Our verdict

The New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm delivers a unique running experience with its ultra-rockered sole and plush foam. We found the premium upper and unfiltered ground feel exceptional during our runs, making it a standout for easy and recovery miles. However, in our lab tests, the minimal rubber coverage and lack of a full-PEBA midsole left us questioning its high price tag.

New Balance 2002r Truffle Pros

  • Plush, cloud-like cushioning
  • New Balance 991 Marathon Running Shoes Sneakers M991ANG
  • Lightweight for its size
  • Breathable, moisture-wicking upper
  • Excellent ground feedback from EVA outsole
  • New Balance Precision Running Jacket Ladies
  • A BATHING APE × New Balance 2002R Gray 23.5cm
  • Fantastic knit tongue
  • Ténis New Balance Fresh Foam Hierro v7 verde preto júnior
  • 360-degree reflectivity

New Balance 2002r Truffle Cons

  • Low-volume toebox
  • Price feels a bit excessive
  • Not enough energy return
  • EVA outsole raises durability concerns

Audience verdict

90
Great!

Who should buy

Having tested the New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm both in the lab and on runs, we found it's:

  • New Balance Hoops Essentials Fundamental Hoody.
  • Perfect for midfoot strikers who value a cushioned-yet-lightweight ride for easy runs or long distances.
  • New Balance 530 MRL530SE.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm

Who should NOT buy

The biggest downside of the Balos is its steep price, which places it at the upper end of premium daily trainers. In our view, the performance doesn’t entirely justify the cost. For runners seeking a more reasonable price/performance ratio, we recommend the New Balance Zapatillas Running Fresh Foam Arishi V2 Vibrant Sky or the New Balance 680 V7 2e Wide Nb Grey White Men Running Sport.

We VERSION2 believe the energy return from the Fresh Foam X midsole falls short for a shoe at this price point. If superior bounce is what you’re after, the New balance gw500ngn offers a lighter build, more cushioning, and a state-of-the-art midsole.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

One of the best ways to describe the Balos is “cushioned”—it offers not only a plush running experience but VERSION2 boasts a 37.8 mm heel height, just shy of the 40-mm threshold.

We think that this measurement strikes an excellent balance for this shoe. Anything more would have significantly compromised stability, and despite the ultra-soft foam, it’s remarkably difficult to bottom out at easy or moderate paces—the ones best suited for this model.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Heel stack
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 37.8 mm
Average 34.1 mm
Compared to 389 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

With 31.9 mm in the forefoot, the Balos provides generous cushioning for forefoot strikers, making it particularly effective for long runs where enhanced muscle protection and sustained comfort are essential.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Forefoot stack
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 31.9 mm
Average 25.5 mm
Compared to 389 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

New Balance lists an official drop of 6.0 mm for the Balos, and our measurement came in at 5.9 mm—a nearly spot-on result that's ideal for midfoot strikers.

In our view, this speaks volumes about New Balance, especially compared to brands like Hoka, whose Mach X 2 features an advertised drop nearly double its real figure.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Drop
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 5.9 mm
Average 8.5 mm
Compared to 389 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The midsole of the Balos is quite interesting. Although it advertises Fresh Foam X, it uses a unique compound that differ from models like the EVA-only 1080 v14 or Evoz v3. New Balance has blended 20% PEBA with 80% EVA, adding a touch of energy return that, frankly, is much-needed for a shoe at this price point.

That said, we believe 20% PEBA is still underwhelming for a shoe costing so much. Competitors like the Officielt udstyr New Balance and New Balance 2002r Truffle feature full-PEBA midsoles at lower prices. However, knowing New Balance, we’ve tempered our expectations regarding energy return even before unboxing the shoe.

That's why we believe that the standout feature of the Balos isn’t its bounce but its cloud-like softness. Measuring 11.6 HA on our durometer, it delivers undeniable plushness, ideal for runners who love a marshmallowy sensation underfoot.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Midsole softness
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 11.6 HA
Average 20.9 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 316 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
38.9 HA

New Balance Sweatpants Grey (%)

The added PEBA enhanced the midsole’s performance in cold conditions, showing only a 24% firmness increase after 20 minutes in our freezer. Therefore, it remains impressively plush—even during frosty winter runs.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm New Balance Sweatpants Grey (%)
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 24%
Average 25%
Compared to 316 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
New Balance Sweatpants Grey
63%

Insole thickness

We found a basic 4.7-mm insole with no perforations for added airflow. Honestly, for the premium price of this shoe, a premium insole would have been a welcome addition.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Insole thickness lab
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 4.7 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 385 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

New Balance 2002r Truffle | Rocker

The New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm is one of the most rockered shoes we’ve tested in the lab, and we think there’s no need for ultra-precise measurements to notice it. Simply looking at its sharply curved profile makes this clear.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm side

But of course, we measured it anyway. We discovered that while the toe spring doesn’t rise exceptionally high, it begins quite early, and the heel features a deeply curved design. This results in a ride better suited for those who appreciate a forward-driving feel, ideal for aerobic paces and long-distance runs, but not for high-speed intervals.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Rocker

Size and fit

Size

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm is true to size (26 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 363 running shoes
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Футболка спортивна компресійна new balance

To assess the fit of the Balos, we crafted a gel mould with our custom method for precise comparison against other models. This allowed us to gather detailed measurements of the toebox.

