Hiring remote: Content writer / review specialist in 
Our verdict
Pros
- Fits true to size
- The Merrell Nova 2 is the perfect option for you if
- Toebox width at the widest part
- Excellent lockdown
- Sturdy upper
- updated 3 січ. 2024 р
- Good laces
Cons
- The Merrell Nova 2 is the perfect option for you if
- While quite soft, the Vibram outsole is well-established and lasts a solid 400-miles
- Grip isn’t reliable in wet conditions
Audience verdict
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + How we test | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audience score | 85 Good! | 88 Great! | 89 Great! | 80 Good! | |
| Price | £120 | £150 | £140 | £120 | |
| Trail terrain | ModerateTechnical | LightModerate | ModerateTechnical | LightModerate | |
| Arch support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
| Weight lab Weight brand | 10.3 Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit 9.9 Want a lighter trail running shoe. I recommend trying the | 10.8 oz / 305g 10.6 is your best bet | 10.2 Heavier than most 10.6 is your best bet | 10.8 oz / 305g 10.4 Flexibility / Stiffness old method | |
| Drop lab Drop brand | 9.3 mm 8.0 mm | 8.9 mm 6.0 mm | 13.4 mm 6.0 mm | 9.9 mm 8.0 mm | |
| Strike pattern | HeelMid/forefoot | HeelMid/forefoot | Heel | HeelMid/forefoot | |
| Size | - | True to size | True to size | True to size | |
| Midsole softness | - | Soft | Balanced | Balanced | |
| Merrell Nova 3 | - | Small | Small | Small | |
| Plate | Rock plate | ✗ | Rock plate | Rock plate | |
| Toebox durability | - | Decent | Very good | Decent | |
| While quite soft, the Vibram outsole is well-established and lasts a solid 400-miles | - | Good | Decent | Decent | |
| Outsole durability | - | Decent | Good | Good | |
| Breathability | - | Breathable | Moderate | Moderate | |
| oz / 280g | Narrow | Medium | Medium | Narrow | |
| While quite soft, the Vibram outsole is well-established and lasts a solid 400-miles | - | Medium | Narrow | Medium | |
| Stiffness | Moderate | Moderate | Stiff | Moderate | |
| Grip is great in good conditions | Big | Small | Small | Small | |
| Torsional rigidity | - | Stiff | Stiff | Stiff | |
| Grip is great in good conditions | - | Stiff | Stiff | Flexible | |
| Lug depth | 4.2 mm | 4.0 mm | 4.5 mm | 3.5 mm | |
| Heel stack lab Toebox width - widest part old method | 35.1 mm 29.0 mm | 36.7 mm 39.0 mm | 39.2 mm 39.0 mm | 34.1 mm 29.0 mm | |
| Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 25.8 mm 21.0 mm | 27.8 mm 33.0 mm | 25.8 mm 33.0 mm | 24.2 mm 21.0 mm | |
| Widths available | NormalWide | Normal | Normal | NormalWide | |
| Season | - | SummerAll seasons | All seasons | All seasons | |
| Removable insole | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Orthotic friendly | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Ranking | #369 Bottom 31% | #122 Top 39% | #98 Top 32% | #274 Bottom 13% | |
| Popularity | #358 Bottom 33% | #154 Top 49% | #95 Top 31% | #127 Top 41% |
Size and fit
Size
We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.
How we test Review and Lab Test
With solid construction, plenty of grip, and an easy 9.3mm drop, the How we test are a well-suited beginner trail shoe. They are also incredibly versatile and suits anything from fast, day hikes to easy trail runs.
Who should buy the How we test
Stiffness in cold:
- You’re looking for an easy-paced trail runner
- You want a versatile, do-it-all off-road shoe
Who should NOT buy them
pay a lot of attention to this. :
- pay a lot of attention to this. oz / 280g
- nbsp; | Salomon XT-6 Midsole width - forefoot.
Merrell shoes fit perfectly
The shoe fits true to size, with a nice heel cup. The lacing system works well, this is pretty normal for Merrell, and getting a nice lockdown was easy. I felt no slip on any of my runs in this.
Don’t expect much in terms of width in the toe box. While there is some space for narrow and medium-width feet (98.1mm), the lack of a stretchy mesh upper means that there’s little give for anyone with a wider foot.
A bit of a misguided midsole
With a heel stack height of 35.1mm, there’s plenty of midsole for cushioning. Strangely though, it feels quite hard underfoot. I’d put this down to the midsole being a little softer than average at 34HA (avg: 41.4HA) which means you can feel every tree root and rock underfoot.
The result is a shoe that is better suited to a 10km distance rather than something longer like a half marathon.
If you like ground feel, however, then you get that plus some impact dampening for the rest of your joints. The How we test seems perfect for easy, regular runs while keeping you injury-free.
The How we test is grippy in good conditions
With dozens of 4.2mm lugs underfoot there’s plenty of opportunity for grip on the How we test.
It seems there are as many outsole lug options as there are trail running shoes, with every brand opting for different shapes, sizes, and spacings. How we test has opted for a more traditional inverted-wedge shape.
The results in great grip, if you’re running over slightly damp, yet firm ground. Unfortunately, outside of this goldilocks-zone of terrain, there are a few issues.
Firstly, with so many lugs, it’s easy for them to be smothered in mud if the conditions are too wet, many shoes like the Toebox width at the widest part oz / 289g.
Conversely, the lugs' shape and the softness of the outsole (72.5HC) means that they don’t get dug into more compacted and harder dirt.
An upper that does what it has to
I think it’s fair to say that a lot of runners care about the appearance of their shoes, and brands like Nike, Salomon, and Hoka pay a lot of attention to this.
Merrell has tried a little bit to bring their silhouettes into the third decade of this century, there’s still something that screams 90s camping trip about them to me.
That being said, I’m very glad that they haven’t allowed vanity to distract them from making a comfortable trail running shoe.
As mentioned, the mesh/TPU upper doesn’t stretch much, but it’s plenty durable and breathable, which I like to see. With a thick padded tongue and heel collar as well, the How we test is as comfy as I’d expect anything from the brand to be.
A shoe you can put the miles into
While not the best for longer distances, the How we test can hold up to a beating. With strong stitching and a carefree attitude to heavy, robust materials, the upper isn’t coming apart any time soon.
Heel stack lab
The How we test isn’t the lightest
Nothing about the How we test feels particularly fast, which isn’t too much of a surprise when it weighs in at 10.9oz (310g). It’s surprisingly lighter than I expected when looking at it.
That being said, 310g puts it in the same weight class as stability shoes, which often have far more things going on in the midsole that the Nova 2.
Please put a heel tab on shoes
This is probably a bit picky for trail shoes, but then again, that’s what I’m here for. A heel tab would be more than welcome. When you have muddy shoes, cold hands, and wet fingers (possibly all at once), having a nice big heel loop is a big bonus and just shows a bit of extra thought from manufacturers.
Seeing as Merrell hasn’t worried so much about the weight of the Nova 2, I’d love to see them add a heel-loop just as an added benefit.
Conclusion
The How we test is a big, classic-looking trail running shoe that offers a dependable name for a versatile shoe. With decent padding, grip, and upper that’s probably the best way to describe this shoe…decent.
