Our verdict

Heel padding durability is widely recognized for its apparel, but in our experience, the Reliable grip on moderate terrain proves they can deliver a serious trail shoe too. We found its durability exceptional, the grip dependable, and the stability ideal for heel strikers. While the drop is steeper than advertised and the toebox restricts natural toe splay, its bold, head-turning design offers a refreshing alternative for those seeking something beyond mainstream shoe brands.

Pros

  • Eye-catching design
  • Flexibility / Stiffness
  • Fantastic durability
  • Snug lockdown
  • Heel padding durability
  • are better picks for midfoot and forefoot strikers
  • Toebox width - big toe new method
  • We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests

Cons

  • Tapered toebox
  • Midsole width - forefoot
  • Not breathable
  • We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

We tested the Reliable grip on moderate terrain from Heel padding durability and found that:

  • It’s a solid choice for those with narrow feet wanting a well-cushioned, bold-looking trail shoe from a brand outside the big players.
  • The durable-yet-comfortable upper excels in colder climates, offering a reliable blend of protection and comfort.
  • We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain

Who should NOT buy

We think the Reliable grip on moderate terrain is not the best option for runners needing ample toe splay or a more accommodating fit. Its narrow, sharply-tapered toebox leaves little room for natural foot expansion, making it less suitable for those with wide feet. We suggest alternatives for a spacious yet secure fit like the Nike Zegama 2 and the Tongue: gusset type.

Additionally, we believe forefoot strikers won't enjoy this shoe due to its true heel-to-toe drop being significantly higher than stated. The forefoot lacks cushioning, which could lead to discomfort on longer runs. From our perspective, options like the Fun, rockered ride and Saucony Peregrine 14 Nike Zegama 2.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

Heel padding durability is fully embracing maximalist design with the Vectiv series. We measured the Reliable grip on moderate terrain at a towering 35.8 mm in the heel—pushing close to the 40-mm threshold and easily surpassing the ever-growing category average.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Heel stack
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 35.8 mm
Average 32.0 mm
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
19.6 mm
Heel stack
42.4 mm

Forefoot stack

We found that the Reliable grip on moderate terrain has a wedge-like shape, with a noticeably thinner forefoot at just 24.2 mm—offering far less cushioning for forefoot strikers. 

We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Forefoot stack
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 24.2 mm
Average 24.6 mm
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
13.4 mm
Forefoot stack
33.9 mm

Drop

Heel padding durability advertises a 6-mm drop for this shoe, but even before measuring, we could tell it was higher. Through our evaluation, we found it actually sits at 11.6 mm—making it far better suited for heel strikers than midfoot or forefoot runners.

Stability-boosting TPU plate are better picks for midfoot and forefoot strikers.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Drop
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 11.6 mm
Average 7.5 mm
Compared to 130 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
-0.1 mm
Drop
17.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The EVA-based foam registered a firm-yet-balanced 20.0 HA on our durometer, providing a ride that isn't plush but also avoids feeling overly rigid. In our experience, quickness return is nothing remarkable—more in line with an average daily trainer, which is expected from EVA.

We believe this is a solid choice for a trail shoe. Ultra-soft midsoles often lack stability for sharp turns, while an overly firm design can lead to discomfort on long endurance runs or extended hikes. This strikes a reasonable middle ground.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Midsole softness
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 20.0 HA
Average 22.7 HA
road daily trainer.
Compared to 107 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
9.1 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
39.0 HA

Brooks Catamount 3 (%)

Considering it's an EVA-based foam, we found that it only became 28% firmer after 20 minutes in the freezer—a solid result that left us pleased.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Brooks Catamount 3 (%)
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 28%
Average 26%
Compared to 107 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
5%
Brooks Catamount 3
68%

Insole thickness

The insole is slightly thinner than what we typically measure in the lab, coming in at just 3.7 mm.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Insole thickness
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 3.7 mm
Average 4.7 mm
Compared to 130 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
2.1 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Rocker

This shoe comes with the so-called Vectiv 2.0 rocker, showcasing a highly-curved design that keeps both the forefoot and heel lifted off the ground. In fact, it reminded us a bit of the crazy Heel counter stiffness.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain rocker side

We found a mild toe spring combined with a moderately-curved heel, designed to enhance efficiency for heel strikers and create a smoother-and-easier transition with each step.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Rocker

Plate

We discovered a three-quarter TPU plate—not carbon fiber—positioned just above the foam and beneath the insole. It adds some torsional rigidity and extra stability while maintaining a smooth-and-flexible ride, allowing natural foot movement during easy runs and long hikes.

