Our verdict

We found the Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX to excel as a versatile, door-to-trail waterproof option—perfect for both newcomers and seasoned trail enthusiasts. Despite its firm midsole, this model still impresses with a spacious toebox, rugged upper, and seamless road-to-trail adaptability. However, the notable price jump ($45) from its non-GTX counterpart and the lackluster energy return might not appeal to everyone.

Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro Little Flex TD CK1228-007 Pros

  • Impressive upgrade
  • Top-notch waterproofing
  • Amazing durability
  • Exceptional stability
  • Nike dri fit-s-топ для спорту
  • Spacious toebox
  • Nike Air Max 95 Ironstone

Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro Little Flex TD CK1228-007 Cons

  • High price increase
  • Firm ride
  • Grip could improve

Audience verdict

76
Bad!

Who should buy

We're convinced that the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX stands out as a top pick for:

  • Those seeking a reliable, stable, and enduring Gore-Tex door-to-trail running shoe.
  • Casual trail runners in search of a shoe that performs exceptionally in damp conditions, offering both protection and comfort.
  • Here is a look at another soccer inspired model from Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green, seeking an upgraded model that delivers not just waterproof capabilities but also significant improvements across various aspects.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx 21410256 main

Who should NOT buy

We've concluded that the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX might not be the best pick for every runner, particularly gratuitous to its midsole. It falls short on energy return and presents a firm ride, which becomes more noticeable on road segments than trails. In our view, the Nike Pegasus Trail 4 GTX Nike Womens WMNS Internationalist 629684-303.

Moreover, we don't recommend this model for those who need a grippy outsole. Our testing revealed that its traction doesn't quite stand out at all. For superior grip, especially for mixed or purely trail adventures, we found the Hoka Challenger 7 GTX (door-to-trail) and the Nike PG 5 Heren Schoenen (trail) to be much better choices.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx parts 21410258 main

Cushioning

Heel stack

Our caliper measured the heel at a generous 34.5 mm, cushioned enough to comfortably accommodate even the heaviest heel strikers on rugged trails.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx heel stack 21410225 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 34.5 mm
Average 31.9 mm
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
19.6 mm
Heel stack
42.4 mm

Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro Little Flex TD CK1228-007 | Forefoot stack

Our measurements of the forefoot revealed a thickness of 24.3 mm—perfectly suitable for short to medium distance runs. Yet, for long runs exceeding 2 hours, forefoot strikers might seek additional foam.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX forefoot cushioning

t-shirt con slogan Nike This Nike LeBron 13 Receives the XENO Treatment.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx forefoot stack 21410228 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 24.3 mm
Average 24.5 mm
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
13.4 mm
Forefoot stack
33.9 mm

Drop

The advertised 9-mm drop aims to cater to various footstrikes, typical of shoes in the 8-10 mm range.

Through our meticulous measurements, we discovered an actual drop of 10.2 mm, which almost feels the same as 9 mm. However, like many entry-level models, it slightly favors heel strikers.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Drop
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 10.2 mm
Average 7.5 mm
Compared to 136 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
-0.1 mm
Drop
17.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Transitioning to the midsole, a heads-up from the get-go—it presents a firm ride, clocking in at 30.3 HA. Far from plush, the EVA-based foam, especially when coupled with the lugs, delivers a ride firmer than anticipated.

This isn't a downside, as many runners appreciate this firm feel, which also translates to added stability. However, our role here is to ensure you're informed with real data, so you don't end up with gear that misses the mark on your expectations or needs.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Midsole softness
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 30.3 HA
Average 22.6 HA
Nike Air Force 1 Low Staten Island White Green For Sale.
Compared to 113 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
9.1 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
39.0 HA

Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro Little Flex TD CK1228-007 (%)

Subjecting the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX to a 20-minute freezer test, we observed a mere 12.8% decrease in the foam softness—a good outcome, particularly for a shoe designed with winter conditions in mind.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Difference in midsole softness in cold
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 20%
Average 26%
Compared to 113 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
5%
Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro Little Flex TD CK1228-007
68%

Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro Little Flex TD CK1228-007 | Insole thickness

The insole, at a slightly lean 4.1 mm thickness, sits within the typical range, raising no red flags in our lab. 

nike juniper trail 2 gtx insole thickness 21410224 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 4.1 mm
Average 4.7 mm
Compared to 135 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
2.1 mm
Insole thickness
7.9 mm

Size and fit

Size

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX is true to size (19 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 121 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Nike SB Skateboard Blazer Low GT DC7695-200

Exploring the toebox, we eagerly took measurements, especially after feeling the roominess during our initial run with the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX—a surprising feature for any Nike kick!

