Our verdict
- Flexibility / Stiffness at 10.9 oz
Pros
- Superior grip for intense movements
- Ultra lightweight for a tennis shoe
- Superior grip for intense movements
- Very secure lockdown and foothold
- Breathable for summer sessions
- However, considering how tough the competition is, we are not so sure. The
- Highly flexible forefoot
- Comfortable in-shoe feel (ergonomic insole)
Cons
- Falls short of durability (for the price)
- Not a lot of cushioning
- Snug toebox fit (but available in wide)
Audience verdict
- Both are speed-oriented shoes as well hard court tennis shoes
- Asics Solution Speed FF 3 Babolat tennis shoes
- Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market
Comparison
The most similar tennis shoes compared
+ + We were amazed at how much confidence this Babolat shoe gave us considering its very light weight | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | 93 Superb! | 87 Great! | 89 Great! | 79 Good! | |
Price | $150 | $140 | $140 | $80 | |
Shoe type | All CourtHard Court | All CourtHard Court | All CourtHard Court | All CourtHard Court | |
Construction | Speed | Speed | Speed | Stability | |
Breathability | Breathable | Moderate | Breathable | Breathable | |
Weight lab | 11 hard court tennis shoes | 11.7 oz / 332g | 10.9 oz / 309g | 11.3 Top pick in | |
Lightweight | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Drop lab | 10.1 mm | 10.7 mm | 9.8 mm | 10.2 mm | |
A series of disappointments continue with the frail inner lining of the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
And keep in mind that its flex grooves are part of the shoes flexibility system as well | Narrow | Medium | Narrow | Narrow | |
Size | - | - | Slightly small | True to size | |
Midsole softness | Balanced | Firm | Firm | Balanced | |
Stiffness | Flexible | Flexible | Moderate | Moderate | |
Torsional rigidity | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Asics Solution Speed FF 3 | Stiff | Stiff | Stiff | Flexible | |
is the best alternative | Average | Very narrow | Very narrow | Narrow | |
hard court tennis shoes | Average | Very narrow | Average | Narrow | |
Outsole durability | Bad | Bad | Good | Decent | |
Asics Solution Speed FF 3 | Bad | Good | Good | Bad | |
Flexibility / Stiffness | 28.3 mm | 30.2 mm | 28.3 mm | 28.6 mm | |
Forefoot | 18.2 mm | 19.5 mm | 18.5 mm | 18.4 mm | |
Insole thickness | Thin | Thin | Average | Average | |
Removable insole | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Heel tab | None | Highly flexible forefoot | Highly flexible forefoot | None | |
Toebox durability | Decent | Good | Good | Bad | |
Outsole hardness | Average | Average | Average | Average | |
Outsole thickness | Average | Very thin | Thin | Average | |
Ranking | #1 Top 4% | #13 Top 49% | #10 Top 38% | #22 Bottom 18% | |
Popularity | #2 Top 8% | #14 Bottom 48% | #3 Top 12% | #9 Top 34% |
Who should buy
Do not miss out on the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market if you demand the following features from your tennis footwear:
- Sliding felt smooth as well
- Midsole width - forefoot
Who should NOT buy
Considering how much engineering has been put into the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market, we expected it to perform much better in our durability tests. If you want a more hard-wearing tennis shoe with similar characteristics, the ASICS Solution Speed FF 3 Midsole width - forefoot.
And if you are ready to sacrifice a couple of ounces in return for added cushioning and durability, your alternatives will also include the And keep in mind that its flex grooves are part of the shoes flexibility system as well and the Highly flexible forefoot. Both are speed-oriented shoes as well.
Cushioning
Heel stack
On foot, this Babolat shoe feels pretty consistent with the other speed-oriented models. Its moderate heel stack of 28.3 mm creates a rather grounded underfoot experience.
But if you're coming from the more cushioned options like the Babolat tennis shoes or the Feels well-connected to the court, you will notice the difference in impact protection for sure. Our feet felt a little more beat up at the end of the playtesting session.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 28.3 mm |
Average | 29.3 mm |
Forefoot stack
Expectedly, the forefoot stack of the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market is also on the lower side. Our calliper returned only 18.2 mm of stack height in this area.
We believe that players who prefer more intimate contact with the court will appreciate this setup.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 18.2 mm |
Average | 19.6 mm |
Drop
According to Babolat's official specs, the heel-to-toe drop of the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market comes in at 10.1 mm. And this is precisely the same as the measurement we got!
This is a typical offset for tennis shoes in which the heel is moderately raised above the toes to provide shock absorption in the rearfoot while keeping the forefoot flexible and grounded for control.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 10.1 mm |
Average | 9.7 mm |
Midsole softness
As a whole, the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market feels moderately soft but it gets a bit softer in the heel.
Having sliced the shoe in half, we found two types of foam inside - the firmer white one and the softer red one. The primary white foam takes up almost the entire length of the midsole and is responsible for making the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market feel so grounded and connected. It proved to be on the firm side showing 29.6 HA on our Shore A durometer.
But compared to other tennis shoes we've tested, it is actually on par with the industry average. You cannot have a plush tennis shoe and feel stable on the court, right?
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 29.6 HA |
Average | 28.4 HA |
Secondary foam softness
Even as a lightweight shoe, the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market didn't skimp on the in-shoe comfort and padding.
Its collar and tongue pack enough foam to buffer the ankle and instep respectively from the pressure and friction of aggressive court movements.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 26.5 HA |
Average | 26.2 HA |
Insole thickness
The Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market treated us to a pretty comfortable step-in feel thanks to the 4.5 mm thick OrthoLite insole.
ASICS Solution Speed FF 3.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 4.5 mm |
Average | 5.2 mm |
Size and fit
Size
We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.
A series of disappointments continue with the frail inner lining of the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market
The Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market offered a very snug one-to-one fit to our medium-width male feet in our regular men's US size 9.
Using a calliper, we measured the widest part of the shoe's toebox at 98.2 mm which is a few millimetres narrower than average. We believe that the rubber overlays also play their part in making the shoe's fit a bit tighter.
But wide feet still have a chance with this Babolat shoe as it is also available in a wide variant.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 98.2 mm |
Average | 101.0 mm |
Toebox width - big toe
Please keep in mind that the shoe's toebox does taper towards the front as well.
Our calliper returned a slightly narrower-than-average reading of 74.8 mm.

Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 74.8 mm |
Average | 76.9 mm |
Laces
Two of the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market's eyelets are integrated into the shoe's rubber toe guard. It helps to keep the fit tight and secure as you slide in and out of the shots.
The laces themselves are pretty basic - flat and thin they get the job done but, frankly, we are concerned about their longevity. They look frail compared to the laces we normally see in tennis shoes.
Stability
It was also reassuring to discover that the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market packs the typical 4 mm of rubber thickness in its outsole.
But considering its hardness and reaction to abrasive surfaces, we can't guarantee that this rubber would outlive the average tennis shoe outsole.
Lateral stability test
We believe that one of the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market's biggest strengths is its ability to hold the foot firmly and securely as we take off for a shot or perform extreme lateral movements.
Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit.
Torsional rigidity
A stiff TPU shank in the midfoot adds a good amount of rigidity to the shoe's construction making it much harder to twist.
Both sides semi.
Sliding felt smooth as well.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 4 |
Average | 4.3 |
Asics Solution Speed FF 3
Looks like we've got a rival to the famous ASICS heel clutch! The rearfoot hold of the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market is truly unparalleled!
Our heels and ankles felt cemented by the shoe's mighty heel counter which scored maximum on our stiffness test. There was not a whiff of undue foot movement inside the shoe and heel slips were out of question too.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 5 |
Average | 3.9 |
is the best alternative
The Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market also packs a reliable forefoot flange which is essential for maintaining stability for lateral movements.
Measuring its width between the most extended contact points, our calliper showed 113.8 mm. That's even a couple of millimetres wider than average!
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 113.8 mm |
Average | 111.9 mm |
hard court tennis shoes
The heel of this Babolat shoe also provides a pretty large landing area which contributes to stability.
Our calliper showed a solid reading of 90.0 mm in the widest part which is exactly the same as the average of tennis shoes.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 90.0 mm |
Average | 89.5 mm |
Mizuno Enforce Tour
Another standout feature of the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market is its exceptional flexibility. Not only did the shoe bend effortlessly with our feet during the playtest but it also proved to be the most flexible tennis shoe in our lab!
According to our force gauge, it took only 18.8N to bend the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market to a 90-degree angle. That's about 60% less than it takes an average tennis shoe!
Active Flexion is the name of the game. These grid-like flex grooves in the forefoot, paired with the flexible Matryx upper, managed to achieve an impressive level of flexibility. The identical flex grooves are even present on the shoe's insole.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 18.8N |
Average | 31.3N |
Weight
Trying the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market for the first time, we instantly felt that speed was the shoe's number one priority.
Tipping the scale at only 11.0 oz (312g), this tennis shoe made it to the top three lightest court shoes we've tested (along with the ASICS Solution Speed FF 3 at 10.9 oz).
It may lack the cushioning and sturdy stabilising component of other tennis shoes, but the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market is unmatched when it comes to effortless acceleration.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 11.01 oz (312g) |
Average | 12.84 oz (364g) |
Breathability
The Matryx upper on the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market didn't look like a highly breathable fabric at first but we are glad that our lab tests proved that wrong.
As the smoke started to fill up the shoe's upper, it very quickly found its way out - a great indicator of ventilation capacity.
Hovering the shoe's half-cut upper over the light, we also found that it is a rather transparent fabric and there were no major obstructions to the airflow either.
Examining the Matryx under the microscope left us puzzled - how does such a densely woven fabric get to be so breathable? We couldn't even see the pores in between the threads! So it must be the soft and light nature of the weave that makes this material so airy.
Anyway, this doesn't change the fact that the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market is better-aerated than the average tennis shoe. We happily rated its breathability with a high score of 4 out of 5 thereby approving it for hot summer sessions.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 4 |
Average | 3.4 |
Durability
Toe guard durability
As a speed-oriented tennis shoe, we expected the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market to be ready for some aggressive toe drags. But its medial toe protection just didn't look quite reassuring. Visually, it even looked less promising compared to the shoe's main rival, the ASICS Solution Speed FF 3:
Drilling the primary toe-drag area of the shoe's overlay confirmed our worries - the sandpaper left a pretty deep dent in the rubber.
Even though it offers a decent amount of protection, we don't think its longevity is on par with the Tongue: gusset type we've tested. On a 1-5 durability scale, we couldn't give it any higher than 2.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 2 |
Average | 2.6 |
Toebox durability
We found that the Matryx fabric lived up to its breathability promise but how about the "extraordinarily durable and abrasion resistant" claim? Our expectations were set high by the fact that the Matryx was made in part with Kevlar, a high-strength material that's even used in bulletproof vests!
To our regret, the fabric's durability performance in our 12-second Dremel test was only decent. The material got notably scuffed by the sandpaper and showed more wear than the average tennis shoe in our lab.
Even though it was not a see-through hole, the tool still burned through the topmost layer of the Matryx. That's why we had to lower the toebox durability score of this Babolat shoe to 3 out of 5.
Gladly, the fabric is guarded by thick rubber overlays in all of the high-contact areas. But if you happen to brush the Matryx parts against the court, we don't expect those to last very long.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 3 |
Average | 3.8 |
Asics Solution Speed FF 3
A series of disappointments continue with the frail inner lining of the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market.
Only 4 seconds of sandpaper exposure were enough to tear this thin mesh completely. That was enough to lower the heel padding durability score to only 1 out of 5.

Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 1 |
Average | 3.1 |
Outsole hardness
But what about the shoe's renowned Michelin rubber outsole? Will it return any better results? We measured its hardness, wear resistance, and thickness to find out.
The hardness looks good showing 83.4 HC on our Shore C durometer. While it's not in the hardest range (88-92 HC), it is enough to promise solid resistance to abrasion.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 82.4 HC |
Average | 86.1 HC |
Outsole durability
As we drilled the shoe's Michelin rubber for 22 seconds at a high Dremel speed of 10K RPM, we saw that the material put up a good fight.
Our tread gauge measured the depth of the dent at 1.1 mm which is not impressive but good enough to promise average tennis shoe longevity.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 1.1 mm |
Average | 0.8 mm |
Outsole thickness
It was also reassuring to discover that the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market packs the typical 4 mm of rubber thickness in its outsole.
But considering its hardness and reaction to abrasive surfaces, we can't guarantee that this rubber would outlive the average tennis shoe outsole.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 4.0 mm |
Average | 4.2 mm |
Misc
Grip / Traction
If it wasn't for the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market's mighty grip, all that lightness and stability would go to waste. We are happy to report that this Babolat tennis shoe knows what it takes to bite onto the court like there is no tomorrow.
It's not a traditional herringbone tread pattern but we found it to be very effective on the playtest.
Sliding felt smooth as well.
Price
Cutting-edge Matryx upper, world-class Michelin rubber, several proprietary technologies designed exclusively for the Babolat Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market... Based on credentials alone, the shoe's current price point sounds quite reasonable. Especially if we were assessing this shoe as an isolated unit.
Both sides semi ASICS Solution Speed FF 3, for example, is slightly cheaper but ticks the same boxes as the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market, weighs equally light, and promises better longevity.
Similar speed-oriented tennis shoes like the And keep in mind that its flex grooves are part of the shoes flexibility system as well and the Mizuno Exceed Tour 6 also have a slightly lower retail price but they trade lightness for better durability.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | $150 |
Tongue padding
Even as a lightweight shoe, the Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market didn't skimp on the in-shoe comfort and padding.
Its collar and tongue pack enough foam to buffer the ankle and instep respectively from the pressure and friction of aggressive court movements.

Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | 9.2 mm |
Average | 7.7 mm |
hard court tennis shoes
You can also expect a highly secure lockdown thanks to the shoe's semi-gusseted tongue. It doesn't slide during the movement and prevents the foot from doing so as well.

Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | Both sides (semi) |
Heel tab
There is no heel tab on this Babolat shoe but on-and-off was never an issue.

Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | None |
Removable insole
There is an option to remove the shoe's insole but we don't think it would be necessary (or recommended) because of how comfortable it is in the first place.
And keep in mind that its flex grooves are part of the shoe's flexibility system as well.
Its ergonomic shape feels superior to the flat inserts in most tennis shoes on the market | Yes |