ASICS GEL CUMULUS 22 MUJER | Our verdict

Asics Gel Quantum 360 Knit 2 'Black White' Black White Black T840N-9001 daily trainer that's best suited for beginners and casual runners. It's a stable and well-padded shoe that feels great right out of the box. While its EVA midsole is nothing to write home about, it effectively protects us from impact while out on easy runs or walks about town and is firm enough to work as a gym trainer.

ASICS GEL CUMULUS 22 MUJER Pros

  • Extremely breathable
  • Flexible and forgiving
  • Chaussures ASICS Gel-Venture 8 Awl 1012B162 French Blue Pink Rave 400
  • Feels stable underfoot
  • Chaussures ASICS Gel-Kayano 29 1012B272 Frosted Rose Deep Mars 700
  • Anthony Brain Dead x ASICS TRABUCO MAX BD Chaos Slime
  • Works well for walking or gym days
  • asics gel lyte iii ranru
  • Budget-friendly

ASICS GEL CUMULUS 22 MUJER Cons

  • Could be lighter
  • Womens ASICS Gel-Rocket 10 Volleyball
  • Not responsive enough for high speeds

ASICS GEL CUMULUS 22 MUJER | Audience verdict

79
Decent!

Who should buy

We recommend the size x asics gel lyte far side of the moon pack as an excellent training companion for:

  • Beginner runners looking for a neutral shoe that's also good for walking and gym days
  • Heavyset runners or those with mild overpronation who need more firm cushioning for a stable yet protective ride 
  • ASICS Gel-Cumulus 22 Grey
  • Those in the market for a wallet-friendly and durable daily trainer that can tackle easy runs 

Asics Jolt 4 rf

Who should NOT buy

We found the Jolt 4's EVA midsole to be decidedly firm, so those who prefer softer cushioning from their daily trainers will be better served with the plush ASICS Gel Cumulus 25

The Jolt 4 also lacks the responsiveness to facilitate fast-paced runs. For speedy runners looking to crush their PRs, we recommend triathlon-ready Asics Quantum 360 Heren Schoenen instead.

 Asics Jolt 4 f feaf

While the Jolt 4 is certainly a stable shoe, we recommend that those with pronounced overpronation in their stride should look into a more supportive daily training option to avoid injury. The ASICS graphic-print T-shirt Blau ASICS ha logrado una Leggings Asics ESNT 7 8 TIGHT are both good stability shoe alternatives. 

Cushioning

Heel stack

We Pantofi the Jolt 4's heel stack to be 31.6 mm thick at the heel which is a hair shy of our current lab average. This gives us more than enough foam to dampen the impact of our landings and keep us feeling protected while testing this shoe. 

Asics Jolt 4 Heel stack
Test results
Jolt 4 31.6 mm
Average 34.2 mm
Compared to 403 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Drop

The difference in our stack measurements leaves us with a slightly higher-than-advertised heel drop of 9.4 mm as opposed to the 8 mm stated by ASICS. This difference isn't too vast and places the Jolt 4 in the category of high-drop shoes.

Asics Jolt 4 Drop

This is a good drop height for beginner runners with a heel-striking stride as the elevated heel provides extra protection upon impact with the round and promotes smoother heel-to-toe transitions. For a better understanding of the pros and cons of different heel drops, we recommend checking out this article that explores the matter. 

Test results
Jolt 4 9.4 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 403 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
-0.2 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Pressing our durometer against the midsole yields a reading of 29.8 HA which is significantly firmer than average. As such, while the shoe does provide decent impact protection during our landings, the cushioning feels a little brickish underfoot. 

Asics Jolt 4 dfbbzfd

What's more, we found the midsole isn't responsive enough to give us the jolt needed to facilitate speedier or longer runs in this shoe. 

While these factors may not sound that appealing at first, they do mean that the shoe feels quite stable underfoot, especially for more heavy-set runners. 

Ténis ASICS GlideRide vermelho mulher Asics Womens GT-1000 10 as an alternative, while those looking for a more plush and responsive ride for speedy sessions should check out the more premium Sneakers ASICS Tarther Og 1191A272 Black Tuna Blue 002

Test results
Jolt 4 29.8 HA
Average 20.9 HA
zapatillas de running ASICS mujer trail minimalistas.
Compared to 330 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

Midsole softness in cold (%)

To test the effects of cold conditions on the midsole, we placed the Jolt 4 in the freezer to chill for twenty minutes. We then pressed our durometer against the midsole once more and found that it only became 7.6% firmer with a reading of 32 HA. This is still a rather firm result, but shouldn't feel too different from how the shoe performs at room temperature. 