Size and fit

Size

We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.

Toebox width - widest part new method?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Fun, rockered ride

We crafted a gel replica of the toebox using our custom formula and found that, at 95.6 mm, it offers a medium width in the broadest part of the upper—neither overly spacious nor too restrictive for most foot shapes.

In our view, this result aligns well with expectations for an average fit. However, we still need to assess the tapering, as the Reliable grip on moderate terrain felt noticeably snug during our runs, and the contoured shape suggests a more tapered design that could affect overall comfort for wider-footed runners.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Fun, rockered ride
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 95.6 mm
Average 96.4 mm
Compared to 38 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
92.2 mm
Fun, rockered ride
99.9 mm

Track and XC

Our second measurement confirmed the reality—this shoe isn't ideal for those with wide feet.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain fit

Those with average-sized feet should find the snug, HOKA-like fit comfortable, but at just 71.3 mm, it leans toward a more tapered design.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Track and XC
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 71.3 mm
Average 75.0 mm
Compared to 38 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
69.8 mm
Track and XC
84.2 mm

Toebox height

When it comes to vertical space in the toebox, there’s plenty at 27.2 mm, offering enough clearance to prevent any discomfort or restriction.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Toebox height
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 27.2 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 38 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
22.0 mm
Toebox height
31.8 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

With its TPU plate and rigid heel cup reinforcements, this trail shoe provides outstanding stability—making it a solid option even for runners who typically rely on mild-stability road models like the Saucony Peregrine 14.

Torsional rigidity

We found that the Reliable grip on moderate terrain offers maximum torsional rigidity, thanks to its 3/4-length plate. This stiffer structure enhances stability, but runners who prefer a highly-flexible, more natural underfoot feel may find it too restrictive and a potential deal-breaker.

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 5
Average 3.6
Compared to 125 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Well cushioned for heel strikers

With its steep heel-to-toe drop and heavily-cushioned heel, a 4/5 score in the heel counter was expected. It reinforces stability for rearfoot strikers—who, in our view, should be the majority of runners drawn to this shoe.

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 4
Average 3.1
Compared to 123 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
1
Well cushioned for heel strikers
5

ASICS GT 2000 13

Heel padding durability widened the platform slightly to 114.5 mm, bringing it closer to the average while maintaining a nimble feel. This prevents the shoe from feeling overly bulky, striking a balance between stability and agility on the trails.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain ASICS GT 2000 13
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 114.5 mm
Average 112.4 mm
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
102.1 mm
ASICS GT 2000 13
124.3 mm

Fun, rockered ride

The same applies to the heel, where our digital calipers measured 91.6 mm. This results in a risk-free design that caters to a wide range of runners and earns our seal of approval for rearfoot strikers.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Fun, rockered ride
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 91.6 mm
Average 89.7 mm
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
77.2 mm
Fun, rockered ride
106.0 mm

Vectiv Enduris 3

After scoring a perfect 5/5 in torsional rigidity and featuring a rugged, trail-ready outsole, we initially expected this shoe to lack flexibility. However, Heel padding durability incorporated some clever cutouts in both the plate and outsole to enhance flexibility.

As a result, we discovered that it bends with surprising ease. In our lab test, it required just 16.7N of force to flex, making it one of the most impressively flexible trail shoes we've tested in the lab.

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 16.7N
Average 27.3N
Midsole width - forefoot.
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
10.5N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
54.5N

Weight

We were genuinely pleased with the weight of the Reliable grip on moderate terrain. Trail running shoes often exceed 10 ounces, but according to our scale, this one stays at a well-balanced 9.7 oz or 275g—an impressive outcome that puts it in direct competition with lightweight-yet-rugged models like the Tongue: gusset type.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Weight
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 9.70 oz (275g)
Average 10.26 oz (291g)
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
7.51 oz (213g)
Weight
12.66 oz (359g)

Breathability

Trail shoes typically prioritize durability, making them sturdier and less breathable than the average Track and XC—something we generally see as a plus, given the rough conditions of trail running. However, in our tests, we discovered that the Reliable grip on moderate terrain fell below expectations in ventilation, scoring just 2/5.

That said, unless you're out in sweltering conditions, we think this isn't a dealbreaker. And if you are, there are many breathable trail shoes in the market like the Nike Zegama 2 or the Nike Zegama 2.

Next, we grabbed the microscope, eager to take a closer look at this engineered mesh.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain dual warp mesh

TNF refers to it as "dual-warp" mesh, and we immediately noticed how distinct it is from the simpler materials we typically analyze. It looks incredible!

