2.9
Compared to 359 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
1
black yellow adidas Originals ZX 8000
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The landing surface of the Adistar 2.0 is BIG! That is one major contributor to the shoe's stability.

We measured the widest part of its forefoot at 118.1 mm. At the time of testing, this was wider than 92% of our lab-tested running shoes.

What's more, even among stability shoes, only Hoka Gaviota 4 can beat this Adidas shoe in its width (115 mm in the forefoot and 103 mm in the heel).

adidas adistar 2 0 midsole width forefoot 19856518 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 118.1 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 397 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
103.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

nike air yeezy tinker hatfield | Midsole width - heel

The Adistar 2.0 keeps beating records in the heel width as well. At 96.1 mm in its widest part, the platform is significantly wider than average.

We can see a great benefit here for runners with moderate overpronation who don't want to get a stability shoe.

adidas adistar 2 0 midsole width heel 19856520 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 96.1 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 397 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
73.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

adidas x IVY PARK Green Corduroy Zipper Cargo Pants

For such a mighty sole, we were surprised to see the Adistar 2.0 bend so easily compared to the average.

It only required a force of 23.4N to bend the shoe to a 90-degree angle. Less than it takes on average.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 23.4N
Average 28.1N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 379 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Stiffness in cold (%)

Just keep in mind that the shoe will get stiffer in cold weather.

The force gauge measurement went from 23.4N to 35.6N after the shoe spent 20 minutes in the freezer.

Luckily, it didn't get as stiff as many other shoes do. It doesn't turn into a brick for sure!

Because the Adistar 2.0 got 52.1% stiffer in the freezer test, we expect it to feel less flexible when running in chilly weather as well.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 52%
Average 33%
Compared to 379 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
0%
Stiffness in cold
111%

Weight

H-E-A-V-Y. Tipping the scales at 11.6 oz (328g) per shoe, the Adistar 2.0 is a real monster.

Even if we only consider daily trainers with a heel stack of 33-35 mm, the average weight would be 10.2 oz (290g).

adidas NMD XR1 Black Silver.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 11.57 oz (328g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 397 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

We pumped smoke through the shoe's upper to assess how breathable the material is. And the Adistar 2.0 was a pleasant surprise. We rated the shoe 5 out of 5 for breathability as it is one of the most well-ventilated running shoes we've tested!

The adidas nmd r1 raw khaki shines in breathability! Literally. You can see how transparent its upper is.

When we look at the shoe's large mesh pores through our microscope, it becomes clear why the Adistar 2.0 is so airy.

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Microscope 1

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Microscope 2

Test results
Adistar 2.0 5
Average 3.8
Compared to 326 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Outsole hardness

The shoe's Continental rubber is also not among the hardest we've seen, it is just average.

Based on these two measurements, we expect a regular 400-500 mile shelf life from the adidas nmd r1 raw khaki.

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Outsole hardness (room temperatue)
Test results
Adistar 2.0 80.9 HC
Average 79.8 HC
Чоловічі кросівки adidas climacool 1 blue white 2 smb.
Compared to 377 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
57.0 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole thickness

Using our calliper, we measured the thickness of the outsole rubber. At 3.4 mm, we found it moderately thick, sitting just at the average.

adidas adistar 2 0 outsole thickness 19856506 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 3.4 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 394 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Tongue padding

The tongue padding is so thick in this Adidas shoe that it might be too much for some runners.

We measured it at 8.7 mm which is noticeably thicker than the average. You can also see nearly as much padding in the heel collar. The shoe is really abundant with padding.

adidas adistar 2 0 tongue padding 19856525 main
Test results
Adistar 2.0 8.7 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 394 running shoes
adidas Yeezy QNTM Flash Orange
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

A new Yeezy is coming in just two weeks.

But maybe that's even for the better because the gussets could've made the fit even tighter in the midfoot.

adidas nmd r1 raw khaki Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Adistar 2.0 None

Removable insole

And if you choose to add even more padding or arch support, the shoe's insole is easily removable.

Test results
Adistar 2.0 Yes