Asics Jolt 4 ASICS x Naked CPH Gel-1130
Test results
Jolt 4 8%
Average 25%
Compared to 330 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
0%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Insole thickness

The Jolt 4's insole is slightly thicker than average at 5.3 mm thick according to our caliper measurements. This gives us an amply padded footbed that does a good job of complementing the midsole cushioning and provides a fair amount of arch support for our test runs. 

Asics Jolt 4 Insole thickness
Test results
Jolt 4 5.3 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 399 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Size and fit

Size

size x asics gel lyte far side of the moon pack is true to size (13 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 380 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

Using our caliper, we Pantofi the Jolt 4's toebox to be 100.4 mm wide at its widest point. This is ever so slightly wider than average and means that the shoe should accommodate most foot shapes rather comfortably. 

Asics Jolt 4 vjnsF

For broad-footed runners who prefer a little more real estate from their daily trainers, we recommend checking out the Adidas Supernova 3 instead. 

Test results
Jolt 4 100.4 mm
Average 98.5 mm
Compared to 370 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
91.6 mm
Toebox width - widest part
104.9 mm

Toebox width - big toe

Moving up to the area around the big toe, the Jolt 4's toebox is 79.9 mm wide. this is also slightly roomier than average which gives us ample room to splay out naturally without worrying about hotspots or blisters. 

Asics Jolt 4 Asics Wmns Gel Pulse 12 Piedmont Grey Orange 1012A724-022
Test results
Jolt 4 79.9 mm
Average 78.4 mm
Compared to 244 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
67.6 mm
Toebox width - big toe
89.2 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Despite being marketed as a neutral daily trainer, the Jolt 4 feels incredibly well-planted as we shift our weight from side to side in the shoe. This means that those with mild overpronation in their strides can make good use of this shoe, however, we recommend that those with more pronounced overpronation look into a more supportive shoe like the ASICS graphic-print T-shirt Blau.

Torsional rigidity

With its healthy stack of dense foam, it's no wonder we found it so difficult to bend and twist the shoe in our hands, leading us to give the Jolt 4 a torsional rigidity score of 4 out of 5. 

This means that the shoe resists the natural twisting and contortions of our foot during our stride and maintains a relatively level base that promotes surefooted landings and toe-offs. 

Test results
Jolt 4 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 382 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Asics Herresko Herre løbesko

The Jolt 4's well-structured and reinforced heel counter barely budged as squeezed and poked at it, earning it a stiffness score of 5 out of 5. As such, the shoe mitigates any excessive lateral movements of our heel which helps to promote a more neutral gait. However, as previously stated, those with severe overpronation should look into a dedicated stability shoe in order to avoid injury. 

Test results
Jolt 4 5
Average 2.9
Compared to 366 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
1
Asics Herresko Herre løbesko
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Another big contributor to the Jolt 4's stable ride is its broad base, with the midsole measuring 116.6 mm wide at the forefoot. 

Asics Jolt 4 Midsole width in the forefoot

This gives us more than enough of a platform underfoot to ensure stable landings and toe-offs while still being nimble enough to take corners without feeling too blocky. 

Test results
Jolt 4 116.6 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 404 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
102.2 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The midsole is also a little wider than average at the heel which is 92.8 mm wide according to our caliper measurements.

Asics Jolt 4 Midsole width in the heel

This means that heel strikers will also enjoy a stable landing platform in the Jolt 4. 

Test results
Jolt 4 92.8 mm
Average 90.6 mm
Compared to 404 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

We secured the Jolt 4 to our workbench and used a force gauge to measure the amount of force needed to bend the shoe 90 degrees. With a reading of 22.1N, the Jolt 4 is more flexible than the average running shoe which allows it to bend along with the natural flexion of our foot with relative ease.

This is great for a daily trainer as it feels comfortable and forgiving on the foot whether we are out of a quick run or a long, slow jog. 

Asics Jolt 4 Stiffness
Test results
Jolt 4 22.1N
Average 28.1N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 383 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Stiffness in cold (%)

We also repeated the flex test after chilling the Jolt 4 in our freezer for twenty minutes and found that it only became 24.5% stiffer, making it significantly more consistent than the average running shoe. What's more, with only 27.5N of force needed to bend the cold Jolt 4 to the desired point, it's not only more flexible than average under similar conditions, but at room temperature too! As such, this shoe can serve as a good year-round training partner, given it's used in tandem with a pair of warm socks during the cooler months. 

Test results
Jolt 4 25%
Average 32%
Compared to 383 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
0%
Stiffness in cold
101%

Weight

Weighing in at 9.1 oz (259g), the Jolt 4 is on par with the average road running shoe. 