After testing, we discovered the widest part of the upper measured 95.3 mm. That's around the average for Балони new balance, and it aligns with New Balance’s consistent approach of designing moderately-spacious toeboxes for their daily trainers.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Футболка спортивна компресійна new balance
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 95.3 mm
Average 95.6 mm
Compared to 135 running shoes
Number of shoes
90.9 mm
Футболка спортивна компресійна new balance
101.1 mm

New Balance 997HV1 All Terrain Trampki

New Balance 2002r Truffle.

While it should suit most feet, a bit more space for toe splay would have been ideal in the standard width D. Thankfully, New Balance provides a Wide size option in select markets.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm New Balance 997HV1 All Terrain Trampki
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 72.8 mm
Average 73.5 mm
Compared to 135 running shoes
Number of shoes
67.9 mm
New Balance 997HV1 All Terrain Trampki
82.4 mm

New Balance 2002r Truffle | Toebox height

Кросівки new balance arish 41 розмір.

At 24.5 mm, we found it to be a low-volume shoe, so runners with higher-volume feet should approach with caution.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Toebox height
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 24.5 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 134 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
32.5 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

New Balance made considerable efforts to offset the plush foam of the Balos with clever design tweaks to enhance stability, and in our view, it ended in a draw.

It’s not wildly unstable like the OG Nike Invincible, but we think its low-to-medium stability feel is best suited for neutral runners.

Torsional rigidity

New Balance has focused on increasing the torsional rigidity of the Balos to a solid 4/5, which is impressively high for a plateless running shoe. This adjustment helps maintain a centred ride but naturally detracts from a more flexible, natural running experience.

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 368 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter is slightly stiffer than what’s found in most daily trainers, scoring again 4/5, which further enhances rearfoot support and adds an another layer of stability to the shoe.

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 4
Average 2.9
Compared to 352 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

brand new with original box New Balance PH327SP

When we flipped the shoe in the lab, we couldn’t help but notice its Hoka-like design, featuring an ultra-wide midfoot and a broad heel. The forefoot, however, is less exaggerated at 117.6 mm—just slightly wider than average.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm brand new with original box New Balance PH327SP
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 117.6 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 390 running shoes
Number of shoes
103.3 mm
brand new with original box New Balance PH327SP
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

And here’s the heel—measuring 99.7 mm wide, this design leans toward a stability shoe. It’s a logical choice to balance the plush foam and nearly 40 mm stack height in this area, but makes the shoe look and feel a bit clumsy too.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Midsole width - heel
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 99.7 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 390 running shoes
Number of shoes
73.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

zapatillas de running New Balance mujer talla 41.5

While torsionally rigid, the Balos showcases impressive longitudinal flexibility, requiring only 17.3N in our 90-degree bend test. It’s ideal for easy runs and could even work for walking, though given its price, we believe it’s best reserved for running...

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 17.3N
Average 28.1N
Concepts Launches New Balance 9060 Workwear & Indigo Pack.
Compared to 372 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Weight

At just 8.7 oz or 247g, one of the standout strengths of the Balos is its impressively low weight for such a generously cushioned shoe.

This lightweight-yet-cushioned build aligns perfectly with what we expect from a premium-priced running shoe. In our view, New Balance delivered with the Balos an excellent choice for runners seeking a plush yet feather-light daily trainer.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Weight
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 8.71 oz (247g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 390 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

If a shoe costs £200, breathability is a non-negotiable feature—especially for a daily trainer intended for year-round use. Thankfully, the Balos met our expectations when we tested it in the lab.

Using our smoke-pumping machine, we observed smoke escaping efficiently through the toebox, earning the shoe a solid 4/5 for breathability. This is a great result for runners tackling warmer conditions.

We then examined the upper under a light and noted its smartly designed ventilation zones. The toebox features an ultra-thin, airy material for excellent airflow, while the midfoot has moderate coverage, and the structured heel prioritises support over ventilation—a decision that makes sense.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm microscope

To further analyse the upper, we used a microscope and were impressed by the precision in its construction.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm microscope

New Balance interlaced threads of varying thickness to optimise durability while maintaining breathability.

