PUMA Lauren London x Suede | Our verdict

The PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet is a great choice for runners who want a little extra excitement in their tempo training. We discovered that this shoe comes with a carbon plate similar to those used in racing shoes, offering excellent energy return, traction, and cushioning, all at a very reasonable price. In our assessment, while there is still room for improvement in breathability, outsole durability, and weight, the overall update is clearly positive.

PUMA Lauren London x Suede Pros

  • Puma Wild Rider NJR" Gr
  • Fantastic cushioning
  • Competitively priced
  • Responsive carbon plate
  • Кеди жіночі puma suede heart satin
  • Enhanced knit upper
  • Ideal for tempo workouts
  • Great at navigating tight turns

PUMA Lauren London x Suede Cons

  • Outsole durability
  • Minor increase in weight
  • Ventilation could be better
  • Narrow toebox

Audience verdict

89
Great!

Who should buy

After extensively testing the eagerly anticipated Puma Pearlized Pet in our lab, we believe it's an excellent choice for:

  • Runners looking for an affordable carbon-plated shoe suitable for both training and occasional races.
  • Anyone looking for a versatile running shoe with exceptional traction.
  • Heel strikers in search of a high-drop shoe that ensures smoother turnover without an ultra-rockered sole.
  • Fans of the Deviate Nitro 2 who desired more cushioning for long runs—this update delivers just that.

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet

Who should NOT buy

We do not recommend the Puma Pearlized Pet for runners seeking stability, as its race-oriented design may not provide sufficient support, especially in the heel. For those discouraged by this problem, we suggest exploring alternatives like the Vans niño niña talla 17 or the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4, Оригінальна олімпійка puma.

Furthermore, in our testing, we found the Puma Pearlized Pet overly restrictive for anyone but those with narrow or average feet. For runners needing a roomier option, we recommend the Puma PJ0051S-001 Sunglasses, Puma south beach.

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

The most significant change in the Puma Pearlized Pet compared to the second version is the stack height. We measured a 5.7-mm increase from the DN2, reaching a substantial 37.4 mm. This higher stack is a blessing for rearfoot strikers, especially those with heavier builds.

We found that this minor weight increase is a worthwhile trade-off. In our view, the added cushioning more than compensates for the extra weight.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Heel stack
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 37.4 mm
Average 34.2 mm
Compared to 397 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot features 27.3 mm of stack, providing ample cushioning for midfoot and forefoot strikers to confidently take on long runs without any issue.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Forefoot stack
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 27.3 mm
Average 25.6 mm
Compared to 397 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

PUMA Lauren London x Suede | Drop

After both measurements, we did the basic math and found a 10.1 mm drop—remarkably close to Puma's official 10 mm figure. It's rare that a brand's stated figure matches our lab results so closely!

But what does a 10 mm offset imply? We believe that this shoe is better suited for rearfoot strikers, yet it remains versatile for all runners. At the end of the day, this drop is similar to many daily running shoes like the PUMA Velocity Nitro 3.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Drop
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 10.1 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 397 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Puma Pearlized Pet maintains the same dual-foam formula as its predecessor, combining a bottom layer of Nitro with a top layer of Nitro Elite. Let's start with the former.

We discovered that Nitro, PUMA's go-to foam for training shoes, is still a winner. This nitrogen-infused foam significantly outperforms standard EVA, offering much better energy return.

That’s not exactly what we’d call subtle branding.

In terms of softness, we measured it at 18.0 HA with our Shore A durometer, which is a balanced approach for a shoe debuting in 2024. It’s not ultra-plush, but definitely on the softer side, providing a comfortable and responsive ride.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Midsole softness
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 18.0 HA
Average 21.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 324 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
35.0 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

But the real gem of the shoe is above the plate: Nitro Elite. For some reason, PUMA does not brand this foam on the shoe, saving it for their top-tier models like the Футбольные бутсы копочки puma р for marketing reasons. However, it’s definitely there, and we discovered it after slicing the shoe in half.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet nitro elite

We found that Nitro Elite came in slightly firmer under our durometer at 19.0 HA, but the difference is barely noticeable. Nonetheless, the best part of this A-TPU (Aliphatic TPU) foam is the energy return—it’s off the charts. Hence, we think this incredible responsiveness makes the Puma Pearlized Pet an outstanding tempo training companion for just £160.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Secondary foam softness
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 19.0 HA
Average 24.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.

Puma X Ray Lite Ac Inf Bambina Bianco In Materie Tessili Con Chiusura In Velcro (%)

After putting the DN3 in the freezer for 20 minutes, we tested it again with our durometer. The result was a bit disappointing, with a 29.9% increase.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Мужские puma bmw кепки
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 30%
Average 25%
Compared to 324 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Puma X Ray Lite Ac Inf Bambina Bianco In Materie Tessili Con Chiusura In Velcro
63%

Insole thickness

The increase in the insole's thickness to 5.0 mm (up from 4.4 mm) enhanced comfort and slightly contributed to the increased stack height.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Insole thickness
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 5.0 mm
Average 4.4 mm
Compared to 393 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Size and fit

Size

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet is slightly small (72 votes).

