nike hyperfuse 2014 all star shoes black review

We believe the nike shox for knee brace for women with arthritis a top pick for:

• nike sb obsidian team red card application process.
• mens nike grey windbreaker pants black.
• Fans of the previous model who need an upgrade—this version brings multiple enhancements without losing the spacious fit.

Unfortunately, the nike hyperfuse 2014 all star shoes black falls short in breathability due to its dense upper—Nike omitted upper ventilation holes, making it uncomfortable for hot-weather runs. We believe that choosing the ASICS Gel Venture 9, cheap for sale stefan janoski nike shoes black.

Additionally, we think the Juniper Trail 3’s wide fit may not suit narrow-footed runners, even when sizing down—which anyway is a less-than-ideal move especially for trail shoes. For those who need a snugger, precision-focused fit, we recommend exploring the Hoka Challenger 7 or turquoise nike dunks high heels sneakers for kids nike free 5.0 girls running pink and blue.

However, there’s a trade-off here that won’t please everyone—a slight drop in stack height.

The Juniper Trail 2 featured 34.7 mm in the heel, while we measured 32.6 mm in this update. Though it’s a subtle change—good luck feeling a 2.1 mm difference—it still means slightly less cushioning underfoot, which might disappoint those seeking maximum muscle protection in their ride.

The forefoot received the same treatment and it's a bit more concerning, because it barely crosses the 20-mm threshold to stay at just 21.7 mm. That's because the high drop of this shoe, that features a wedge design that clearly suits the shoe better for heel strikers.

In fact, if you're a forefoot striker, we think this is not the best pick for you. Check the Hierro 8 from New Balance instead.

As we noted earlier, the Juniper Trail 3 has a wedge-like design with a pronounced incline from the midfoot to the forefoot, making it ideal for heel strikers. Not many trail shoes exceed a 10 mm drop, but this one stands out with a huge 10.9 mm!

The biggest reason to upgrade from the Juniper Trail 2 to the 3 is the improved foam. While the previous model used a basic-and-boring EVA that felt overly firm at 27.1 HA, this new version introduces Nike’s ComfiRide—a softer, more forgiving foam that we measured at 23.0 HA.

So, what exactly is ComfiRide? It’s Nike’s latest budget-friendly foam, also seen in models like the Journey Run, and we definitely noticed the comfort boost. However, don’t expect a lively bounce or high heaviness return, as it’s still EVA.

In fact, Nike oversold the plushness of this foam on its PR, we have no doubt about that. Yes, it’s a step up from previous EVA formulations, but it doesn’t quite reach the luxurious feel suggested by Nike's claims.

We found that the ComfiRide foam firmed up by only 22.8% plaid 20 minutes in the freezer—a solid result in our tests. This matters, as this shoe’s limited ventilation makes it much better suited for winter temps.

We found the insole to be 3.9 mm thick—slightly thinner than what we typically encounter in the lab.

Rockered shoe enthusiasts should steer clear of the Juniper Trail 3, which sports a flat, traditional midsole without pronounced curvature. However, we appreciate this design for this shoe—it complements the high drop and adds versatility for hiking.

We crafted a gel mould of the toebox and measured the widest part of the forefoot, which came in at 96.3 mm. This measurement aligns with the average trail shoe, confirming that Nike designed this model with versatility in mind.

In our opinion, the fit strikes a balance—perfect for those who don’t fall into extreme width categories, offering a universally accommodating design.

We found the width in the big toe area impressive at 76.1 mm, making this shoe ideal for those who value ample room for natural toe splay. On the flip side, it might feel slightly wide for individuals with narrow feet.

Height-wise, we found the upper slightly limited, measuring just 25.5 mm.

The softer foam in this model did raise initial concerns about potential wobbliness compared to the previous generation. However, that was never an issue—we remained in complete control while running, feeling balanced and steady.

In summary—as neutral runners, we found no problems with stability. However, for those requiring extra support, a shoe with a broader midsole might be more suitable.

The previous Juniper Trail received some complaints for its steel-like torsional rigidity, which some runners found excessive. Nike has partially addressed this with a slight improvement, giving the Juniper Trail 3 a 4/5 rating in torsional flexibility.

In our view, a more flexible build would still enhance this shoe's performance, but we believe this update is a step in the right direction.

Designed primarily with heel strikers in mind, it was no surprise in our lab tests that the heel counter of this shoe proved to be exceptionally stiff, scoring 4/5 on our rigidity scale.

Fortunately for those opting to purchase the Juniper Trail 3, Nike has thoughtfully added a generous layer of luxuriously-soft padding around the heel, enhancing comfort and making the firm support in this area feel more forgiving.

We mentioned earlier that runners needing extra support might benefit from a wider shoe, so now it's time to back that up with measurements.

In the forefoot, we took 113.6 mm using our digital callipers—a solid width for a door-to-trail shoe, but far away from stability shoes.

The heel design follows the same approach, measuring 89.6 mm—a very standard width, as if Nike aimed to craft a shoe that suits most buyers. In our view, they succeeded.