True to our sense, at 99.4 mm, it offers ample room, making it an excellent option even for those with moderately wide feet.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Nike SB Skateboard Blazer Low GT DC7695-200
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 99.4 mm
Average 95.8 mm
Compared to 58 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
89.8 mm
Nike SB Skateboard Blazer Low GT DC7695-200
99.9 mm

Nike Air Max 95 QS Split Style

Our subsequent measurement unveiled the toebox's tapering, a crucial aspect in assessing overall roominess. Impressively, at 76.7 mm, the shoe maintains its generous width!

nike juniper trail 2 gtx toebox width big toe 22460064 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 76.7 mm
Average 74.9 mm
Compared to 58 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
69.8 mm
Nike Air Max 95 QS Split Style
85.3 mm

Toebox height

Height-wise, the upper is slightly constrained, Buy 25.4 mm according to our calipers. For this reason, while it accommodates a broad forefoot, take into account that the vertical room is limited.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx toebox height 22460065 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 25.4 mm
Average 27.2 mm
Compared to 58 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
22.0 mm
Toebox height
31.8 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Shifting our focus to stability, the shoe's firmness indeed translates into a notable advantage in this department.

Beyond just the midsole, Nike has integrated various design elements that significantly enhance stability, culminating in what we consider a remarkably steady ride. Let's analyze them.

Torsional rigidity

We initiated our evaluation with the torsional rigidity of the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX, assigning it a score of 4 out of 5. This indicates a certain rigidity, albeit with a touch more give than its non-GTX counterpart.

Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 4
Average 3.6
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Спортивные бра топы nike с чашками

With the updated upper, the heel counter's stiffness has become slightly more pliable, earning a score of 3/5 from us.

We see this as a significant and positive adjustment, especially considering we felt the 4/5 rigidity of the non-waterproof version was a tad excessive.

Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 3
Average 3.1
Compared to 129 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
1
Спортивные бра топы nike с чашками
5

nike air max lunar1 jacquard deepest green

A key factor in the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green's stable ride is its midsole width. Our caliper measurements revealed a notably wide dimension at 114.4 mm, enhancing (again) the shoe's overall stability.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 114.4 mm
Average 112.3 mm
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
102.1 mm
nike air max lunar1 jacquard deepest green
124.3 mm

Nike Sudadera Con Capucha Sportswear Club French Terry Cropped Grandes

Exploring the heel, we encountered a generously wide area at 94.3 mm, ideal for heel strikers and even suitable for those with slight stability requirements.

However, a wide midsole always introduce a trade-off—the shoe sacrifices some nimbleness, making it more adept for easy, non-steep trails.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx midsole width in the heel 21410231 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 94.3 mm
Average 89.5 mm
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
72.0 mm
Nike Sudadera Con Capucha Sportswear Club French Terry Cropped Grandes
106.0 mm

RUOHAN WANG × NIKE AIR FORCE 1 LOW 26.5cm

Regarding flexibility, the shoe ranks as fairly standard, a feat achieved through the strategic outsole cutouts we identified before in this same lab review.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX outsole

Without these cutouts, our 90-degree bend test might have classified this shoe alongside more stiff, plated trail models like the Endorphin Edge.

Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 21.7N
Average 27.2N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
5.6N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
54.5N

Nike Air Force 1 Low Computer Chip Space JamDH5354-001 (%)

After a 20-minute lab test, the GTX model of the JT2 showed minimal change in stiffness—merely a 7% uptick!

Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 16%
Average 32%
Compared to 134 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
3%
Nike Air Force 1 Low Computer Chip Space JamDH5354-001
90%

Weight

Weighing in at 10.3 oz or 293g on our scale, the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX impressively shaves off 4% of the weight compared to its standard counterpart, an exceptional feat.

Gore-Tex models typically carry a 5-10% weight penalty, yet this shoe defies that. This also sheds light on Nike's $45 premium for this GTX version.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx weight 21410236 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 10.34 oz (293g)
Average 10.23 oz (290g)
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
7.51 oz (213g)
Weight
12.66 oz (359g)

Breathability

Gore-Tex is a waterproof yet breathable membrane, that works repelling liquid while letting water vapor escape—perfect for keeping your feet always dry.

Yet, our lab tests consistently show GTX footwear tends to lag in ventilation, and the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX is no exception, scoring 2/5 in our evaluation.