Кросівки puma zone?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 374 running shoes
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

While some runners hoped for a wider fit in the Puma Pearlized Pet, we found that PUMA has continued with the narrow design of its previous model. And hey, we respect PUMA’s commitment to their design philosophy—if they believe in their idea, they stick with it.

We made a 1:1 gel replica of the toebox and confirmed that it remains narrow, measuring just 91.5 mm at its widest part. This design is comparable to many racing shoes and is ideal for runners with narrow feet, offering a snug, race-ready fit. And for those who prefer a broader fit, we think that the combinación entre la mediasuela estrella de Puma is an interesting alternative.

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet Toebox width - widest part
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 91.5 mm
Average 95.5 mm
Compared to 152 running shoes
Number of shoes
90.9 mm
Toebox width - widest part
102.4 mm

Toebox width - big toe

The narrowness of the upper continues in the front of the toebox, where our second measurement revealed just 69.7 mm.

This places it among the few shoes below the 70-mm threshold, making it best suited for narrow-footed runners.

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet Toebox width - big toe
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 69.7 mm
Average 73.7 mm
Compared to 152 running shoes
Number of shoes
67.9 mm
Toebox width - big toe
83.5 mm

Toebox height

Those who enjoy a tight, race-focused fit will thrive in this shoe. The height of the upper is notably low, measuring just 24.6 mm.

However, if you prefer a bit of freedom inside the shoe, even sizing up won’t make a difference with the Puma Pearlized Pet. Its snug fit is clearly built for speed rather than comfort.

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet Toebox height
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 24.6 mm
Average 27.2 mm
Compared to 151 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.4 mm
Toebox height
33.8 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

From our perspective, the Puma Pearlized Pet demands good running form and a neutral footstrike. Otherwise, you'll struggle with stability despite the carbon plate, which helps but cannot overcome the compromises of its narrow and tall design.

Torsional rigidity

The carbon plate nestled between two big foam layers enhances the shoe's torsional rigidity. After manually twisting the shoe with our hands, we awarded it a 4 out of 5 for its stiffness.

Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 376 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Мужские футболки puma evo

We found the heel counter soft and pliable, similar to some competition shoes we've recently tested like the Metaspeed Sky Paris. While it reduces versatility and rear support, we liked the race-day vibe it gives—making you want to go fast and focus on your running form.

Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 2
Average 2.9
Compared to 360 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Мужские футболки puma evo
5

PUMA Power Graphic Tee JR

The racing vibes are born with the midsole dimensions, as this is not a wide shoe by any means.

At just 109.3 mm, it sacrifices some stability but offers an agile and swift ride. We believe that neutral runners with pristine technique will particularly love this design.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Midsole width in the forefoot
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 109.3 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 398 running shoes
Number of shoes
103.3 mm
PUMA Power Graphic Tee JR
126.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel narrows even more dramatically to 82.7 mm, far slimmer than typical training shoes. We found this shoe to be a blend of competition (dimensions, plate) and training (weight, upper). While it will work fantastic for some, it’s absolutely not for anyone with stability issues.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Midsole width in the heel
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 82.7 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 398 running shoes
Number of shoes
73.0 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Rocker

As brands experiment with rockered designs, it's refreshing to find one that offers a more natural running experience. 

We appreciated how the Puma Pearlized Pet maintains a somewhat traditional feel with its subtle rocker. It gently aids in turnover without being overly aggressive—a balanced approach we really liked!

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Rocker

Plate

PUMA deserves praise for pioneering the integration of a carbon plate into training shoes, effectively creating the supertrainer category.

The third iteration of the Deviate Nitro retains this innovative approach—featuring a carbon plate (PWRPLATE) nestled between two layers of foam. The design maintains a slight curve in the plate, distinguishing it from the more extreme spoon-shaped designs found in racing shoes like the PUMA Fast-R Nitro Elite 2.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Plate

Flexibility / Stiffness

We've noticed a welcome change from the previous version—the Puma Pearlized Pet is less stiff. While it still incorporates a carbon plate and delivers a stiff feel, it's a gentler ride when compared to the DN2. This modification makes mid for a training shoe, so we fully endorse this adjustment.

In our 90-degree bend test, the Puma Pearlized Pet recorded a force of 35.6N, which confirms its more forgiving nature.

Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 35.6N
Average 28.1N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 380 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
72.1N

Stiffness in cold (%)

After subjecting the Puma Pearlized Pet to another 20-minute freeze test, we observed a concerning change—the shoe's stiffness noticeably increased. The rigidity jumped by 41.7%, a disappointing result that raises some questions about its consistency in varying conditions.

Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 42%
Average 33%
Compared to 380 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Stiffness in cold
111%

Weight

Weighing 9.5 oz (268g), we noticed a minor increase of 0.4 oz from its predecessor—likely due to the increased stack height we'll discuss next.