Asics Jolt 4 Weight
Test results
Jolt 4 9.14 oz (259g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 404 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

We pumped the Jolt 4 full of smoke to get a visual idea of how well-ventilated it is. As we can clearly see from the footage, the smoke filters out of the shoe quickly and evenly throughout the upper. This leads us to give the Jolt 4 a perfect 5 out of 5 for breathability, making it a great summertime training partner. 

Looking at a backlit cross-section of the upper, the light easily shines through the many pores in the upper mesh, thus explaining the excellent airflow. 

Looking at the mesh under our microscope, we get an image of organized chaos. The fibers are braided seemingly haphazardly but in a way that creates a clear and uniform pattern with lots of perforations and gaps that promote excellent airflow. 

Asics Jolt 4 Breathability

Asics Jolt 4 Breathability
Test results
Jolt 4 5
Average 3.8
Compared to 333 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

We fired up our Dremel to 5K RPM and set it against the toebox with 3.2 N of force to simulate extreme wear and tear. The tool immediately shreds into the upper mesh and minces through it until the abrasive element gets stuck by the end of the four-second test.

The massive hole left in the toebox leads us to give the Jolt 4 a 1 out of 5 for toebox durability which isn't unusual for a road shoe, especially at this price point. 

Asics Jolt 4 Toebox durability
Test results
Jolt 4 1
Average 2.6
Compared to 267 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
1
Toebox durability
5

ASICS GEL CUMULUS 22 MUJER

The heel counter proved to be an even more worthy contender against our Dremel. The tool mens some before it was able to bite into the lining material which did a good job of protecting the soft padding within. 

Once the four-second test was up, we found that we had mangled the lining at the heel but did very little to affect the integrity of the padding at the heel, leading us to give the Jolt 4 a heel padding durability score of 3 out of 5. 

Asics Jolt 4 ASICS GEL CUMULUS 22 MUJER
Test results
Jolt 4 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 262 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
1
ASICS GEL CUMULUS 22 MUJER
5

Outsole hardness

With a durometer reading of 85 HC, the Jolt 4's outsole is slightly harder than our current lab average. This doesn't really affect the shoe's grip, but does bode well regarding the outsole's durability which we will be testing next. 

Asics Jolt 4 Outsole hardness
Test results
Jolt 4 85.0 HC
Average 79.7 HC
zapatillas de running ASICS mujer trail minimalistas.
Compared to 384 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
56.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

This time spinning at 10K RPM, we set the Dremel against the outsole, this time for twenty-two seconds of grinding. 

As we can see, the test had little to no effect on the shoe, with our tire tread gauge finding that only 0.3 mm of material was lopped off. This makes the Jolt 4's outsole much more durable than the average road shoe's. As such, we expect this shoe to last well beyond 400 miles of normal use before noticing any significant signs of wear and tear to the outsole. 

Asics Jolt 4 Outsole durability
Test results
Jolt 4 0.3 mm
Average 1.1 mm
Compared to 245 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Using our caliper, we Pantofi the Jolt 4's outsole to be 4.1 mm thick. This is plenty of rubber underfoot and, considering how well it performed in our durability test, the shoe could have easily skimped on some material in order to shave off some more weight from the shoe. 

Asics Jolt 4 Outsole thickness
Test results
Jolt 4 4.1 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 401 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Grip / Traction

Whether out on the road, on the treadmill, or even on well-manicured park trails, we enjoyed excellent traction while testing the Jolt 4. The only hesitation we faced came when crossing patches of wet and slick cobblestones which are notoriously difficult to grip in general. 

Asics Jolt 4 hbf

Reflective elements

The Jolt 4 doesn't boast any reflective elements to speak of so we don't recommend going for nocturnal runs without using additional high-vis gear. 

Asics Jolt 4 Reflective elements
Test results
Jolt 4 No

Tongue padding

At 8.8 mm thick according to our caliper measurements, the Jolt 4's tongue is thicker than our current lab average. This generous amount of padding provided us with excellent comfort across the instep while also effectively protecting us from lace bite while testing the shoe. 

Asics Jolt 4 Tongue padding
Test results
Jolt 4 8.8 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 401 running shoes
Asics Roadhawk Ff Gs
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The Jolt 4's tongue is non-gusseted so we did experience some slippage during testing, but this was mitigated by how chunky the tongue is which kept it from sliding too far to the side. 

Asics Jolt 4 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Jolt 4 None

Heel tab

The Jolt 4 has an extended heel collar that can be gripped in order to slide the shoe on a little more easily. 

Asics Jolt 4 Heel tab
Test results
Jolt 4 Tampoco debemos olvidar que estas ASICS GlideRide también traen consigo una

Removable insole

The Jolt 4's insole is fully removable, so those in need of custom orthotics for added arch support can use them with this shoe. 

Asics Jolt 4 Removable insole
Test results
Jolt 4 Yes