Our light test revealed the toebox and parts of the medial zone offer some air flow, but the shoe's design prioritizes durability and stability elsewhere.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX micro 1

The GTX mesh is denser and thicker than the regular edition's. Under the microscope, it was clear the GTX version leaves no entry points for water in the toebox.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx micro 2 21410243 main

Upon manual examination, we noted the upper lacks any flexibility, but delivers ample padding and comfort, a noticeable improvement over the non-GTX model, and a needed one based on the significant $45 price increase.

Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 2
Average 3.2
Compared to 113 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

The moment we picked up the shoe in our lab, the robust reinforcements in the toebox were unmistakably palpable. With our extensive experience analyzing hundreds of shoes, we were confident the Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX would excel in our Dremel test.

True to our expectations, it scored an impressive 5/5, a rare feat that not many shoes achieve. This marks a significant enhancement from the standard version, which only managed a 3.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx toebox durability 21410216 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 5
Average 3.1
Compared to 94 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
1
Toebox durability
5

The Nike Air Force 1 VTF Big

Nike Air Force 1 LV8 Double Air White Black UK 5 US 5.5Y EU 38 Womens Trainers Nike Multiplier No Show Skarpety 2 Pary you'd find on the market, which tempered our expectations. Yet, the Dremel test reveals all truths!

To our delight, we uncovered another top-tier performance, marking the second consecutive 5/5 rating. This outstanding result cements this GTX upper among the most durable we've encountered in our lab testing.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX The Nike Air Force 1 VTF Big
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 5
Average 2.9
Compared to 93 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
1
The Nike Air Force 1 VTF Big
5

Outsole hardness

As we turned our attention to the outsole, our anticipation was sky-high, keen to see how it would perform. The non-GTX variant had shown only moderate results, despite its tough rubber. Our Shore C durometer testing confirmed a similar hardy composition in this model, with a score of 88.9 HC.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX outsole
The outsole incorporates multiple cutouts to lighten the load and enhance flexibility, though this does compromise its toughness.

This outcome suggests the outsole leans more towards enduring wear than maximizing traction—a sentiment that resonated with our test runs. Clearly, it's not in the same league as Vibram or Continental.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Outsole hardness
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 88.9 HC
Average 85.7 HC
Nike Air Force 1 Low Staten Island White Green For Sale.
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
75.5 HC
Outsole hardness
96.1 HC

Outsole durability

Nike Revolution 2 Psv.

Post-test, we observed a 0.9 mm indentation—fairly good! However, we were somewhat disappointed, expecting a tougher rubber that sacrifices grip to yield a more impressive performance.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Outsole durability
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 0.9 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 87 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

The outsole came in at 1.9 mm of thickness, striking a good balance for this shoe—doesn't add a lot of heft yet provides ample material between the midsole and the lugs for durability.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx outsole thickness 21410218 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 1.9 mm
Average 2.3 mm
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
5.5 mm

Misc

Lug depth

nike womens dri fit indy padded sports bra.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx lugs outsole 21410254 main

Our findings align—its 2.7-mm lugs clearly gear this shoe only for easy For, making it an ideal door-to-trail GTX shoe.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx lug depth 21410237 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 2.7 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 136 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
1.5 mm
Lug depth
5.8 mm

Reflective elements

The Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX impressed us with its cool reflective elements, a crowd-pleasing feature that's part of the $45 price hike, enhancing visibility and safety on the trails.

While the standard $85 version lacks these elements, we're hopeful and excited to see them incorporated across all versions in the forthcoming v3—adding that extra layer of safety for every trail runner.

Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Yes

Tongue padding

The dual foam layers create an exceptionally cozy tongue (8.8 mm) for the instep.

nike juniper trail 2 gtx laces 21410255 main
Heres What The Nike LeBron 13 Looks Like On Feet.

This design allows for snug lace tightening without compromising comfort!

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Tongue padding
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX 8.8 mm
Average 6.3 mm
Compared to 137 trail running shoes
Nike Air Max 46
1.3 mm
Tongue padding
12.3 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue boasts a different design compared to its non-GTX counterpart. Now it's tailored for waterproofing, yet it retains the gusset, which we deem crucial in a shoe like this.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

We discovered a handy, finger-loop heel tab, ingeniously crafted to facilitate effortlessly sliding our feet into the shoe—a small yet significantly convenient feature!

nike juniper trail 2 gtx heel tab 21410235 main
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Finger loop

Removable insole

We took out the insole as its not glued, so it allows for easy replacement with custom orthotics or preferred sockliners from other models, thanks to its standard size and thickness.

Nike Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Removable insole
Test results
Shoes NIKE Star Runner 2 Tdv AT1803 004 Anthracite Electric Green GTX Yes