The overall design combines the plush heel area of a daily trainer with the thin, lightweight toebox of a tempo shoe, making it a great blend of comfort and performance.

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 4
Average 3.8
Compared to 319 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

We suspected that the ultra-thin toebox of the Balos would struggle in our durability test—and unfortunately, we were right. After testing it with the Dremel, the material gave out entirely, earning a disappointing 1 out of 5.

As we lifted the Dremel, the damage revealed itself completely. That white layer visible in the images isn’t part of the shoe’s structure—it’s a temporary insert we used to hold the upper securely in place. However, the final result left no doubt!

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 1
Average 2.5
Compared to 253 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Ténis New Balance 574 v2 azul marinho branco castanho

Moving to the heel, the Balos redeemed itself with an impressive 4/5, alleviating concerns about durability. We were genuinely pleased with this result, ensuring no early wear issues in this notoriously high-friction area.

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 4
Average 3.2
Compared to 249 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Ténis New Balance 574 v2 azul marinho branco castanho
5

Outsole hardness

We’ve praised the Balos for its lightweight build despite its size, and the main reason lies in the outsole. It features minimal rubber coverage, applied only in high-wear areas—specifically, the toe spring zone and the lateral side of the heel. That’s all.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm outsole design

In these key sections, the Balos utilises thick rubber, which scored 81.0 HC on our durometer, an average measurement. For the rest of the outsole, New Balance employed a combination of white exposed foam and blue rubberized EVA, which we’ll detail further in a moment.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Outsole hardness
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 81.0 HC
Average 79.9 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 370 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.3 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

Before diving into the rubberized EVA, we fired up the Dremel to test the rubber’s performance under stress. The results were impressive: just 0.5 mm of wear. That offers some reassurance despite the limited rubber coverage.

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 0.5 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 231 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Another strong aspect of the rubber design is its substantial thickness, measuring 4.5 mm.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Outsole thickness
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 4.5 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 389 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Rubberized outsole durability

New Balance incorporated a rare technique in the Balos, replacing standard rubber with rubberized EVA on the outsole. This adjustment makes the shoe lighter and enhances the ultra-soft feel during runs by minimising the amount of hard rubber.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm rubberized EVA durometer

It’s not a groundbreaking innovation though—New Balance used a similar approach in the Beacon v1 many years ago, and ASICS adopted it more recently in the Cumulus 26. Сумка new balance canvas 2ways tote.

As anticipated, the Dremel quickly tore through the blue EVA erasing more than 6 mm of foam, confirming that runners who tend to wear out the medial side of their outsoles should carefully reconsider the Balos as an option.

Misc

Price

The New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm is undeniably pricey—there’s no sugarcoating it, and we’re certainly not here to act as New Balance sales reps. We even shelled out the £200 ourselves to buy this pair!

That said, if you’re willing to invest a bit more in a daily trainer, this shoe delivers premium materials, an ultra-lightweight build, and a unique, fun running experience that’s hard to find in its category.

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm $200
Compared to 390 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£270

Reflective elements

For £200, we expect any daily trainer to pack every premium feature imaginable. One such feature is reflective elements—not essential, but they provide an extra layer of safety for low-light runs.

We were thrilled to discover full 360-degree reflectivity, a rare feature that adds value to the shoe—though we still question whether the price might be too high...

Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Yes

Tongue padding

In our view, delivering substantial cushioning with minimal weight requires trade-offs, and the tongue padding is one of them—measuring just 2.5 mm, it’s noticeably thinner than most premium daily trainers.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm tongue
Flat laces paired with punched eyelets—the most reliable duo.

Interestingly, this knit tongue lacks a loop to keep it centred, which could pose a problem if it isn’t gusseted. Let’s take a look...

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Tongue padding
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm 2.5 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 387 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Оригінальні бігові кросівки new balance

Yes, it’s fully fixed to the sides, and we must say it offers one of the better fits we’ve encountered recently. The knit material of the tongue molds beautifully to the instep, enhancing comfort and providing a secure lockdown.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Оригінальні бігові кросівки new balance
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Both sides (full)

Heel tab

We found an extended heel collar designed for easy grip and Achilles tendon support.

While it includes the shoe’s name printed on it, we believe New Balance could improve the overall aesthetic of the lettering. It looks kinda cheap.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Heel tab
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm New Balance FuelCell Echo MFCECCV

Removable insole

The removable insole comes with a standard shape, making it easy to swap for orthotics or a thinner option to slightly increase the toebox volume.

New Balance New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Removable insole
Test results
New Balance ML2002RA Gray 24.5cm Yes