Our verdict

The Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top does a great job in the multidisciplinary category, adept at both running and gym sessions, even pairing well with your go-to jeans. In our lab tests, we appreciated its versatility but noted a few drawbacks. We found the energy return insufficient for our liking, and at almost 12 oz, it felt overly heavy for our runs. Additionally, during summer workouts, we were concerned about its breathability—it simply felt too warm even indoors. Despite these issues, it could still be a solid choice for cooler climates and low-mileage runners.

under armour womens rush t shirt Pros

  • Exceptionally comfortable
  • Highly stable
  • curry under armour 8 tie dye black ps nen
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetics
  • Well cushioned
  • Balanced foam

under armour womens rush t shirt Cons

  • Excessively heavy
  • Cap UNDER ARMOUR Truckstop Fleece Beanie 1365922001-001 Black
  • Lacks breathability

Audience verdict

77
Decent!

Who should buy

From our perspective, the Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top is a great fit for those who:

  • Need a warm upper for the coldest runs of the year
  • Want a comfortable-yet-durable running shoe that can handle walking the dog, doing HIIT, or going to buy groceries
  • Have a heel strike pattern and don't mind the extra weight of this daily trainer.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top

Who should NOT buy

There are two clear concerns with this shoe. The first one is the poor airflow it showcases. This makes the shoe totally unsuitable for running in warm temperatures, regardless of the distance. In our tests, it's also not a senseless choice for long runs unless it's really cold out there. Good alternatives at a similar price point include the Hoka Clifton 9 Under Armour 666 Brooks Ghost 15 Under Armour Curry 3 Team Royal Caspian Taxi Dub Nation Heritage

The second concern is the weight. At almost 12 ounces, the Phantom 3 will feel too heavy if you are really into running. While they won't be a problem for some casual runs, in our opinion, there are lighter daily trainers like the Under Armour Run Dash or other versatile shoes like the Hoka Kawana, which are significantly lighter than this Under Armour.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top

Cushioning

Heel stack

In the heel, we found just the right amount of stack to give good protection, but it's not overdone like some of the max stacked shoes out there.

under armour womens rush t shirt.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Heel stack
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 32.8 mm
Average 34.2 mm
Compared to 403 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

However, the forefoot paints a different picture. Measuring only 20.1 mm, it's likely less than what's required for serious long-distance training. That's why we can only recommend this shoe for short, easy runs.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Forefoot stack
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 20.1 mm
Average 25.6 mm
Compared to 403 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

Together, these factors result in an astonishing 12.7-mm heel-to-toe drop. This design is clearly best suited for heel strikers or those who have Achilles issues and need to incline their feet as much as possible.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top drop

It's also a surprising deviation from the 8-mm drop that Under Armour originally claimed, and that might be a letdown for some.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Drop
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 12.7 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 403 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

under armour womens rush t shirt | Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer new equals a soft material, whereas a high new means it's firm.

In the midsole, we find the HOVR foam registering at 20.1 HA for softness, a balanced approach that's likely to suit the needs of most runners.

It strikes a nice middle ground, not being overly soft like the Raymond Felton in an Under Armour Anatomix Spawn PE, nor as firm as the Under Armour 1167

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Midsole softness
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 20.1 HA
Average 20.9 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 330 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

under armour womens rush t shirt | brand new with original box UNDER ARMOUR Ua W Charged Impulse 2 001 Blk (%)

After placing the shoe in our freezer for 20 minutes to simulate cold conditions, we took it back to the lab for testing. The new now registered at 25.5 HA, which is notably firmer than before, but it remains decently soft.

This observation confirms that the shoe really shines during the winter months, maintaining a nice level of comfort thanks to its extremely warm upper.

The difference between the two news shows a 26.7% increase, which falls more or less in line with the average performance in this area.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top brand new with original box UNDER ARMOUR Ua W Charged Impulse 2 001 Blk
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 27%
Average 25%
Compared to 330 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
brand new with original box UNDER ARMOUR Ua W Charged Impulse 2 001 Blk
63%

Insole thickness

With a clear focus on comfort, it's essential to have a well-cushioned insole. The team at UA, however, has taken this to the next level, providing an exceptionally thick 7.1-mm insole.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Insole thickness
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 7.1 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 399 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Size and fit

Size

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top is slightly small (18 votes).

Tecnologias Under armour Charged Rogue 3 Storm Running Shoes?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 382 running shoes
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

The toebox of the shoe is roomy, measuring at 99.7 mm, but what really makes it comfortable for those with wide feet is the stretchiness of the knit.

This Худі under armour storm big logo Footwear UNDER ARMOUR Ua Spawn 4 3024971-600 Pink Red.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Toebox width at the widest part
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 99.7 mm
Average 98.5 mm
Compared to 370 running shoes
Number of shoes
91.6 mm
Toebox width - widest part
104.9 mm

Toebox width - big toe

In the big toe area, the shoe is just average. If your feet feel comfortable in most shoes, then you should be good to go with these.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Toebox width at the big toe
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 76.7 mm
Average 78.4 mm
Compared to 244 running shoes
Number of shoes
67.6 mm
Toebox width - big toe
89.2 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

The UA HOVR Phantom 3 is impressively stable, leaving no room for doubt in its performance. Whether we were walking, running, or cross-training, this shoe delivered in the stability department.

Torsional rigidity

One of the main factors contributing to the great stability of this shoe is its torsional rigidity. We gave it a rating of 4 out of 5, a score that's notably above average. This level of stiffness is quite unusual for a versatile running shoe.

Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 382 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

Nevertheless, what really caught our attention about this shoe is its MASSIVE heel counter. This crazy TPU piece wraps around the heel, working effectively to provide stability for heel strikers.

Although it can make the heel feel a little uncomfortable, there's no denying that it's a stand-out feature. This design is just different from anything else we've seen.

Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 4
Average 2.9
Compared to 366 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

A stable shoe requires a wide platform, that's how it works. And the forefoot of the UA HOVR Phantom 3 might not be the widest shoe we've ever come across, but it certainly delivers in this aspect, measuring at 114.9 mm.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 114.9 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 404 running shoes
Number of shoes
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Under Armour HOVR Sonic

But it's in the heel where Under Armour really concentrated their efforts. In this area, we measured an impressive 98.9 mm, which is significantly more than what's typically found in most shoes.

Under Armour Speedfit 2.0.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Midsole width in the heel
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 98.9 mm
Average 90.6 mm
Compared to 404 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Under Armour HOVR Sonic
106.6 mm

Under Armour Iso-Chill Laser II Short Sleeve T-Shirt

A shoe promoted as versatile enough for everything—from running to walking the dog or doing HIIT workouts—can't afford to be stiff. We confirmed this in our test.

To bend the shoe to 90 degrees, we needed to apply only 18.1N of force, which is a lot less than the usual amount required. This flexibility is indeed far from the norm and showcases the shoe's adaptability to various activities.

Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 18.1N
Average 28.1N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 383 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Stiffness in cold (%)

In cold conditions, the shoe disappointingly becomes much stiffer. We found that it requires 29.3N of force this time, a significant increase from the usual new. 

The 61.9% increase in stiffness really falls short when we compare it to other shoes on the market. Although some of this underperformance can be expected from an EVA-based midsole, it's still a letdown.

And what makes this worse is that the shoe is meant to be better suited for cold temperatures.

Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 62%
Average 32%
Compared to 383 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Stiffness in cold
101%

Weight

With the thick rubber, padded upper, and everything else this shoe includes, it's no shock to us that it weighs in at 11.9 oz (338g). That makes it one of the heaviest shoes we've ever measured in the lab.

While we understand that some weight must be added for comfort, Under Armour really needs to rethink this design. They should make the next version, the v4, at least an ounce lighter.

Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 11.92 oz (338g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 404 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

If you're looking for a shoe that feels like an oven in summer, this is it. It's one of the worst shoes we've ever tested for breathability, so we had to give it the lowest score, 1 out of 5.

When we switched to our light-based test, we found that it effectively blocked all the light. This backs up our previous test. If light doesn't find a way out, the same goes for heat and humidity.

Then we moved to the microscope, and we discovered a thick upper that's really comfortable, but again, it has no ventilation holes or room for air to escape.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top microscope

Footwear UNDER ARMOUR Ua Hovr Sonic 4 Clr Shft 3023997-001 Blk Adidas Ultraboost, this upper could've been something really great no matter the season.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top microscope close

On the plus side, the upper is one of the more elastic we've seen. Under Armour went all in with comfort, but they forgot about breathability, and that makes the shoe unsuitable for warm weather—although is great for winter.

Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 1
Average 3.8
Compared to 333 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Of course, a thick upper with limited breathability has its advantages. One benefit, already noted, is that the shoe is superb for winter since it keeps our feet warm. Another advantage is the outstanding durability.

In our Dremel test, the UA HOVR Phantom 3 held up in a remarkable way. We gave it a well-deserved perfect score—5 out of 5.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Toebox durability
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 5
Average 2.6
Compared to 267 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Мужская спортивная одежда Under Armour

The heel of the shoe is also durable, and it seems improbable that anyone could wear it out before other parts of the shoe.

Although it didn't achieve the top score like in the previous test, we awarded it a 3 out of 5. This mark surpasses the average, showcasing its superior performance in our assessment.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Мужская спортивная одежда Under Armour
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 262 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Мужская спортивная одежда Under Armour
5

Outsole hardness

After our first two tests with the Dremel, we had a pretty clear idea that Under Armour was aiming to create a durable shoe. But we didn't know what their plans were for the outsole.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top outsole

Measuring 86.8 HC on our durometer, this rubber is really hard, so they're focusing on durability again. This might affect the grip, but since we believe this is more of a multi-purpose shoe rather than a pure running shoe, it doesn't worry us that much.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Outsole hardness
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 86.8 HC
Average 79.7 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 384 running shoes
Number of shoes
56.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole thickness

Moving on to the outsole thickness, the trend continues. It's thicker than most shoes, so when combined with the hardness we measured earlier, we can easily expect this outsole to last a very long time.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Outsole thickness
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 4.3 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 401 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Tongue padding

While the tongue area of the shoe isn't overly padded (3.0 mm), the material is incredibly comfortable, and it offers a wonderful balance for this particular design.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Tongue padding
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 3.0 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 401 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Slides UNDER ARMOUR Ua M Ansa Fix Sl 3023761-104 Gry

Under Armour has chosen to include a sock-like tongue in the design, and it's a complete success in terms of comfort.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Slides UNDER ARMOUR Ua M Ansa Fix Sl 3023761-104 Gry
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 Sock like

Removable insole

The Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top stands out because the insole is not removable, which is quite unusual. Therefore, it may not be the best choice for those of you need to use custom orthotics.

Under Armour Streaker 2.0 Shift Womens Tank Top Removable insole
Test results
HOVR Phantom 3 No