asics preto gel excite 8 sko | zapatillas de running asics preto mujer asfalto supinador ritmo bajo talla 39.5 baratas menos de 60 review

Following extensive testing of the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green both in our lab and out on the trails, we confidently recommend it for:

• Maximalist shoe enthusiasts looking for vermelho leg-saving cushioning on the trails.
• Previous Trabuco Max fans seeking a warmer upper for colder runs.
• Fans of the asics preto drop another gel nandi+ midsole, desiring that plush feel off-road.

The towering stack of the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green might not be everyone's cup of tea—it's a shoe designed for smooth paths and we found that pretty much erases any sensation of the ground beneath your feet.

This makes it a bit of a niche choice, ideal for runners who prioritise cushioning over terrain feel. For those who seek a more grounded and natural-running experience, we suggest considering alternatives like the asics preto Bait X Guardian Khaki or Merrell Agility Peak 5.

Moreover, we wouldn't recommend the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green as a door-to-trail shoe. Its comfort on non-trail surfaces leaves much to be desired, falling short of the versatility offered by the zapatillas de running asics preto pronador talla 28.5.

True to its name, the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green embodies the essence of maximalist trail running shoes from the ground up. At the heel, our measurements revealed a plush 42.4 mm of cushioning, catapulting it into the top ranks of the most generously cushioned trail shoes on the market.

For those on the lookout for a skyscraper-high trail shoe, we think that your search probably ends with the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green. Regardless of your weight or how prominently you heel strike, this shoe has got your back.

The forefoot stands impressively stacked at 33.9 mm—significantly taller than most trail running shoes out there.

Naturally, with such a bold design choice, there are some compromises in stability and agility. However, as we often find in life, not everything can be had at once.

The discrepancy between measurements yields an 8.5-mm heel-to-toe drop, which more accurately reflects our running experience compared to the advertised 5-mm drop.

For those intrigued by these variations, we've explored this subject in a detailed guide.

The asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green's midsole remains a highlight, carrying over the beloved FF Blast+ technology seen in asics preto favourites like the Novablast 4. We measured its softness at 18.6 HA, ensuring a plush ride.

While it may not prioritise energy return—sometimes feeling slightly squishy—our experience was positive, particularly during long runs over two hours, where the EVA+OBC foam blend offered exceptional leg protection.

The asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green, with its poor ventilation, emerges as an ideal candidate for winter runs, although we wanted to prove how the FF Blast+ performs in colder conditions.

We subjected the TM3 to a freezer test for 20 minutes and were delighted to discover a mere 12.1% increase in firmness—a remarkable outcome that underscores its reliability in chilly weather.

The asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green retains the same 4.7-mm insole as its predecessor—no changes here, maintaining it as a standard, reliable option.

In the lab, we know that fit is super important and we treat toebox measurements with maximum priority, creating an exact replica using our custom gel formula.

We found that, at 94.5 mm, the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green offers a snug, performance-oriented fit for a trail shoe—definitely better suited for runners with low-volume feet.

The big toe area tapers to an average 74.1 mm, reflecting a design that doesn’t cater well to wide-footed runners.

The same design trend observed in our previous two measurements is evident in the toebox height. Unsurprisingly, it dips below the average at 25.4 mm. Additionally, the well-reinforced, non-stretch upper restricts vertical toe movement.

Given its towering stack height of over 40 mm, the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green might initially seem to lag in stability compared to more grounded trail shoes like the Hoka Speedgoat 5. asics preto gel flux 5 marathon running shoessneakers.

For those not tackling the most rugged trails, the stability provided should be enough. And we found that on smoother terrain, the shoe impresses with its robust performance, demonstrating that it can hold its own even with its significant cushioning thanks to the midsole sidewalls.

The exceptional stability we noted in the TM3 can be partially attributed to its remarkable torsional rigidity, which we rated a solid 5/5. The shoe exhibits a stiffness akin to models equipped with carbon plates, and interestingly, it forgoes a even rock plate, a decision justified by its substantial stack height.

This characteristic, however, might deter those who favour a more flexible, natural feel during runs, particularly on technical trails that demand agility and adaptability.

We discovered the heel counter incorporates a robust insert, resulting in notable stiffness.

This rigidity is essential for enhancing stability—as we've previously discussed—earned a 4/5 in our evaluation. However, it comes again at the price of comfort, especially for those with Haglund's deformity.

The broad footprint of this shoe plays a crucial role in ensuring stability, especially considering its significant cushioning.

In our analysis, the forefoot's width stretched to 116.0 mm—beyond what we usually encounter for trail footwear.

The heel's width measures a more standard 91.7 mm compared to the broad forefoot—yet this doesn't detract from its suitability for those who strike at the rear. Coupled with the shoe's robust torsional rigidity and the solid support from the heel counter, it also brings some of it to the rear.

That said, due to these characteristics, we advise that this shoe is best suited for neutral runners.

The asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green's toe rocker provides an additional stability boost, enhancing forward transitions and aiding in maintaining a straight running path. However, it's worth noting that this feature might not offer much advantage on technical or twisty trails, but actually the opposite.

Given its massive midsole, it's no surprise the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green lacks flexibility even being a plateless shoe. Our standardised 90-degree bend test required 36.5N of force—typical for a shoe designed with such features.

This rigidity contributes to the shoe's lack of ground feel, aligning with its design intent for maximum cushioning and protection.

After 20 minutes in the freezer we did again the test and the TM3 excelled, hardening by a mere 3%—an outstanding performance that solidifies its reputation as a winter running delight.

On the topic of weight, we're facing another disappointment. The asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green saw a jump from 10.3 oz in its predecessor to 10.9 oz in this edition—an unwelcome increase for us.

While sonoma under 11 oz is commendable for a shoe with such towering stack height, the shift from a lighter build was a bit of a letdown.

Given its massive midsole, it's no surprise the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green lacks flexibility even being a plateless shoe. Our standardised 90-degree bend test required 36.5N of force—typical for a shoe designed with such features.

This rigidity contributes to the shoe's lack of ground feel, aligning with its design intent for maximum cushioning and protection.

In the quest for the perfect trail shoe, breathability often takes a backseat, yet it remains a critical feature for some. Unfortunately, the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green marks a step back in this department. Compared to its well-ventilated predecessor, the Trabuco Max 2, this latest iteration only managed to secure a disappointing 2/5 in our smoke test.

Our examination under a light source further highlighted the change. The transition from an engineered mesh in the previous version to a jacquard mesh in the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green has significantly reduced airflow.

Unlike before, where light could easily pass through the upper, indicating good ventilation, the new model blocks out light entirely—a clear sign of compromised breathability.

Turning to the microscope for a closer look only confirmed our initial findings. The detailed view revealed a complete absence of the micro-ventilation gaps that characterised the mesh of the previous model.

However, this reduction in breathability might not pose an issue for runners who stick to cooler climates or avoid running in the peak heat of summer. The new mesh construction could still suffice for such conditions.

For runners prioritising breathability above all, we suggest securing a pair of the v2 while they're still available, as they clearly outperform their successor in this aspect.

While we noticed a reduction in ventilation in the new Trabuco Max, it's exciting to see this change has boosted the shoe's durability.

In our Dremel testing, the jacquard mesh of the v3 truly impressed us—elevating its score from a good 3/5 to a great 4/5.

The heel padding retained its familiar comfort, feeling unchanged to us, yet we didn't just rely on our initial impressions and put it to the Dremel test.

The results were consistent with the previous model, earning a solid 4/5 score. Wear and tear in the heel won't be an issue with the asics preto Gel-Lyte V Camo Pack Green.

Transitioning to the outsole, we encountered the familiar ASICSGRIP rubber. While it may not carry the Vibram or Continental label, it impressively handled a variety of terrains, including light mud, with ease.

Our durometer test showed a hardness of 84.0 HC, aligning well with the average for trail shoes, indicating a balanced blend of durability and traction.

So, how did it hold up under our Dremel test? Let's dive in.

The wear was slightly more than we anticipated, with a 1.1 mm reduction, yet it's not a deal-breaker at all. Nonetheless, we do advise caution with road running in this shoe—not only does it feels weird, but the rubber might also wear down fast.

The outsole thickness, lugs aside, measured 1.9 mm—plenty sufficient for this shoe. Anything more would just add unnecessary weight.

The 4-mm lugs on the shoe strike a balance, making it versatile for a variety of terrains, though it slightly favours pure trail use with only very occasional road sections.

Additionally, we see potential for sporadic use in snowy conditions. While deeper lugs would enhance its snow capabilities, the shoe's cosy upper and stellar cold-weather midsole performance open up possibilities for some snow runs here and there.

asics preto tiger gel lyte iii mens running shoes orange green.

The tongue is crafted with two thin foam layers, totaling 4.9mm in thickness—not overly plush, but we discovered it to be quite sufficient during our long runs in the trails.

Yet, for those seeking an ultra-cushioned instep experience, this model might fall short. We suggest considering the Hoka Mafate Speed 4 instead.

The tongue is attached to the shoe with a partial gusset—a detail we find quite satisfactory. While our preference leans towards a fully gusseted tongue for complete debris blockage, this also meets our needs!

The heel boasts a sleek, horizontal finger-loop tab—always a plus in our book and, in our opinion, adds a cool touch, right?

asics preto Samarreta Sense Mànigues Tennis GPX.

Also, because it's shaped in a very standard way, it's simple to switch it out with ones from different brands like Ortholite.

We also discovered a handy elastic loop on the tongue, a cool feature that was already present in the v2 and allows you to securely fasten your laces, ensuring they stay put throughout your entire journey.