PUMA Lauren London x Suede.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Weight
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 9.45 oz (268g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 398 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.61 oz (159g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

Knit uppers commonly show reduced breathability in our smoke tests, and the Puma Pearlized Pet is no exception. While exceptionally comfortable, its airflow does suffer somewhat.

We assigned this model a 3 out of 5 rating—a respectable score for those planning to use these shoes throughout the year but not in excessively hot conditions, where they might fall short.

Our light test revealed focused ventilation in the toebox area—thankfully, since this is crucial for preventing overheating and a 1/5 score.

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet microscope

Under the microscope, we found a thin structural layer over a denser knit—this is typical for knit uppers. We also discovered that instead of incorporating specific ventilation holes, PUMA opted for a highly breathable design throughout the top part of the toebox.

PUMA Puma Pearlized Pet micro 2

One significant benefit of knit uppers is their ability to stretch and mould to the foot's shape, and the Puma Pearlized Pet excels in this aspect. It really hugged our feet.

Additionally, it incorporates PUMA's PWRTAPE technology, enhancing the upper's durability and adding stability.

Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 3
Average 3.8
Compared to 327 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

Having lab tested hundreds of shoes, we often brace ourselves for low scores with knit uppers—particularly those with abundant ventilation holes. However, PUMA has exceeded our expectations in this area with the Puma Pearlized Pet.

And that's because achieving a 3 out of 5 in our Dremel test is a rare feat for an upper like this one. While it's not the highest possible score, it's a fantastic achievement that truly deserves praise from us.

This is possible due to the layer we previously mentioned in the microscopic images. Without this secondary structural mesh, the result would have been a 1/5 for sure.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Toebox durability
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 3
Average 2.5
Compared to 261 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

After being satisfied with the toebox, we shifted our focus to the heel padding of the Puma Pearlized Pet.

Although it also scored a 3 out of 5, we feel it didn't quite meet our expectations in this area. While this score isn't alarming and doesn't suggest premature wear for most runners, a rating like 4 or 5 would have left us more pleased.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Heel padding durability
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 257 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

Many runners hate rainy days—some even think it's worth driving an hour or two with the windshield wipers at full blast just to avoid them and train in dry conditions. But with the Puma Pearlized Pet, you can embrace any weather thanks to its exceptional grip.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet outsole
We're on board with performance-oriented running shoes featuring a bit more exposed midsole than a typical daily trainer.

In its latest iteration, the Puma Pearlized Pet features the evolved PUMAGRIP ATR technology, now softer at 72.0 HC, and it continues to offer top-tier traction, rivalling the best on the market like Continental or Vibram. On the negative side, we've observed that although it grips well on every surface, the midsole cutout design tends to trap stones on gravel roads.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Outsole hardness
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 72.0 HC
Average 79.8 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 378 running shoes
Number of shoes
57.0 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

While testing with the Dremel tool, we noticed the PUMAGRIP ATR rubber did not meet our expectations for durability.

Our test results revealed a concerning 1.5 mm indentation—larger than what we'd expect from top-tier outsoles. This could be concerning for runners who quickly wear down their outsoles, as this shoe's exceptional grip comes at the cost of some durability.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Outsole durability
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 1.5 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 239 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

However, our measurements show that PUMA employed 3.2 mm of rubber in the outsole—a standard strategy that should guarantee at least a decent mileage for this shoe, despite its quicker wear.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Outsole thickness
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 3.2 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 395 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.0 mm

Misc

Reflective elements

Unfortunately, PUMA overlooked adding reflective elements to the design of the Puma Pearlized Pet. We hope they'll reconsider for future editions—it would be dope if those large NITRO letters were made reflective!

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Reflective elements
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet No

Tongue padding

The tongue of the DN3, at 4.7 mm thick, offers impressive padding for a lightweight uptempo trainer—we think it's brilliantly designed for this type of shoe.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet laces

The tongue sits slightly higher than usual, but it's not a major concern..

We've observed that the padding is smartly placed to minimise weight, focusing the foam where the laces deliver the most pressure and keeping the rest of the tongue exceptionally thin.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Tongue padding
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet 4.7 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 395 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

шлепки puma оригинал

In our testing, we found the semi-gusseted design of the tongue—which means that it's partially attached to the shoe's sides—really good.

Why? Well, it prevents sideways movement at faster paces, ensuring a secure fit that is essential for tempo and interval workouts.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet шлепки puma оригинал
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

The Puma Pearlized Pet lacks a heel tab, though we noticed a plastic piece designed for both aesthetic appeal and structural support. We're on the fence about this addition.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Heel tab
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet None

Removable insole

We found that the insole is removable—as it's not glued down—and offers nothing extraordinary that would stop someone from swapping it out if necessary. It's essentially just a standard sockliner.

Puma Puma Pearlized Pet Removable insole
Test results
Puma Pearlized Pet Yes