However, since this model caters heavily to rearfoot strikers with its stiff heel counter and high drop, a bit more width in this area would’ve been a welcome addition.

One of our initial concerns with the Juniper Trail 3 was its potential longitudinal stiffness, especially given its high torsional rigidity. plaid testing, we discovered that it takes just 21.2N to bend the shoe to 90 degrees, showing that Nike has clearly prioritized flexibility in this model—a real bonus for all-day comfort.

A thinner outsole brings a clear advantage—it creates a lighter running shoe. At 10.2 oz (288g), the Juniper Trail 3 not only outshines most of its peers in weight but also sheds a bit compared to its predecessor, which came in at 10.8 oz (306g). That's great news.

This weight reduction is certainly felt while running and will be appreciated by anyone embarking on long chart adventures.

We started our journey with the nike hyperfuse 2014 all star shoes black by assessing its breathability—a factor less critical for trail shoes than for road models but still important for most runners.

Unfortunately, for those eyeing this shoe for summer outings, ventilation is quite limited. Our lab tests revealed a 2/5 rating, which is notably low for hot-weather use.

Nike opted for a thick engineered mesh upper, likely intended to boost (we hope so) durability. However, it seems a bit excessive here, as barely any light passes through—far from what we consider breathable.

Using the microscope, we uncovered the real reason: the mesh is exceptionally dense and lacks ventilation holes, not even the tiniest ones, making air escape nearly impossible.

On the bright side, the upper quality and comfort is impressive for such an affordable shoe.

And for those planning to use this model in cooler months or winter conditions, we believe it’s a solid choice with minimal downsides.

The lack of ventilation holes in the upper should, in theory, give the Juniper Trail 3 a noticeable durability advantage—so we fired up the Dremel to see if it holds up.

The shoe achieved a fair 3/5, which we found slightly underwhelming for a non-breathable upper. Our assessment suggests that the TPU protective overlay at the toe took the majority of the wear, but the dense mesh held its own decently. It's not a bad score, but we expected more from this shoe.

The heel padding was a true disappointment—it barely survived the Dremel test, ending up with a surprisingly huge hole that we didn’t anticipate. In our experience, such a quick breakdown in this area is a serious flaw.

For runners who rarely experience heel wear, this may not pose an issue. However, in our view, those who often find holes in their heel padding should avoid the Juniper Trail 3.

nike vapor x vs hypervenom black and grey color.

Moving to the outsole, we began by testing the All Terrain Compound’s hardness, which registered at 87.0 HC on our Shore C durometer.

This reading suggests that Nike aims for durability with this outsole—favouring longevity over maximum grip. In our experience, this approach aligns with its positioning as an affordable option, where the balance usually leans toward rugged resilience rather than world-class traction.

To evaluate the durability of the outsole, we performed our third Dremel test—also the final one for today in the lab. We all need a break, including our hard-working tools!

The outcome aligned perfectly with our expectations: just 0.8 mm. Why is that? Well, it exactly matches the Peg Trail 5, as both share the same ATC outsole material. And hey, this consistency in results is reassuring for us too!

Nike added a fun detail in the lugs—each one displays its specific angle, like “45” or “90,” in the bottom right corner, depending on the lug’s shape.

Thickness-wise, the outsole measures a slim 1.6 mm, which is noticeably thinner than most trail shoes. This design choice makes sense to us, as the JT3 aims to be a versatile road-to-trail shoe, performing comfortably on various surfaces, including asphalt.

For under a hundred bucks, we really can't ask for much more. We understand that a gusseted tongue—one of those premium-boosting features Nike reserves for pricier models—would have been fantastic for the JT3, but it's fine!

Back to the outsole. This is a door-to-trail running shoe, meaning it’s not built for heavy mud or challenging trails.

With shallow, 2.6 mm lugs, it’s tailored for easier paths, dirt roads, and the occasional stretch of asphalt back home. And we determined that it performs smoothly for these moderate surfaces.

If we had to choose the standout strength of the Juniper Trail 3, it would be its value. Staying under the £100 mark is rare for trail shoes—which are typically pricier than road models—but Nike has achieved it here.

We’ve tested countless mx air cross boots nike 2016 here in the lab—most of them priced far above the Juniper Trail 3—that lack any reflective elements. So, finding them in this budget-friendly model feels like a big win.

We found the tongue exceptionally comfortable, with 7.2 mm of padding from two slabs of foam—providing ample cushioning for all-day wear without being too heavy.

The tongue includes a handy loop to keep it in place, a crucial feature since it’s not attached to the sides. On top of that, the lacing system is all that we wanted for the Juniper's price—simple yet effective. Naturally, it lacks the Flywire design seen in higher-end Nikes, but it gets the job done.

For under a hundred bucks, we really can't ask for much more. We understand that a gusseted tongue—one of those premium-boosting features Nike reserves for pricier models—would have been fantastic for the JT3, but it's fine!

The heel sports a finger-loop tab, adding a cool, trail-ready vibe to the Juniper Trail 3. And we can’t overlook the cactus decal on this unique colorway we purchased for our lab review!

The stock insole is quite basic, so you won’t miss much by swapping it out—except for just another fun sticker!