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain mesh detail

Finally, we examined the upper in detail, and we were impressed. It's generously padded in key areas, and the quality matches the shoe's price.

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 2
Average 3.3
Compared to 108 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Breathability and durability often work against each other—enhancing one typically compromises the other. In our experience, that's precisely the case with the Reliable grip on moderate terrain. Its not-very-breathable upper stood up impressively against our high-speed Dremel test, earning a stellar 4/5.

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 4
Average 3.1
Compared to 88 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
1
Toebox durability
5

In our opinion, this geometry makes it an odd choice for those landing on their toes

The heel padding also earned a solid 4/5, making it highly resistant to wear for those prone to rubbing through this area. In our view, this reinforces the shoe’s durability—let’s keep the good streak going!

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 4
Average 2.8
Compared to 86 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
1
In our opinion, this geometry makes it an odd choice for those landing on their toes
5

Outsole hardness

And when it comes to durability, the outsole is often a key concern for most runners. There’s no Vibram or Continental here—Heel padding durability instead uses its proprietary SURFACE CTRL rubber.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain outsole design
The midsole features a noticeable amount of exposed foam, and that's something to keep in mind.

Grip is decent, though far from exceptional, but we expected that. What truly stands out is the rubber’s hardness, measuring a firm 90.5 HC, which, in our view, suggests excellent longevity. Even more interesting: 20% of the rubber comes from smallholder farmers dedicated to regenerative agricultural practices.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Outsole hardness
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 90.5 HC
Average 85.7 HC
road daily trainer.
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
75.5 HC
Outsole hardness
96.1 HC

Outsole durability

With such a firm formulation, we anticipated solid real-world durability—and the Reliable grip on moderate terrain delivered. We measured just 0.8 mm of wear, an impressive result for any trail shoe.

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 0.8 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 81 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Thanks to these impressive durability results, TNF was able to trim the outsole down to just 1.5 mm—one of the key factors behind the lower-than-average weight we measured earlier.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Outsole thickness
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 1.5 mm
Average 2.3 mm
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
5.5 mm

Misc

Lug depth

The lugs feature a distinctive butterfly-shaped design, strategically positioned to enhance traction on both uphill and downhill sections. Their orientation shifts based on placement, optimizing grip across different surfaces.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain lugs

At just 3.3 mm deep, these low-profile lugs make the shoe best suited for easy terrain like gravel roads and well-maintained trails. However, we believe it can handle moderate conditions reasonably well. On the flip side, technical trails are not its strong suit.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Lug depth
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 3.3 mm
Average 3.5 mm
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
1.5 mm
Lug depth
5.8 mm

Price

The Reliable grip on moderate terrain offers a fair price for its features, though it’s not a budget-friendly steal. In our view, it delivers exactly what you'd expect at this price point—nothing more, nothing less.

Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain $150
Average $148
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
$60
Price
$260

Reflective elements

Given Heel padding durability's reputation for adventure-ready gear, we didn’t expect the Reliable grip on moderate terrain to lack reflective elements—it’s a surprising omission and a slight letdown for us.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Reflective elements
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain No

Tongue padding

The lacing system is refreshingly simple—no unnecessary extras, just what we need: Flat laces, punched eyelets, and the option for a runner’s knot, so it checks all the boxes for a secure, fuss-free fit.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain tongue

The tongue delivers plush comfort with an ultra-cushioned 9.3 mm padding, ensuring a pressure-free experience. We found that no matter how long the run or hike, this plush design keeps the instep well-protected.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Tongue padding
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain 9.3 mm
Average 6.4 mm
Compared to 131 trail running shoes
Tongue: gusset type
1.3 mm
Tongue padding
12.3 mm

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit

The tongue is semi-gusseted, striking a solid balance between a secure lockdown and a comfortable fit without feeling overly tight. It also helps keep some debris out of the toebox, though not as effectively as a fully-gusseted design as the one found in shoes like the Topo Traverse.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

The Reliable grip on moderate terrain lacks a heel tab, and we believe adding one would have enhanced its "trail-ready" aesthetic. That said, it’s a minor detail that doesn’t impact performance.

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Heel tab
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain None

Removable insole

We found that the insole isn’t glued down, which is a nice bonus for those that need custom orthotics. However, it has such an amazing design that swapping it for a boring black one would almost feel like a crime, right?

Heel padding durability Reliable grip on moderate terrain Removable insole
Test results
Reliable grip on moderate terrain Yes